On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 03:29:44 +1000
Ben Shelton wrote:
> We'd like to upstream our patch, but my concern is that UBIFS behaves
> differently when it knows that the flash device supports subpages. I
> have a couple of questions related to that:
>
> - I know from experience that bad things happen
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 05:30:55 +1000
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 23.04.2015 um 20:39 schrieb Josh Cartwright:
> > Is there no metadata in the UBI data structures in flash that
> > indicate the min IO boundary? Assuming no, is another option to,
> > at the time of attach, try both the min IO ac
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:36:16 +1000
Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>
> Well, I don't know about freescale specific tools, but at least I have
> an example with mtd_nandbiterrs module.
> This module is assuming it can write only the data part of a NAND page
> without modifying the OOB area (see [1]), which
>
> No, it doesn't seem to be correct.
> But it's an MLC flash, so you'll most probably need to apply this patch
> to nandbiterrs testsuite:
>
> http://code.bulix.org/f69wuu-87021
>
> This patch is flashing the block between each bitflip insertion to
> avoid multiple write without erasure (which,
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:04:15 +1000
Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Iwo,
>
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:22:11 +1000
> Iwo Mergler wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:36:16 +1000
> > Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, I don't know about free
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 13:20:38 +1100 Huang Shijie wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 04:50:27PM +1100, Iwo Mergler wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > No, it doesn't seem to be correct.
> > > But it's an MLC flash, so you'll most probably need to apply this
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
