First off, CC: back to me, as my machine can't handle an estimated 200
messages a day for me to sign up to the list 8-( - Anyway..
I updated my kernel to 2.4.3 when the patch was released. As I said earlier, I
noticed my timer losing a few seconds over the space of a couple of
hours. Well, I ha
Err, tried the patch you recommended me to apply to the 2.4.3 source code (not
the 2.4.3-pre6), but everything else started complaining it couldn't see
printk() any more. Any advice? Thanks...
--
/| _,.:*^*:., |\ Cheers from the Viking family,
| |_/' viking@ `\_| |
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, James Simmons wrote:
:
:>Err, tried the patch you recommended me to apply to the 2.4.3 source code
:>(not the 2.4.3-pre6), but everything else started complaining it couldn't
:>see printk() any more. Any advice? Thanks...
:
:Can you tell us your hardware configuration and yo
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
:viking wrote:
:>
:> Incidentally, Andrew, thanks for that patch.
:
:My brain is fading. Which patch was that?
Gee! 8-) and you suggested it to me! It was the patch against 2.4.3-pre6
which corrected the system clock slowing down, due to the interrupt
First off, CC: back to me, as my machine can't handle an estimated 200
messages a day for me to sign up to the list 8-( - Anyway..
I updated my kernel to 2.4.3 when the patch was released. (Tarballs -
wonderful things!)
However, I noticed that the kernel timer loses seconds over time with both t
5 matches
Mail list logo