> [0.696357] ioatdma: Intel(R) QuickData Technology Driver 4.00
> [0.696487] ioatdma :00:04.0: channel error register unreachable
> I assume this is something Supermicro has to fix?
You are probably missing some kernel config option(s) :) - I did fight
similar
issues on a Fujitsu San
-Original Message-
From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 8:00 PM
To: Bruno Prémont
Cc: Justin Piszcz; supp...@supermicro.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Dan
Williams
Subject: Re: Supermicro X9SRL-F - channel enumeration error & ACPI/firm
Hello,
Which user-space application has support to read the temperature off of the
10GbE card?
Regular lm-sensors does not seem to be picking it up.
$ sensors|grep -e -
radeon-pci-0500
coretemp-isa-
nct6776-isa-0a30
Justin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
-Original Message-
From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 8:12 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: Bruno Prémont; supp...@supermicro.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Dan
Williams
Subject: Re: Supermicro X9SRL-F - channel enumeration error & ACPI/firm
> It looks like maybe you don't have CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG turned on?
===> FOR I/OAT DMA
Latest status, it _appears_ its working on the X9SRL-F now, thank you!
1) Supermicro X9SRL-F (GOOD)
[0.738510] ioatdma: Intel(R) QuickData Technology Driver 4.00
[0.738719] ioatdma :00:04.0: irq 75
> It is _not_ working on the:
> 2) Supermicro X8DTH-F (the boot drive in this system is running off a
PCI-e
> card, could the IRQ for the I/O controller be getting re-mapped and
fail?)--
> worse case I can move the SSD from the 6.0gbpa SATA card to the
motherboard
> and see if that works, but tha
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 8:56 AM
To: 'Bjorn Helgaas'
Cc: 'Bruno Prémont'; supp...@supermicro.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
'Dan Williams'
Subject: RE: Supermicro X9SRL
Hello,
Any idea why this is happening (e.g. why is PTE Read Access not set?)
[ 13.204560] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 602
[ 13.208078] dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [04:00.0] fault addr 0
[ 13.208078] DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set
[ 15.777874] dmar: DR
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 10:16 AM
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 3.6.8: dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 602
Hello,
Any idea why this is happening (e.g. why is PTE Read Access not set
-Original Message-
From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 6:54 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: Bruno Prémont; supp...@supermicro.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Dan
Williams
Subject: Re: Supermicro X9SRL-F - channel enumeration error &
-Original Message-
From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:09 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: Bruno Prémont; supp...@supermicro.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Dan
Williams
Subject: Re: Supermicro X9SRL-F - channel enumeration error &
-Original Message-
From: Robert Hancock [mailto:hancock...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:35 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: 'Bjorn Helgaas'; 'Bruno Prémont'; supp...@supermicro.com;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 'Dan Williams'
Subject: Re
-Original Message-
From: Robert Hancock [mailto:hancock...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:55 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas; Bruno Prémont; supp...@supermicro.com;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Dan Williams
Subject: Re: Supermicro X9SRL-F - channel enumeration
Hi,
Was curious why this occurs with postfix's cleanup every so often?
[562320.275125] INFO: task cleanup:5921 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[562320.275127] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables
this message.
[562320.275129] cleanup D 000d 0 5921 2437
Hi,
I read there was a bug in 3.6.2, is there also one in 3.6.0, or can someone
help explain this?
I did boot systemrescuecd 3.0.0 and ran fsck.ext4 -f partition and there
were no errors reported.
Seems the inode for the directory is missing?
# grep 10.0.0.11 -r /etc
/etc/posfix.old/master.cf:10.
-Original Message-
From: ty...@mit.edu [mailto:ty...@mit.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:40 AM
To: Justin Piszcz; Steven J. Magnani
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.6.0 kernel - ext4 corruption, or?
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 08:15:37AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote
Hello,
Any idea what happened here (during a backup)?
Partition is ext4.
[116868.118797] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables
this message.
[116868.118798] dumpD 88003d32a5c0 0 21219 21214
0x
[116868.118801] 880584631d28 0082 ff
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 05:02:17PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Any idea what happened here (during a backup)?
