From: Paul Bolle [mailto:pebo...@tiscali.nl]
> On ma, 2015-07-06 at 21:37 +0200, Espen Carlsen wrote:
> And you want this to read
> lrwxrwxrwx1 rootroot 35 Jul 4 18:31
> /lib/modules/4.1.0/build -> /usr/src/kernels/4.1.0
> lrwxrwxrwx
> From: Paul Bolle [mailto:pebo...@tiscali.nl]
> On wo, 2015-07-08 at 17:42 +0200, Espen Carlsen wrote:
> Wild guess: do the Ubuntu systems already have
> /lib/modules/4.1.0/build
> /lib/modules/4.1.0/source
> as symlinks to /usr/src/kernels/4.1.0 when you're buildi
> From: Paul Bolle [mailto:pebo...@tiscali.nl]
> [I resisted looking into the flood of info you included in this message.
> But this part could turn out to be interesting.]
> On ma, 2015-07-06 at 21:37 +0200, Espen Carlsen wrote:
> > This is the how BUILDROOT looks after rpmbuil
eate a new link inside the directory pointed to by the build and source
symlinks. This will break the -devel.rpm, as the build and source symlinks
will point to non existing directories after installing them.
Candidate for stable.
Signed-off-by: Espen Carlsen
---
scripts/package/mkspec | 4 ++
eate a new link inside the directory pointed to by the build and source
symlinks. This will break the -devel.rpm, as the build and source symlinks
will point to non existing directories after installing them.
Candidate for stable.
Signed-off-by: Espen Carlsen
---
scripts/package/mkspec | 4 ++
> From: Paul Bolle [mailto:pebo...@tiscali.nl] On di, 2015-06-30 at
> 13:47 +0200, Espen Carlsen wrote:
> > Fix the 'rpm-pkg' makefile target to always generate the correct
> > /usr/src/kernel/ symlink; this fails on non-RPM-native systems
> /kernels/
6 matches
Mail list logo
