Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests: ntsync: fix the wrong condition in wake_all

On Saturday, 15 March 2025 04:39:46 CDT Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 05:13:50PM -0500, Elizabeth Figura wrote: > > On Friday, 14 March 2025 05:14:30 CDT Su Hui wrote: > > > On 2025/3/14 17:21, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at

Re: [PATCH 3/4] selftests: ntsync: update config

nfig > @@ -1 +1 @@ > -CONFIG_WINESYNC=y > +CONFIG_NTSYNC=y > Reviewed-by: Elizabeth Figura

Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests: ntsync: fix the wrong condition in wake_all

uto_event_args); > - EXPECT_EQ(0, objs[3]); > + EXPECT_LE(0, objs[3]); > > wait_args.timeout = get_abs_timeout(1000); > wait_args.objs = (uintptr_t)objs; > Reviewed-by: Elizabeth Figura

Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests: ntsync: fix the wrong condition in wake_all

On Friday, 14 March 2025 05:14:30 CDT Su Hui wrote: > On 2025/3/14 17:21, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 03:14:51PM +0800, Su Hui wrote: > >> When 'manual=false' and 'signaled=true', then expected value when using > >> NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_EVENT should be greater than zero. Fix thi

Re: [PATCH 2/4] selftests: ntsync: avoid possible overflow in 32-bit machine

rn ((__u64)timeout.tv_sec * 10) + timeout.tv_nsec + (ms * > 100); > } > > static int wait_for_thread(pthread_t thread, unsigned int ms) > Reviewed-by: Elizabeth Figura