>
> A sync system call took longer than two mintues. Why that happened,
>
Thanks for these details!
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter, Justin,
>
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 07:42:01 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 08:35:59AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> > I also found:
>> > http://www.l
subscribe linux-raid
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hello,
Running 3.10 and I see the following for an md-raid1 of two SSDs:
Checking /sys/block/md1/queue:
add_random: 0
discard_granularity: 512
discard_max_bytes: 2147450880
discard_zeroes_data: 0
hw_sector_size: 512
iostats: 0
logical_block_size: 512
max_hw_sectors_kb: 32767
max_integrity_segment
Hello,
I recent upgraded from 3.10 to 3.11 and see these on occasion in the kernel log:
perf samples too long (2501 > 2500), lowering
kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 5
perf samples too long (5040 > 5000), lowering
kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 25000
I was curious what is causing
Hello,
Kernel: 3.6.0 (x86_64)
Distribution: Debian Testing
I was copying 600GB of files from Samba/Linux to a Windows host, it
copied around 500GB, then this happened, it disabled the network
interface on my Supermicro X9CM-F board (on-board) -- the first
interface, any idea why this happened?
[
Kernel: 3.6.0 (x86_64)
Distribution: Debian Testing
I was copying 600GB of files from Samba/Linux to a Windows host, it
copied around 500GB, then this happened, it disabled the network
interface on my Supermicro X9CM-F board (on-board) -- the first
interface, any idea why this happened?
[93593.56
Hi,
Good news: Supermicro 2.0b fixes an unrelated problem where only 16GB is
addressed in the BIOS when you have 32GB on the system, with 2.0b that is
resolved.
Bad news: This bug still remains (E1000): When you transfer a file/files
over Samba, the latency shoots up really high (this also affect
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 6:15 PM
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net
Cc: supp...@supermicro.com; a...@solarrain.com
Subject: X9SCM-F/82574L/e1000e lag / high latency (e1000e/Intel bug
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 6:15 PM
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net
Cc: supp...@supermicro.com; a...@solarrain.com
Subject: X9SCM-F/82574L/e1000e lag / high latency (e1000e/Intel bug
Hello,
I use an ATI graphics card (PCI-e x1) for a server:
Card: [AMD/ATI] Park [Mobility Radeon HD 5430]
I upgraded my kernel from 3.9.x to 3.10, after rebooting I found the driver
now wants a new firmware:
radeon :05:00.0: radeon_uvd: Can't load firmware
"radeon/CYPRESS_uvd.bin"
I pulled t
-Original Message-
From: Alex Deucher [mailto:alexdeuc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 2:36 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: 3.10 kernel: [drm:evergreen_startup] *ERROR* radeon: error
initializing UVD (-1
Hello,
Currently running 3.10 with:
CONFIG_SENSORS_NCT6775=y
Motherboard: Supermicro X9SRL-F
A couple questions:
1) Was curious if the PCH CHIP/CPU/MCH temperatures should be populated for
this board?
2) Additionally, why is the CPUTIN in alarm?
I also found:
http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Con
Hi,
I saw this in the device drive section and was curious which Intel-based
NICs contain temperature sensors?
Intel(R) 10GbE PCI Express adapters HWMON support
Intel(R) PCI-Express Gigabit adapters HWMON support
I checked the boards below and none appear to expose a hwmon interface:
08:00.0 Eth
-Original Message-
From: Alex Deucher [mailto:alexdeuc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:41 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: 3.10 kernel: [drm:evergreen_startup] *ERROR* radeon: error
initializing UVD (-1
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:li...@roeck-us.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 10:42 AM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 3.10: NCT6776F sensor question with Supermicro
X9SRL-F motherboard
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:li...@roeck-us.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 12:33 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 3.10: NCT6776F sensor question with Supermicro
X9SRL-F motherboard
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:li...@roeck-us.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 1:17 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 3.10: NCT6776F sensor question with Supermicro
X9SRL-F motherboard
Re-sending as text.
