see how this could work, could you elaborate?
This is the patch proposal, for comments:
From 81afd3b666cbf94bb9923ebf87fb2017a7cd645e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maximiliano Curia
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 22:48:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Only let characters through when there are active readers.
Peter Hurley wrote:
> readline is fundamentally incompatible with an active writer.
This wasn't the case with older kernel versions. I don't see any POSIX
reference that claims user input could be lost setting termios so I think
this is a serious regression.
Also, consider the readline use cas
Hi,
> n_tty_set_room() in drivers/tty/n_tty.c (3.10 mainline)
> From n_tty_set_room():
> /*
>* If we are doing input canonicalization, and there are no
>* pending newlines, let characters through without limit, so
>* that erase characters will be handled. Other exc
¡Hola Arkadiusz!
El 2013-10-24 a las 18:00 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz escribió:
> Was just going over bug-readline and lkml archives and found no continuation
> of this.
> There was a patch proposed but didn't get applied.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/17/31
> Maybe it only needs proper patch s
4 matches
Mail list logo
