[PATCH] /proc/cpumem

2005-02-16 Thread Itsuro Oda
-rc3-mm2 ? How do I get and examine the latest kexec/kdump ? Thanks. -- Itsuro ODA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- --- linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm2/drivers/char/mem.c 2005-02-16 15:36:31.0 +0900 +++ linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm2-test/drivers/char/mem.c2005-02-16 23:32:15.244876816 +0900 @@

Re: [PATCH] /proc/cpumem

2005-02-16 Thread Itsuro Oda
ltogether in this code path. I threw it in there to > ease the transition from the old code base to the new, but > if that code is causing issues So this is probably a good time > to start testing that. How about this ? Thanks. -- Itsuro ODA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscr

[BUG][x86-64]nmi_watchdog is not available

2005-02-16 Thread Itsuro Oda
(3) + enable_NMI_through_LVT0 (4) - check_nmi_watchdog(2) runs before enabling NMI(4). (where cpu_callin_map is already set) console log is attached. (line marked "<= debuging" are my debugging printk) Thanks. -- Itsuro ODA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] /proc/cpumem

2005-02-16 Thread Itsuro Oda
Hi, > I thought efi related data structures are of type __initdata and will be gone > after initilization. (efi.c) oops. certainly. and, devmem_is_allowed does same mistake :-) (I don't know who made it.) Thanks. -- Itsuro ODA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from th

Re: [Fastboot] Re: [PATCH] /proc/cpumem

2005-02-17 Thread Itsuro Oda
of the kexec code. So while many times I can see what needs to be > done it is hard for me to justify doing it. So a lot of times > where I will weigh in with code is when I see a particular blind spot > on the part of the implementors. I see. I would like to contribute as possible I can

Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] Reserving backup region for kexec based crashdumps.

2005-02-01 Thread Itsuro Oda
ea sounds nice to me. -- Itsuro ODA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] Reserving backup region for kexec based crashdumps.

2005-02-01 Thread Itsuro Oda
ribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Itsuro ODA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub

kdump on non-boot cpu

2005-02-02 Thread Itsuro Oda
.6.11-rc2-mm1.) -- Itsuro ODA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] Reserving backup region for kexec based crashdumps.

2005-02-02 Thread Itsuro Oda
640K backup area is. Please let me know why it is necessary. Thanks. -- Itsuro ODA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-in

Re: kdump on non-boot cpu

2005-02-03 Thread Itsuro Oda
05 12:12:32 +0530 Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 10:42, Itsuro Oda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I found the following in an old mail: > > > > >From vgoyal at in.ibm.com Thu Jan 6 07:20:43 2005 > > ... > > >2. Kd

Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] Reserving backup region for kexec based crashdumps.

2005-02-03 Thread Itsuro Oda
ic requirments to the dump kernel is that: * supply a method to access whole (valid) physical memory. * supply a method to access the saved register information. Does the kdump meet this requirment ? (I am not interesting to /proc/vmcore. Constructing the vmcore image is area of analysis tools. no

Re: [Fastboot] Re: kdump on non-boot cpu

2005-02-03 Thread Itsuro Oda
Hi, On 03 Feb 2005 02:58:02 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > Itsuro Oda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > This is not for kdump but an experience of our project(mkdump). > > The dump

Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] Reserving backup region for kexec based crashdumps.

2005-02-03 Thread Itsuro Oda
Hi, On 02 Feb 2005 07:45:11 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > > And the feedback begins :) > > Itsuro Oda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I don't like calling crash_kexec() directly in (ex.) panic(). > > It

Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] Reserving backup region for kexec based crashdumps.

2005-02-03 Thread Itsuro Oda
Hi, On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:18:56 +0900 Itsuro Oda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 5) dump kernel: export all valid physical memory (and saved register > > >information) to the user. (as /dev/oldmem /proc/vmcore ?) > > > > Or in user space, by jus

Re: [Fastboot] Re: kdump on non-boot cpu

2005-02-03 Thread Itsuro Oda
utdown > as the kernel knows enough to completely setup the apics. I see. Thank you for your explanation. Thanks. -- Itsuro ODA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More maj

Re: Query: Kdump: Core Image ELF Format

2005-03-08 Thread Itsuro Oda
bscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Itsuro ODA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To u

Re: [Fastboot] Re: Query: Kdump: Core Image ELF Format

2005-03-10 Thread Itsuro Oda
Hi, Using ELF format to construct dump information (registers, physical adress range, and physical memory etc.) is OK. It's not bad idea. But it is not necessary to indend to use a particular analysis tool. Do simple. Thanks. -- Itsuro ODA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe fro