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 5:00 PM
To: 'Guenter Roeck'
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; lm-sens...@lm-sensors.org
Subject: RE: [lm-sensors] 3.10: NCT6776F sensor question with Supermicro
X9SRL-F m
Hello,
This bug I reported in November 2012:
http://www.kernelhub.org/?p=2&msg=170797
http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/20121128/highpoint.jpg
Some discussion on the patches:
http://www.kernelhub.org/?p=2&msg=172597
http://www.kernelhub.org/?p=2&msg=171846
http://www.kernelhub.org/?p=2&msg=172346
ailed Intel's Secure Erase), I RMA'd it.
Interesting though that it did not drop out of the array but froze the
system (the failure scenario was odd).
Justin.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:15 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:34:19 -0400 "Justin Piszcz"
> wrote:
-Original Message-
From: NeilBrown [mailto:ne...@suse.de]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 1:57 AM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x
SSD)
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 05:56:51 -0
Hi,
When I run repair on an MD-RAID1 sync_action, the speed slows down and it
stays like this (below) for hours.
The system is then completely unresponsive to user input. I have replaced a
failing SSD; however, after a check, mismatch_cnt seems to increase over
time. When I run repair, the sy
-Original Message-
From: NeilBrown [mailto:ne...@suse.de]
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2013 7:03 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x
SSD)
> Hi Justin,
> this i
-Original Message-
From: NeilBrown [mailto:ne...@suse.de]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 8:36 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x
SSD)
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:10
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Cooks [mailto:aco...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 3:26 AM
To: aco...@gmail.com; j...@8bytes.org; xjtuy...@hotmail.com;
gm.y...@gmail.com; alex.william...@redhat.com; bhelg...@google.com;
jpis...@lucidpixels.com; dw...@infradead.org
Cc: open list
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Cooks [mailto:aco...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 5:19 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: Joerg Roedel; YingChu; Chu Ying; Alex Williamson; bhelg...@google.com;
David Woodhouse; open list:INTEL IOMMU (VT-d); open list; open list:PCI
SUBSYSTEM
Subject: Re
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Justin Piszcz
wrote:
>
> Against a clean 3.7.10 (from ftp.kernel.org)
>
> # patch -p1 <
>
../patch/RFC-Fix-Intel-IOMMU-support-for-Marvell-88SE91xx-SATA-controllers..
> patch
> patching file drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> patching file
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Andrew Cooks wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>>
>> Against a clean 3.7.10 (from ftp.kernel.org)
>>
>> # patch -p1 <
>> ../patch/RFC-Fix-Intel-IOMMU-support-for-Marvell-88SE91xx-SATA-controllers
Hello,
Thoughts?
Saw this when trying to copy files to array with Samba and doing file
operations:
[28939.505792] [ cut here ]
[28939.505818] WARNING: at include/linux/iocontext.h:140
copy_process.part.50+0x115e/0x1220()
[28939.505826] Hardware name: X8DTH-i/6/iF/6F
[2893
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thoughts?
..
Going back to XFS.
EXT4 appears unstable after more than 16TB is on the array (of 60TB ext4fs).
Justin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
-Original Message-
From: Theodore Ts'o [mailto:ty...@mit.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 6:39 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-e...@vger.kernel.org; al piszcz
Subject: Re: 3.5.1 kernel: Oops + stracktrace + ext4 kernel errors!
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012
Hi,
Moving ~276GB of files (mainly large backups) and everything has
seemed to lockup on the client moving data to the server, it is still
in this state..
[75716.705697] INFO: task sync:8790 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[75716.705701] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
disab
Hello,
Motherboard: Supermicro X8DTH-6F
Distro: Debian Testing x86_64
>From 3.4 -> 3.5.1 on x86_64 make oldconfig and a few minor changes and the
machine attempts to boot but hangs at the filesystem mounting part of the
boot process.
Picture of where it stops working (a little burry but readable
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Motherboard: Supermicro X8DTH-6F
>> Distro: Debian Testing x86_64
>>
>> >From 3.4 -> 3.5.1 on x86_64 make oldconfig and a few minor
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 5:46 PM
To: Jesper Juhl
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; a...@solarrain.com
Subject: Re: Upgraded from 3.4 to 3.5.1 kernel: machine does not boot
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:53 PM
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Justin Piszcz
>
> Hi,
>
> Found the root cause, the 3.5.1 kernel cannot mount my ext4 filesystem
> (60TB).
