Questions on rtc drivers...

2008-02-20 Thread J.A. Magallón
Hi all... since some time ago I have noticed that mplayer can't use the RTC for time accounting. Perhaps it is deprecated and should be migrated to hrtimers, that is what every reference I found said, but the fact is that nowadays it uses it. I thought I was because a misbuild of my kernel, but n

Re: [rtc-linux] state of GEN_RTC vs rtc subsystem

2008-02-21 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:03:25 +0100, Alessandro Zummo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:11:23 -0600 > Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Is the functionality provided by drivers/char/gen_rtc.c completely > > handled by the rtc subsystem in drivers/rtc? > > > > I

Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7

2008-01-07 Thread J.A. Magallón
HI all... On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:19:16 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's been two weeks since rc6, but let's face it, with xmas and new years > (and birthdays) in between, there hasn't actually been a lot of working > days, and the incremental patch from -rc6 is a

Re: PROBLEM: I/O scheduler problem with an 8 SATA disks raid 5 under heavy load ?

2008-01-08 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:52:35 +0100, Guillaume Laurès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ata5.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1f02 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen > > ata5.00: cmd 60/40:08:8f:eb:67/00:00:03:00:00/40 tag 1 cdb 0x0 data > > 32768 in > > res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask

Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7

2008-01-10 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:56:02 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > J.A. Magallón wrote: > > HI all... > > > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:19:16 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> It's been two

Re: Why is the kfree() argument const?

2008-01-18 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:24:29 +0100, Olivier Galibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 08:53:44AM -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > I'd say this implies the exact opposite. It almost sounds like the > > compiler is free to change: > > > > void foo(const int *x); > > foo(x); >

Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages

2007-12-20 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:08:53 +, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I believe though that printk messages are not sentences but are > > logging statements. Statements do not require full-stops. > > > > Opinions, of course, vary. > > I do not believe "opinions" are relevant here. Relevan

Re: Trying to convert old modules to newer kernels

2007-12-20 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:05:48 -0500, "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:27:37PM -0500, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >> > > It never get

void* arithmnetic

2007-11-28 Thread J.A. Magallón
Hi all... Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like this: include/asm/compat.h:210: warning: pointer of type 'void *' used in arithmetic There are several of this warnings. The code in question for this example is: static __inline__ void __user *compat_alloc_user_s

Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C

2007-11-30 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:29:55 +0100, "Loïc Grenié" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/11/29, Ben Crowhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development? > > > > regards, > > BPC > Well, I really would like to learn some things here, could we keep this off-to

Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C

2007-11-30 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 00:31:19 +, Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:19:50AM +0100, J.A. Magall??n wrote: > > An vtable in C++ takes exactly the same space that the function > > table pointer present in every driver nowadays... and probably > > the virtual method call

Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C

2007-11-30 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:09:45 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development? > > > > Why not C# instead ? > > Why not Haskell nor Erlang instead ? :-D > Flash http://www.lagmonster.info/humor/windowsrg.html -- J.A. Magallon

Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C

2007-12-03 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 22:13:53 +0100, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > > It just depends how many times a second it happens. For instance, consider > this trivial loop (fct is a two-function array which just return 1 or 2) : > > i = 0; > for (j = 0; j < (1 << 28); j++)

Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C

2007-12-04 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:54:13 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:19:50AM +0100, J.A. Magall??n wrote: > > I think BeOS was C++ and OSX is C+ObjectiveC (and runs on an iPhone). > > Original MacOS (fron 6 to 9) was Pascal (and a mac SE was very near > > to

Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C

2007-12-04 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 21:57:27 +, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You could write an equally effcient kernel in languages like C++, > > using C++ abstractions as a high level organization, where > > It's very very hard to generate good C code because of the numerous ways > objects get te

Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7

2008-01-13 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:10:08 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > J.A. Magallón wrote: > > It reproduces also with 2.6.23.13. > > Finally I think the problematic disk is sdc: > > Okay, then, it's less likely a regression and more likel

Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7

2008-01-14 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:57:35 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > J.A. Magallón wrote: > > I'm still pending to pysically remove the disks (or at least unplug the > > cable...), but I have realized a cusious thing: after some errors, the > > kernel is l

Re: Opteron box and 4Gb memory

2007-10-25 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:58:10 -0700, "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > J.A. Magallon wrote: > > Hi... > > > > I have some Quad-Opteron boxes with 4Gb memory and two of them are > > running two different Linux distros. > > > > Box one sees 4Gb of memory, but box two just sees 3. > > Th

Oops with touch and unknown uid [was Re: 2.6.22-rc6-mm1]

2007-07-22 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:43:21 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc6/2.6.22-rc6-mm1/ > I have noticed a funny problem. Lets say 666 is not an uid used on you system. This oopses: rm -f dummy touch dummy chown

Re: [PATCH 0/3] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers

2007-10-18 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:58:26 +0100, Denys Vlasenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Following patches debloat drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/*. > I also had to add prototypes for ahc_lookup_scb > and ahd_lookup_scb to .h files. > Sorry for the late replay, but.. working fine on annwn:~# lspci | gre

Re: Opteron box and 4Gb memory

2007-11-04 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:58:10 -0700, "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > J.A. Magallon wrote: > > Hi... > > > > I have some Quad-Opteron boxes with 4Gb memory and two of them are > > running two different Linux distros. > > > > Box one sees 4Gb of memory, but box two just sees 3. > > Th

Re: Opteron box and 4Gb memory

2007-11-05 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 13:10:46 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:18:47AM +0100, J.A. Magall?n wrote: > > Well, I was able to get about 3 Gb with MTRR=discrete in the BIOS, > > but I'm still in the process to find the 'software hole' option to get > > the

Re: Opteron box and 4Gb memory

2007-11-05 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 13:50:40 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 07:45:21PM +0100, J.A. Magall?n wrote: > > Well, problem solved... > > > > I'm going to kill all pc assemblers in the world... Someone should teach > > them > > to learn mauals before assembl

Problem with POSIX threads in latest kernel...

2007-01-15 Thread J.A. Magallón
Hi... I run the (almost) latest -mm kernel (2.6.20-rc3-mm1), and see some strange behaviour with POSIX threads (glibc-2.4). I have downgraded my test to a simple textboox example for a SMP-safe spool queue, it's just a circular queue with a mutex and a condition variable for in and out. I have se

Re: Threading...

2007-01-19 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:55:41 +0100, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 10:43 -0800, Brian McGrew wrote: > > I have a very interesting question about something that we're seeing > > happening with threading between Fedora Core 3 and Fedora Core 5. Running > > on De

Re: Problem with POSIX threads in latest kernel...

2007-01-22 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:56:30 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:47:10 +0100 "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > Hi... > > > > I run the (almost) latest -mm kernel (2.6.20-rc3-mm1), and se

Re: SMP performance degradation with sysbench

2007-02-27 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:31:29 -0500, Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hiro Yoshioka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > From: Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Hiro Yoshioka wrote: > >>> Howdy, > >>> > >>> MySQL 5.0.26 had some scalability issues and it solved since 5.0.32 > >>> http://ossipedia.i

Re: list.h , list_head and C++

2007-02-27 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:34:13 -0600, Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2:26 pm, Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> My C++ program needs an intrusive list, possibly with RCU > >>> capabilities.The data struc

Re: somebody dropped a (warning) bomb

2007-02-08 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:53:38 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > > I generally have to agree with you about the unsigned char* vs char*. It > > is a problem of the C language that char can be signed and unsigned, and > >

Re: somebody dropped a (warning) bomb

2007-02-08 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:03:06 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > But THE CALLER CANNOT AND MUST NOT CARE! Because the sign of "char" is > > implementation-defined, so if you call "strcmp()", you are already > > basical

Re: [PATCH] Re: Bio device too big | kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:537!

