On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:05:56PM +0800, Yunjian Wang wrote:
> This patch set allows TUN to support the AF_XDP Tx zero-copy feature,
> which can significantly reduce CPU utilization for XDP programs.
Why no Rx ZC support though? What will happen if I try rxdrop xdpsock
against tun with this patch
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 06:11:30PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:27:59 -0800
> Ivan Babrou wrote:
>
> > Without this change the driver tries to allocate too many queues,
> > breaching the number of available msi-x interrupts on machines
> > with many logical cpus a
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 20:12:37 +0300
Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Tx code doesn't clear the descriptors' status after cleaning.
> So, if the budget is larger than number of used elems in a ring, some
> descriptors will be accounted twice and xsk_umem_complete_tx will move
> prod_tail far beyond the prod_
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:08:19AM +0300, ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 08:09:29PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> > From: Matteo Croce
> >
> > Add XDP native support.
> > By now only XDP_DROP, XDP_PASS and XDP_REDIRECT
> > verdicts are supported.
> >
> > Co-developed
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:48:08AM +0100, Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
wrote:
> AF_XDP features are tested by the test_xsk.sh script but not by the
> test_progs framework. The tests used by the script are defined in
> xksxceiver.c which can't be integrated in the test_progs framework as is.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:47:58AM +0100, Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series continues the work to migrate the script tests into
> prog_tests.
Hi Bastien,
the sole purpose of this is a cleanup of some sort?
>
> The test_xsk.sh script tests lots of AF_XD
6 matches
Mail list logo