>
> The 3.4 kernel works fine.
>
> This is proven by commenting out the filesystem in /etc/fstab with
> 3.5.1, and all is
Hello,
I upgrade to each new kernel release and with 3.5.1 (from 3.4) I can no
longer mount my 60TB ext4 volume.
If I boot back to 3.4, it works fine.
Details here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/10/205
Anything I can do besides testing each 3.5-rcX to find where the regression
lies?
Justin.
--
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 8/10/12 11:14 PM, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Justin Piszcz
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Found the root cause, the 3.5.1 kernel cannot mount my ext4 filesystem
>>&g
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 11.08.2012 19:36, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I upgrade to each new kernel release and with 3.5.1 (from 3.4) I can no
>> longer mount my 60TB ext4 volume.
>> If I boot back to 3.4, it works f
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Justin Piszcz
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> On 8/10/12 11:14 PM, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:07
Hi,
Kernel: 3.5.1 x86_64
Just FYI, this may have been due to an NFS issue (remote host turned
off during dump possibly) but reporting just incase:
[41793.725267] [ cut here ]
[41793.725273] WARNING: at include/linux/iocontext.h:140
copy_process.part.56+0x1041/0x1190()
[417
Hi,
Is the following normal on an X9SRL-F board (bios 1.0a)?
In the manual it states:
Data Direct I/O
Select Enabled to enable Intel I/OAT (I/O Acceleration Technology), which
significantly reduces CPU overhead by leveraging CPU architectural
improvements and freeing the system resource for othe
Hello,
Kernel 3.6.10, first time I have seen this that I can remember (on 10GbE)
anyway, is this a known issue with 3.6.10?
When the link went down is when I rebooted/etc the remote host attached on
the other end.
I've not changed anything physically with the hardware and have been on
3.6.0-3.6.9
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 10:49 AM
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 3.6.10: Intel: ixgbe :01:00.0 eth4: Detected Tx Unit Hang
Hello,
CORRECTION: Kernel 3.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list
-Original Message-
From: devendra.aaru [mailto:devendra.a...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 1:39 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.6.10: Intel: ixgbe :01:00.0 eth4: Detected Tx Unit Hang
Ccing netdev
On Sat, Dec
Hello,
I migrated from an X7SPA to an X9SCM-F-O and now gpsd/ntp no longer sync
with my GPS unit:
http://www.amazon.com/GlobalSat-BU-353-USB-GPS-Receiver/dp/B000PKX2KA
I did some digging and it looks like the system clock on this motherboard
with the latest BIOS (2.00a) runs 1 second too fast whe
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2012 11:12 AM
To: p...@lists.ntp.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: X9SCM-F-O clock drift +1 second into the future when ntp running?
Hello,
I migrated from an X7SPA to an X9SCM-F-O
I have three machines with the same motherboard and gigabit ethernet, ABIT
IC7-G.
Two are Linux (Debian)
One is Windows 2000.
When I copy 100 gigabytes from a Windows 2000 PC to either one of my Linux
machines, I get a *SUSTAINED* transfer rate of 40-50MB/s over gigabit.
Sustained meaning, wh
[*] HPET Timer Support
[*] Provide RTC interrupt
[*] HPET - High Precision Event Timer
[*] Allow mmap of HPET
http://tlug.up.ac.za/guides/lkcg/arch_i386.html
HPET Timer Support HPET_TIMER
This enables the use of the HPET for the kernel's internal timer. HPET is
the next generation ti
General Question:
Would a desktop or server benefit more from SMT?
For a Pentium 4 w/HT, we use SMP.
What are the advantages/disadvantages of using SMT in the kernel?
Thanks,
Justin.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
After a couple hours of use, I get this error on a linear RAID under
2.6.12.2 using loop-AES w/AES-256 encrypted filesystem.
Anyone know what is wrong?