2007-02-12 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:26:56 +1100, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday February 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > This patch should fix the worst of the offences, but I'd like to > > experiment and think a bit more before I submit it to stable. > > And probably test it too - as y

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm1/ > > Oops plague for me :(. A l

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:31:42 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:30:17 +0100 > "J.A. Magall__n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Temporarily at > > > > > > http:/

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-16 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:30:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nope, can't reproduce (the bug, that is). > > Actually, the oops you have there is the fourth one, so we might be seeing > downstream effects of oops #1. Can you please capture the first oops > trace? Increasing t

Question on ALSA intel8x0

2007-01-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
Hi... I have a curious issue with snd_intel8x0 ALSA driver: Jan 7 01:14:27 werewolf-wl kernel: ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :00:1f.5 disabled Jan 7 01:14:27 werewolf-wl kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 21 Jan 7 01:14:27 werewolf-wl kernel: PCI:

Re: macros: "do-while" versus "({ })" and a compile-time error

2007-01-10 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:16:55 -0500, "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: > > > >> > >> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Stefan Richter wrote: > >> > >>> Robert P. J. Day wrote: >

oprofile as user

2006-11-28 Thread J.A. Magallón
Hi First of all, thanks for oprofile ! It's the first tool I can really use to profile my app, with a ton of dynamically loaded plugins and without having to link everything statically... But, it there any sane way to use it as non-root user ? Is there any alternative ? I'm even thinking of s

Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm2

2007-06-19 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:03:13 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc4/2.6.22-rc4-mm2/ > > - Basically a bugfixed version of 2.6.22-rc4-mm1. None of the subsystem > trees were repulled, several bad patches were

Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm2

2007-06-19 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:53:57 +0200, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:03:13 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc4/2.6.22-rc4-mm2/

Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm2

2007-06-20 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:23:07 +0200, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > J.A. Magallón napsal(a): > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:53:57 +0200, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:03:13 -0700, And

idle=poll burns my box [was Re: 2.6.22-rc2-mm1]

2007-05-25 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 23 May 2007 00:42:33 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc2/2.6.22-rc2-mm1/ > Don't know if it's specific to this kernel, but as I have realized it now... I booted with idle=poll to check some issues

Re: Slow Soft-RAID 5 performance

2007-07-18 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:56:11 +0100, Rui Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting a strange slow performance behavior on a recently installed > Server. Here are the details: > ... > > I can get a write throughput of 60 MB/sec on each HD by issuing the > command 'time `dd if=/dev/z

Problems with fb console [was Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm2]

2007-06-26 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 16 May 2005 02:13:02 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc4/2.6.12-rc4-mm2/ > > Hi... I have a (stupid, I suppose) problem with framebuffer console. I have builtin VESAFB in this kernel, so: werewol

Re: md device files missing at boot time

2007-07-04 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:32:55 +0200, Ingo Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > one of the systems I'm working with was changed (copied) from single (scsi - > sda1) > to multiple disk (raid1) (sdb1,sdc1 --> md0). > When I try to boot from the new created md-device it stops with: > ...

/proc/sef/fd/0 is a socket ?!

2007-04-20 Thread J.A. Magallón
Hi all... After a big update in my systems, two of them just does not let me ssh into it. It says that stdin is not a terminal. The same hapens if I try to open any terminal emulator, like aterm. It finally let me do somathing like ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] /bin/bash -i, to get a terminal, and I saw

Re: 2.6.21-mm1

2007-05-07 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Sat, 5 May 2007 01:49:55 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/ > ... > - The staircase CPU scheduler was dropped > Sorry, perhaps I missed the thread in LKML, but... why ? -- J.A. Magallon \

Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1

2007-03-20 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc4/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/ > (oops, I forgot L

Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1

2007-03-20 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/ > After applying hot-fixes, I get this: MODPOST vmlinux WARNING: init/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text betwe

Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1

2007-03-20 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:36:57 +0100, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm

Re: 2.6.21-rc4: extremely high power consumption

2007-03-21 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:29:38 +0100, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Today I heard fans running a bit too much. I checked with top, and got > no obvious power hog. And now acpi battery says: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/data/l/zaurus/oz.spitz.3541# cat > /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/state

Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1

2007-03-22 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc4/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/ > Is anybody having

Wrong IDE cable detection in libata [Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1]

