Re: Network speed Linux-2.6.10

2005-03-01 Thread Paul Dickson
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:29:24 -0500 (EST), linux-os wrote: > Intel NIC e100 device driver. Two identical machines. > Private network, no other devices. Connected using a Netgear switch. > Test data is the same thing sent from memory on one machine > to a discard server on another, using TCP/IP SOCK_

Re: Network speed Linux-2.6.10

2005-03-01 Thread Paul Dickson
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 01:02:50 +, Baruch Even wrote: > > Might this be related to the broken BicTCP implementations in the 2.6.6+ > > kernels? A fix was added around 2.6.11-rc3 or 4. > > Unlikely, the problem with BIC would have shown itself only at high > speeds over long latency links, not

Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering

2005-03-03 Thread Paul Dickson
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:21:38 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds wrote: > The reason I put a shorter timeframe on the "all-even" kernel is because I > don't want developers to be too itchy and sitting on stuff for too long if > they did something slightly bigger. In theory, the longer the better > there, b

Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/14] Introduce union stack

2007-05-19 Thread Paul Dickson
On Mon, 14 May 2007 13:23:06 -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > + while (fs) { > > + locked = union_trylock(fs->root); > > + if (!locked) > > + goto loop1; > > + locked = union_trylock(fs->altroot); > > + if (!locked) > > +