Filesystem "loop1": XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2271 of
file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xc025e807
[] xfs_da_do_buf+0x50
Kernel 2.6.12.5:
1- 400GB Seagate 8MB cache, 7200RPM, ATA/100 drive.
2- ATA/133 Maxtor (ATA/Promise Controller)
1) Attached 400GB to Seagate 400GB drive.
2) (Not mounted yet)
3) See below
hde: 781422768 sectors (400088 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=48641/255/63,
UDMA(100)
4) Partition with fdisk (
I have three different Maxtor (promise) ATA/133 controllers, it happens
with all three.
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On Friday 26 August 2005 05:36 pm, Justin Piszcz wrote:
2- ATA/133 Maxtor (ATA/Promise Controller)
Make sure its actually the kernel and not that
It appears that 2.6.13-rc7 has fixed the bug.
I would like to know *What* changed, but I'll probably never find out :(
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have two different machines with the 7200.8 Seagate 8MB 400GB drives.
Both h
These options are self-explanatory:
x x ( ) No Forced Preemption (Server) x
xx x ( ) Voluntary Kernel Preemption (Desktop) x
xx x (X) Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop) x x
It says 100 HZ or 250 HZ is go
Yes, I have two separate machines with the same controller and HDD.
As soon as I found out it fixed the bug on one of them, I changed it on
the other, neither machine has crashed since.
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On Friday 26 August 2005 05:36 pm, Justin Piszcz wrote:
2
All,
I am trying to get everyone together on this to hopefully solve a serious
bug that I have seen on multiple machines with:
a) A Promise ATA/133 controller (ATA/100 works OK)
b) Kernel 2.6.12 or 2.6.13 (2.6.13-rc7 appears to be OK)
The drive is a Seagate 7200.8 400GB 7200RPM 8MB cache disk
LL support qqqk
x x[ ] IDE Taskfile Access
Anyone have any suggestions how I can solve this problem?
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Justin Piszcz wrote:
All,
I am trying to get everyone together on this to hopefully solve a serious bug
that I have seen on multiple machines with:
a)
I still get this error when the drive is on a Promise ATA/133 card.
I have the same setup in two separate machines, the results are the same
with kernel 2.6.13, ideas?
Should I just get more ATA/100 cards and stop trying to figure out what
the bug is? Keep in mind the Promise ATA/100 cards ex
On 2.6.13, I have a simple script that tars the data from the root
filesystem to a 400GB disk, when this started, I got the following errors
and then the machine locked up:
Again, 400GB/Seagate+ATA/133, someone should add to the CONFIG_OPTION that
400GB drives are NOT supported w/ the Promise
I have a box where I keep getting this in dmesg:
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:00.0[A] -> Link [LNKD] -> GSI 5 (level, low)
-> IRQ 5
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:00.0[A] -> Link [LNKD] -> GSI 5 (level, low)
-> IRQ 5
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:00.0[A] -> Link [LNKD] -> GSI 5 (level, low)
-> IRQ 5
Also,
Part of the problem may be that I have two ATA/133 Promise cards in one
box and only one ATA/133 in the other box.
Kernel 2.6.13 has fixed the problem with one ATA/133 card in the box.
Kernel 2.6.13 has not fixed the problem with two ATA/133 cards in the box.
FYI
Justin.
On Mon, 5 Se
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 06:26:08 -0500 (EST)
Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am putting a new machine together and I have dual raptor raid 1 for the
root, which works just fine under all stress tests.
Then I have the WD 750 GiB drive (n
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Justin Piszcz wrote:
Trying to format a floppy (2-3 of them) on a GA-P35-DS4 2.0 with a regular
Sony floppy on Debian x86_64 with kernel 2.6.23.9:
# fdformat /dev/fd0
Could not determine current format type: No such device
# mformat a:
mformat
Can some please explain with almost identical kernel .config's I see this
on a p965 Intel board:
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
0: 2501669875 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 8 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Sunday, January 20, 2008 10:56 pm Yinghai Lu wrote:
[PATCH] x86_32: trim memory by updating e820 v2
when mtrr is not covering all e820 table, need to trim the ram, need to
update e820
reuse some code for x86_64
here need to add early_identify_cpu
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Monday 21 January 2008 11:14:02 am Justin Piszcz wrote:
please get x86.git
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
cd linux-2.6
#--{ x86.git instructions }-->
# Add Linus's t
Quick question,
Setup a new machine last night with two raptor 150 disks. Setup RAID1 as
I do everywhere else, 0.90.03 superblocks (in order to be compatible with
LILO, if you use 1.x superblocks with LILO you can't boot), and then:
/dev/sda1+sdb1 <-> /dev/md0 <-> swap
/dev/sda2+sdb2 <-> /de
I am putting a new machine together and I have dual raptor raid 1 for the
root, which works just fine under all stress tests.
