clone().
The way each program handles multiple conections is up to the program,
for example apache 1.3 and below does a fork(), mozilla does a
pthread_create(), BOA does a select() in only one process, and apache
2.0 and up does both a fork() and pthread_create().
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTEC
ons of 2.4.0-testX caused ne2k-pci to hang and remain
hanged until reboot.
System: Mb Gigabyte 586dx, 2x200MMX, 96Mb RAM,
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
97
[coma@quartz coma]$ uptime
8:14pm up 4:30, 0 users, load average: 0.19, 0.11, 0.09
but my system works ok, mostly, now I have just upgraded a Realtek 8029
(10Mb) because it gets hung to a Realtek 8139 (100Mb) just to found the
mobo has some kind of busmastering problems, but that's anoth
m_sendmsg+0/784]
[sock_sendmsg+129/164]
[unix_stream_sendmsg+0/784] [sock_readv_writev+140/152]
[sock_writev+54/64] [do_readv_writev+387/596] [sys_writev+65/84]
[system_call+55/64]
Code: 0f 0b 83 c4 0c 90 8d 74 26 00 31 c0 5b 5e 5f 5d 83 c4 0c c3
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
lock btrl $0x0,0x4(%eax)
Code; c01a66d1
11: 8d 4c 24 00 lea0x0(%esp,1),%ecx
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> Jorge Nerin wrote:
> >
> > Hello, this is a patch with some updates to the Documetation/proc.txt
> > file, basically it contains updates to the new files in /proc/, new
> > files in /proc, and a paragraph about /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn. I
Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> Jorge Nerin wrote:
> >
> > Jorge Nerin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello, this is a patch with some updates to the Documetation/proc.txt
> > > file, basically it contains updates to the new files in /proc/, new
> > > files in /
+3,11 @@
--
/proc/sys Terrehon Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>October 7 1999
Bodo Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+2.4.x update Jorge Nerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dan Hollis wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Jorge Nerin wrote:
> > Well, this is a little update to the proc.txt file, it's based in 2.2 kernel, and
>I have updated it a little to the 2.4 series, I have updated all the thing I have
>been told in lk, so I submit this in o
er NTFS. I
believe that it's [un]compressed on the fly, but I'm not sure about this
fact.
The [un]compression mechanism could be a kernel thread calling a
userspace program (gzip, bzip2, definable) doing the actual
decompresion.
Don't know, just thoughts.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Are you sure you have enabled virtual terminal and console support in
character devices, and vga text console in console drivers?
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
Thanks, I put it 2.4 because in the original doc it didn't say anything
about it, and I don't use a 2.2 kernel since a long time.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
So look for processes in zombie state or D state. If you can't kill them
perhaps you will need to reboot.
If it increases slowly it could be another thing, but if it increases
suddenly at a fixed time it could be a cron job.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sometime ago that this question or something
similar has been answered, but the infamous truncate but bit some of my
mailboxes and I can't find it.
I think that this can be done without even using the original tree, only
using the patches, but I cant find a way.
Thanks.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL P
80 3d 90 e7 21 c0 00 cmpb $0x0,0xc021e790
Code; c01df3ba
10: f3 90 repz nop
Code; c01df3bc
12: 7e f5 jle9 <_EIP+0x9> c01df3b3
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Navaho Technologies Ltd. Tel: +44-870-7034015
Well I do have a 486dx2 (66Mhz-24Mb RAM) Root RAID 0 using three disks,
and as far as I can see there are no spikes and the box runs smoothly.
Perhaps it's a cron job or some daemon.
--
Jorge Nerin
&
ts or gets the maximum socket receive buffer in
bytes. The default value is set by the rmem_default
sysctl and the maximum allowed value is set by the
rmem_max sysctl.
rmem_max defaults to 65535 perhaps you could try to increase this and
then use setsockop
boot is
needed to restore net access.
System is dual 2x200mmx 96Mb ide discs no interrupts shared, and as far
as I can remember all kernel from 2.2.x, 2.3.x up to 2.4.0-testx exhibit
this problem.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
> Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> >
> > Ok, I reported it several times, but it gets ignored. I have a Realtek
> > 8029 (ne2k-pci), and with both drivers ne and ne2k-pci I can easily get
> > it stuck by doing a ping -f to a host in the local
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Jorge Nerin wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > So I think that it could be a little window near sock_wait_for_wmem that
> > could be SMP insecure wich is affecting me.
> >
> > The code of sock_wait_for_wmem in 2.4.0-test10 is this:
> >
as I said in a previous msg it gave me BUG()s very early in the
tests, and I still had network access.
If someone has a better sugestion as a nic stress tool I can try it, but
now I only have two ways of reaching this limits, ping -f of big
packets, and sometimes (only 4 or 5) during a copy of
Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Well, I have tried it with 2.4.0-test10, both SMP and non-SMP, and the
> > > result is a little confusing.
> > >
> > > Under SMP a ping -s 5 -f other_host takes down the
bit set, so it could be necessary to echo 0
to
+/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn, if you want to talk to this sites. For more
info
+you could read RFC2481.
tcp_retrans_collapse
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> Hello, this is a patch with some updates to the Documetation/proc.txt
> file, basically it contains updates to the new files in /proc/, new
> files in /proc, and a paragraph about /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn. It's
> far from complete, but it'
>
> Note : I have a problem with my NIC : it has its MAC address set to
> 00:00:00:00:00:00 by default and I have to force it to its real MAC
> address specified in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0.
>
> I hope this report might be of any use for you (and for me ;
---Cut
> Here---
> Linux version 2.4.0-test11-ac4 (root@ummagumma) (gcc
> version 2.95.3 19991030 (prerelease)) #1 Wed Dec 27
> 03:15:22 EST 2000
Try to compile with kgcc or egcs, gcc 2.95 is not a recommended
compiler, as it's know to miscompile something
sing a realtek 8029 (ne2k-pci) that sometimes hungs, it
stops working, nothing in the logs, no more interrupts, no respond to
either ip or arp.
ifdown & ifup don't solve it, neither rmmod insmod (ne2k-pci, 8390), and
BTW a 3c503 in the same machine continues to work ok (8390 based also).
only managed to lockup the dual
machine by doing ifconfig up & down and insmod & rmmod, mostly because
the lack of documentation.
Thanks.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ey put you on the last console you where before.
This was very useful when working in the console, I use the console
sometimes, and I miss these feature.
Is there a plan to put back these keys to work, or there was a problem
of some kind and this feature got dropped?
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL P
switch to another VT I still see the contents of the first VT that I
switched from X.
Thanks for your patience.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More m
Guest section DW wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 11:33:34PM +0200, Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
>
>> Hello, good work with 2.4.x, but I miss one thing. in early 2.3.x the MS
>> keys, you know, two flags and one "properties" key worked as navigation
>> keys in
there is a race in the swap handling in SMP, and that the OOM
doesn't take into account the swap space left sometimes.
I don't know what to try next, suggestions?
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kern
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 May 2001, Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
>> Short version:
>> Under very heavy thrashing (about four hours) the system either lockups
>> or OOM handler kills a task even when there is swap space left.
>
>
> First of all,
fc ff 8b 03 e8 c5 11 ff ff 39 fb
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
.Jorge Nerin wrote:
> Hello, today I got an Oops in 2.4.4-ac6, X crashed and gdm restarted,
> my system is a dual 2x200MMX, 96Mb, Voodoo 3 2000pci XFree 4.0.3, no drm.
>
In reply to myself I must add this series of Oopses and invalid operands
to my mail, also on 2.4.4.-ac6.
The s
35 matches
Mail list logo
