Re: [PATCH] fill in missing pv_mmu_ops entries for PAGETABLE_LEVELS >= 3

On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 04:19:09PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 03:20:15PM -0200, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This small series provides some more fixes towards the goal > > to have the PARAVIRT selectable for x86_64. After that, just > > some more s

Re: [PATCH 0/4] paravirt_ops-64 compile fixes

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:02:07PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Eduardo Habkost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This series contain fixes to make the paravirt_ops code compile and > > boot on x86_64. > > > > This is a follow-up for the previous series from Glauber. > > thanks Eduardo, i've

[PATCH 1/2] Allow enabling PARAVIRT without any guest implementation

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Eduardo Pereira Habkost wrote: > >If this is desirable for broader testing, we can make config PARAVIRT > >visible and selectable on menuconfig, even when there is no guest > >implementation being en

[PATCH 2/2] Remove depends on X86_32 from PARAVIRT & PARAVIRT_GUEST

With this, the paravirt_ops code can be enabled on x86_64 also. Each guest implementation (Xen, VMI, lguest) now depends on X86_32. The dependencies can be dropped for each one when they start to support x86_64. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/x86/Kconfig|