Then I have the WD 750 GiB drive (not RE2, desktop ones for ~150-160 on
sale now adays):
I ran the following:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdd
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Dec 1 2007 06:26, Justin Piszcz wrote:
I ran the following:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdd
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sde
(as it is always a very good idea to do this with any new disk)
Why would you care about what'
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Dec 1 2007 06:19, Justin Piszcz wrote:
RAID1, 0.90.03 superblocks (in order to be compatible with LILO, if
you use 1.x superblocks with LILO you can't boot)
Says who? (Don't use LILO ;-)
I like LILO :)
, and then:
/dev/sda1+sdb
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Dec 1 2007 07:12, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Dec 1 2007 06:19, Justin Piszcz wrote:
RAID1, 0.90.03 superblocks (in order to be compatible with LILO, if
you use 1.x superblocks with LILO you can't
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Janek Kozicki wrote:
Justin Piszcz said: (by the date of Sat, 1 Dec 2007 07:23:41 -0500
(EST))
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc
The purpose is with any new disk its good to write to all the blocks and
let the drive to all of
Trying to format a floppy (2-3 of them) on a GA-P35-DS4 2.0 with a regular
Sony floppy on Debian x86_64 with kernel 2.6.23.9:
# fdformat /dev/fd0
Could not determine current format type: No such device
# mformat a:
mformat: Could not get geometry of device (No such device)
#
# cat /proc/interru
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 4:01 PM, Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Tried it, it worked successfully!
With stock kernel, previous way I had to use it was mem=8832M and top
showed this:
top - 18:53:52 up 1 min, 2 users, load average: 1.03
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Monday 21 January 2008 01:37:09 pm Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Monday 21 January 2008 11:14:02 am Justin Piszcz wrote:
please get x86.git
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tried it, it worked successfully!
With stock kernel, previous way I had to use it was mem=8832M and top
showed this:
top - 18:53:52 up 1 min, 2 users, load average: 1.03, 0.30, 0.10
Tasks: 169 tota
I have a DVD where I have three files on it, (1.7gb,1.7gb,900mb).
On W2K, when I try to copy the second file, I get a BadCRC error message.
Under Linux, I copy up to about 860MB (watched via pipebench) and then it
freezes the machine, I cannot ping or get to it or do anything on the
console; inst
Yeah, I can try 2.4.29 later tonight; also, the DVD is not scratched, just
formatted with Joilet/ISO instead of UDF (which is what should be used on
DVDs).
However, dd if=/dev/hdh of=file.img
Even with bs=1 for 1 byte at a time, there seems to be no way to
get the data off, how
I have two identical machines [mobo/hardware wise]:
Each machine is a Dell GX1p (500MHZ).
I have two Intel Gigabit NICs, one in each box, hooked up to a GigE
switch.
Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82541GI/PI Gigabit Ethernet Controller
Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82541GI/PI Gigabit Etherne
arrier:0
[BoxB]RX packets:446380046 errors:1276833 dropped:1276833
overruns:1276833 frame:0
TX packets:572550636 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Justin Piszcz wrote:
I have two identical machines [mobo/hardware wise]:
Each machine is a Dell GX1p (500MHZ).
I h
What is this e-mail about?
Something in the kernel changed regarding the Intel e1000 driver from
2.6.5 to 2.6.10. The change resulted in thousands of errors when the NIC
is receiving data. For the past two weeks I have thought about this and
tried everything I could think of, it had really been
1 - 100 of 353 matches
Mail list logo
