Assembler warnings

andard input}:8: Warning: Ignoring changed section attributes for .modinfo -- Matthew Vanecek perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' For 93 million miles, there is nothing betw

Re: Assembler warnings

Keith Owens wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:11:04 -0600, > Matthew Vanecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hi. I see these warnings while compiling modules in 2.4.0-test10. This > >is with RH 7.0's kgcc (why-oh-why did they base their system on > >2.96!

Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy

inux/egcs-2.91.66/specs gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) me2v@reliant tmp $ gcc -O2 -o bug bug.c ; ./bug 0x0 me2v@reliant tmp $ gcc -o bug bug.c ; ./bug 0x0 me2v@reliant tmp $ kgcc -O2 -o bug bug.c ; ./bug 0x0 me2v@reliant tmp $ kgcc -o bug bug.c ; ./bug 0x0 -- Matthew Va

Re: Signal 11

$ ./op Illegal instruction (core dumped) Is that the expected behavior? -- Matthew Vanecek perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' For 93 million miles, there is nothing be

Re: Signal 11

; up until last week my main workstation. > > regards, > > Dave. > I've noticed the same problem, and it occasionally happens with XFree86 4.0.1, as well. Hopefully we've established that this is not the hardware issue which gcc people of so fond of pushing sig 11s on (ev

Re: Signal 11

ny of the folks seeing it checked if Ben LaHaise's fixes for the page > table updating race help ? > > Alan Where are his fixes at? I don't seem to see any of his posts in the archives. -- Matthew Vanecek perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10

Re: Signal 11

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Matthew Vanecek wrote: > > > > Have any of the folks seeing it checked if Ben LaHaise's fixes for the page > > > table updating race help ? > > > Alan > > > > Where are his fixes at? I d

Re: 2.4.0-test12 randomly hangs up

.6 (S3 Trio 64 accel server), gcc 2.95.2 > > Not sure what the problem is yet... keep trying folks. :) > Maybe it's the 3.3.6. RH 7.0 comes with 4.0.1, and a newer glibc. Perhaps try recompiling XFree86 against the latest RH 7.0 glibc (2.1.94) and see what happens, or upgrade you

Re: recommended gcc compiler version

t I had those with kgcc, as well, so I don't reckon those are compiler-related. Right now, I have test12. This is on my desktop machine, doing normal desktop stuff (finances, StarOffice, Netscape, Java development,