2007-03-25 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/ > Libata seems to misdetect my cable. I have double-checked and the cable is 80 pin... ata1 is PATA ICH5 bus 1 with DVD-RW + ZIP and 40 pin cab

Re: 2.6.21-rc6-mm1

2007-04-24 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:35:59 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc6/2.6.21-rc6-mm1/ > > > - Lots of x86 updates > Has somthing related with PTY's changed in this kernel ? I have to enable legacy PTY handling

Re: 2.6.21-rc6-mm1

2007-04-24 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:58:01 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:10:41 +0200 "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:35:59 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

Re: 2.6.21-rc6-mm1

2007-04-25 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:22:50 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:43:21 +0200 "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:58:01 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

start_udev and devpts [Re: 2.6.21-rc6-mm1]

2007-04-25 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:50:39 +0200, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:22:50 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:43:21 +0200 "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > &

Re: start_udev and devpts [Re: 2.6.21-rc6-mm1]

2007-04-25 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:39:54 +0200, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:50:39 +0200, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > > But I think I found the problem. > In short, in /dev/pts is mounted before /dev

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1

2007-03-04 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 03:00:26 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc2/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ > nfs blocks shutdow

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1

2007-03-05 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 03:00:26 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc2/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ > > I'm also notici

i2c vs nVidia [Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1]

2007-03-05 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 03:00:26 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ > More things... Yes, this is related to nVidia driver. First of all, I'm not asking for help for a broken closed-source driver. I just want Lin

Re: [PATCH] sched: fix idle at tick

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:41:08 +1100, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 06 March 2007 18:02, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:25:36 +1100 Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > --- > > > kernel/sched.c |2

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:44:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm2/ > Does this include a fix for the NFS problem ? BTW, I have in my kernel a patch like this below, isn't it needed ? Original thread: http://mar

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 01:15:24 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:06:23 +0100 "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:44:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > &

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 01:42:40 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:38:23 +0100 "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 01:15:24 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:44:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm2/ > I have another question about i2c... The 'sensors' program gives me a stange message: w83627thf-i2c-9191-290 Can't get adapter name for bus 9

e1000 oops on boot [Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2]

2007-03-07 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:44:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm2/ > e1000 gave this on a warm boot: http://belly.cps.unizar.es/~magallon/oops/IMG_1510.JPG Any idea ? -- J.A. Magallon \ Soft

Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1

2007-03-26 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:27:09 +0100, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm

Re: Wrong IDE cable detection in libata [Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1]

2007-03-26 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:01:52 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > J.A. Magallón wrote: > > Libata seems to misdetect my cable. > > I have double-checked and the cable is 80 pin... > > Does the following patch fix your problem? > > http://articl

Inlining can be _very_bad...

2007-03-28 Thread J.A. Magallón
Hi all... I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel development (as I recall many discussions about inlining yes or no...). Testing other problems, I finally got this this issue: the same short and stupid loop lasted from 3 to 5 times more if it was in main() than if it was in a

Re: Inlining can be _very_bad...

2007-03-29 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:52:54 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:18:38AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote: > > Hi all... > > > > I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel development > > (as I recall many dis

Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm4

2007-04-03 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 22:47:45 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc5/2.6.21-rc5-mm4/ > > - The oops in git-net.patch has been fixed, so that tree has been restored. > It is huge. > > - Added the device-mapper

Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm4

2007-04-03 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:51:35 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 00:40:05 +0200 > "J.A. Magall__n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 22:47:45 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/p

Re: getting processor numbers

2007-04-03 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 22:13:07 +0200, Ingo Oeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ulrich, > > On Tuesday 03 April 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > So, anybody else has a proposal? This is a pressing issue and cannot > > wait until someday in the distant future NUMA topology information is > > easily

Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm4

2007-04-03 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:22:47 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:58:26 +0200, "J.A. =?UTF-8?B?TWFnYWxsw7Nu?=" said: > > > Anyways, I have just remembered I use the (in)famous nVidia driver. > > Will try to reproduce without it. This was more like a probe to see if > > somebod