Linus Torvalds wrote:
(much of the latter syntactic cleanups). And arm and powerpc updates.
Hmm. I'm trying to build 2.6.20-rc2 on a little powerpc box with
arch/powerpc/configs/linkstation_defconfig, and I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src/linux $ make zImage
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
Mark Glines wrote:
Hmm. I'm trying to build 2.6.20-rc2 on a little powerpc box with
arch/powerpc/configs/linkstation_defconfig, and I get:
...
MODPOST vmlinux
ln: accessing `arch/powerpc/boot/zImage': No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/boot/zImage] Er
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Mark Glines wrote:
Followup: Yeah, it looks like it just doesn't know which format of zImage to
produce for linkstation.
I'm not sure what image should be used by default. I guess it depends on the
bootloader. Maybe default to
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Mark
Thanks for the patch. Are you actually going to test this kernel on a real
hardware or just testing builds? If it is going to be a real life test,
I'd be interested to know what exactly hardware, U-boot version, dts, and
what results.
Yes, I do very much in
cp_init(), when it
affects both TCP and UDP. But hey, it is where it is.
Signed-off-by: Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index bd4c295..4431b87 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2464
On Sat, 12 May 2007 00:06:45 UTC
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All ports above and including 1024 are non-privileged and available to
> anyone.
>
> Applications which have some requirements in this area need to work
> those things out themselves.
Hi David,
I agree completely. My iss
anything wrong with just using the
range IANA recommends, in all cases?
Please consider this patch instead of my previous one.
Signed-off-by: Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index 43fb160..b04b167 100644
--- a
On Sat, 12 May 2007 12:12:38 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Glines wrote:
> >
> > Well, in that case, is there anything wrong with just using the
> > range IANA recommends, in all cases?
> >
>
> I think the IANA range i
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:29:18 -0700
Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is select(0, ..) is a valid operation ?
select(0, ..) is rather commonly used as a portable sleep() with
microsecond granularity. Disabling it will break lots of things.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe from this lis
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So if you have 2 users on a machine running CPU hogs, you should
> *first* try to be fair among users. If one user then runs 5 programs,
> and the other one runs just 1, then the *one* program should get 50%
> of
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 09:46:27 +0100
Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:44 -0800, David Lang wrote:
>
> > why isn't niceing X to -10 an acceptable option?
>
> Xorg's priority is only part of the problem. Every client that needs
> a substantial quantity of cpu whi
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:33:41 +0100
Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ P
> > > COMMAND 6599 root 26 0 174m 30m 8028 R 51 3.1
> > > 7:08.70 0 Xorg
> >
>
> This is a snippet from a hacked up by me version of RSDL.30
12 matches
Mail list logo
