> On Sep 30, 2013, at 9:20 AM, "David Daney" wrote:
>
>> On 09/30/2013 07:56 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>> Lately I received several patches for build issues that only strike if
>> CONFIG_BUG is disabled. Here's a test case extracted from one of them:
>>
>> /*
>> * Definition of BUG taken from a
> On Oct 5, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 02:18:57AM +, Kapoor, Prasun wrote:
>>> On 10/2/15, 2:37 AM, "Catalin Marinas" wrote:
>>> So, at the time, following x32 discussions, we thought of using the
>>> native ABI as much as possible. However, two i
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:51 AM, "pins...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:33 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> It is useful to pass down MIDR register down to userland if all of
>>> the online
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:19 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:51:44PM +0100, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:33 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
It is usef
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 3:13 AM, Siarhei Siamashka
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:58:56 +0800
> pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 1:30 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 07:46:22PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> It is useful to
> On Sep 3, 2015, at 1:12 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 10:52:05PM +0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
>> wrote:
> [...]
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:58:56 +0800 pins...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Yes but I guess you talk ab
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 2:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 01 October 2015 22:15:20 Yury Norov wrote:
>>
>> Regarding time_t, it, of course, doesn't takes much time to make it
>> 32-bit, but I think 64 bit is better because of Y2038. X32 and mips
>> n32 has time_t 64-bit (and ppc, not
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 4:15 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 14 April 2015 10:45:43 Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>>> On Apr 14, 2015, at 3:08 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 14 April 2015 11:33:13 Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>>>
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 3:08 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 14 April 2015 11:33:13 Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>> Arnd,
>>
>> After getting a good night’s sleep, the “reuse the existing system call
>> table” comment
>> makes a little more sense as I construe it as having just one me
> On Apr 16, 2015, at 4:19 AM, Dr. Philipp Tomsich
> wrote:
>
> Just for the record (and to avoid anyone wasting their time on what’s
> available
> today): we are migrating this over to option (a) now, even though we would
> prefer to see option (b) implemented.
>
> If we get a consensus o
> On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang"
> wrote:
>
>> On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>> Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin,
>>
>> Other than 64-bit time_t
> On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:37 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang"
> wrote:
>
>> On 2014/4/24 11:28 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:55:25AM +0100, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>>>> On 2014/4/24 02:26 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:06 PM, "Chung-Lin Tang"
> wrote:
>
>> On 2014/4/25 02:42 AM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:37 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
> On Jul 1, 2014, at 8:07 AM, "Catalin Marinas" wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:02:17AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
>> index 1e1ebfc..8241ffe 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:08 AM, "Catalin Marinas"
> wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:01:55AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> New version of the patches with documentation, signal changes are
>> simplified, using less compat syscalls and splitting up the patches so
>> it is ea
> On Jun 17, 2014, at 3:48 AM, "Catalin Marinas"
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 05:19:32PM +, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:08 AM, "Catalin Marinas"
>>>> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12
> On Apr 13, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Philipp Tomsich
> wrote:
>
> We use a 'natively sized' stack_t in glibc (i.e. having a 32bit pointer for
> ss_sp), which requires the invocation of the compat layer for the following
> functionality:
> * sigaltstack
> * saving and restoring uc_stack during signal
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 5:45 AM
> To: Pinski, Andrew
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> Norov, Yuri ; catalin.mari...@arm.com;
> nathan_ly...@m
Sorry sending again as plain text (I did not notice that before).
On 5/6/2017 9:29 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
On 04/23/2017 07:47 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> ISB is normally required before mrs CNTVCT if we want the
> mrs to completed after the loads. In this case it is not.
> As we are taking the diff
19 matches
Mail list logo