Re: [PATCH 5.0 39/93] perf top: Delete the evlist before perf_session, fixing heap-use-after-free issue

2019-04-18 Thread Dan Rue
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 07:57:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > [ Upstream commit 0dba9e4be95b59e77060645ca8e37ca3231061f5 ] > > The evlist should be destroyed before the perf session. > > Detected with gcc's ASan: > > = >

Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/23] 4.19.40-stable review

2019-05-04 Thread Dan Rue
On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 12:25:02PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.40 release. > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know

Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review

2019-05-04 Thread Dan Rue
On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.0.13 release. > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review

2019-05-05 Thread Dan Rue
On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 08:31:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 5/4/19 8:05 PM, Dan Rue wrote: > > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.0.13 release. > > > There are 32 patch

Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/23] 4.19.40-stable review

2019-05-05 Thread Dan Rue
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 11:02:36AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 02:23:22PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Sun, 5 May 2019 at 12:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 10:00:44PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/21] 4.4.189-stable review

2019-08-10 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 03:45:04PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.189 release. > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know

Re: [PATCH 5.2 000/413] 5.2.3-stable review

2019-07-25 Thread Dan Rue
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:30:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 25/07/19 18:20, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:10:37PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> On 25/07/19 18:09, Sean Christopherson wrote: > This investigation confirms it is a new test code failure on st

Re: [PATCH 5.2 000/413] 5.2.3-stable review

2019-07-25 Thread Dan Rue
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 07:06:19PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 25/07/19 18:39, Dan Rue wrote: > > To your point Paolo - reporting 'fail' because of a missing kernel > > feature is a generic problem we see across test suites, and causes tons > > of pain and mis

Re: selftests: bpf: test_libbpf.sh failed at file test_l4lb.o

2019-06-24 Thread Dan Rue
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:32:25AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 9:17 AM Dan Rue wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:17:04PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:08 AM Naresh Kamboju > > > wrot

Re: selftests: bpf: test_libbpf.sh failed at file test_l4lb.o

2019-06-25 Thread Dan Rue
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 12:58:15PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 12:53 PM Dan Rue wrote: > > > > I would say if it's not possible to check at runtime, and it requires > > clang 9.0, that this test should not be enabled by default. &g

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/70] 4.4.158-stable review

2018-09-24 Thread Dan Rue
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 01:51:59PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.158 release. > There are 70 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/111] 4.9.129-stable review

2018-09-24 Thread Dan Rue
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 01:51:27PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.129 release. > There are 111 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me kno

Re: [PATCH 4.18 164/235] pinctrl: pinmux: Return selector to the pinctrl driver

2018-09-24 Thread Dan Rue
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 01:52:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. I bisected a boot failure on an x15 (arm) board to this commit on 4.18.10-rc1. I'm also seeing issues on 4.14 and 4.18 with arm64 boards hikey and drag

Re: [PATCH 4.18 164/235] pinctrl: pinmux: Return selector to the pinctrl driver

2018-09-24 Thread Dan Rue
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 06:07:10PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 01:52:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > I bisected a boot failure on an x15 (arm) board to this commit on >

Re: [PATCH 4.18 000/235] 4.18.10-stable review

2018-09-25 Thread Dan Rue
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:07:11AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 01:49:46PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.18.10 release. > > There are 235 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/173] 4.14.72-stable review

2018-09-25 Thread Dan Rue
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:07:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 01:50:34PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.72 release. > > There are 173 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this

Re: [PATCH 4.18 000/123] 4.18.6-stable review

2018-09-05 Thread Dan Rue
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:08:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On 5 September 2018 at 01:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 06:55:44PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.18.6 release. > >> There are 123 patches i

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/94] 4.9.131-stable review

2018-10-03 Thread Dan Rue
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 06:24:14AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.131 release. > There are 94 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know

Re: [PATCH 4.18 000/228] 4.18.12-stable review

2018-10-03 Thread Dan Rue
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 06:21:37AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.18.12 release. > There are 228 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me kno

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/137] 4.14.74-stable review

2018-10-03 Thread Dan Rue
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 06:23:21AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.74 release. > There are 137 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me kno

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/47] 4.4.155-stable review

2018-09-09 Thread Dan Rue
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 11:17:03AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:22:27AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On 8 September 2018 at 02:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.155 release. > > > There are 47 patch

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/95] 4.9.96-stable review

2018-04-23 Thread Dan Rue
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:01:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 06:57:50PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:23:49PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > On 22 April 2018 at 19:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > wrote: > > > > This is the start o

Re: [PATCH 4.14 064/109] dmaengine: bcm2835-dma: Use vchan_terminate_vdesc() instead of desc_free

2018-03-16 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:23:33PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Peter Ujfalusi > > > [ Upstream commit de92436ac40ffe9933230aa503e24dbb5ede9201 ] > > To avoid race with vchan_co

Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/128] 4.15.11-stable review

2018-03-18 Thread Dan Rue
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:15:23PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:25:26AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:22:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.11 release. > > > There a

Re: [PATCH 4.14 056/109] clk: ti: clkctrl: add support for retrying failed init

2018-03-18 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:23:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Tero Kristo > > > [ Upstream commit 729e13bf58e643b9accd2a14c55b555958702fb0 ] > > In case the clkctrl node conta

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/109] 4.14.28-stable review

2018-03-19 Thread Dan Rue
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:14:42PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:24:54AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:22:29PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.28 release. > > > There a

Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/128] 4.15.11-stable review

2018-03-19 Thread Dan Rue
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:15:23PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:25:26AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:22:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.11 release. > > > There a

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/66] 4.9.95-stable review

2018-04-19 Thread Dan Rue
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 06:00:52PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On 19 April 2018 at 17:39, Ben Hutchings > wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 16:42 +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > >> > > >> > Can you try 'git bisect'? I'll hold off on releasing 4.9.y until this > >> > gets figured out. > >> > >>

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/66] 4.9.95-stable review

2018-04-19 Thread Dan Rue
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:03:05PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:42:56PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > > > > Can you try 'git bisect'? I'll hold off on releasing 4.9.y until this > > > gets figured out. > > > > After reverting this patch, network started works

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/66] 4.9.95-stable review

2018-04-18 Thread Dan Rue
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 05:58:33PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.95 release. > There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/166] 4.14.200-rc1 review

2020-09-30 Thread Dan Rue
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:58:32PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.200 release. > There are 166 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me kn

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/121] 4.9.238-rc1 review

2020-09-30 Thread Dan Rue
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:59:04PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.238 release. > There are 121 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me kno

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/85] 4.4.238-rc1 review

2020-09-30 Thread Dan Rue
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:59:27PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.238 release. > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know

Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/16] 5.4.63-rc1 review

2020-09-05 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 03:29:53PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.63 release. > There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [PATCH 5.8 00/17] 5.8.7-rc1 review

2020-09-05 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 03:29:59PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.7 release. > There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/130] 5.4.66-rc2 review

2020-09-15 Thread Dan Rue
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 06:45:55PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.66 release. > There are 130 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know

Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/130] 5.4.66-rc2 review

2020-09-15 Thread Dan Rue
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:31:17PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:17:32PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 06:45:55PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.66 release. > > &g

Re: selftests: bpf: test_libbpf.sh failed at file test_l4lb.o

2019-06-21 Thread Dan Rue
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:17:04PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:08 AM Naresh Kamboju > wrote: > > > > selftests: bpf test_libbpf.sh failed running Linux -next kernel > > 20190618 and 20190619. > > > > Here is the log from x86_64, > > # selftests bpf test_libbpf.sh > >

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: teach kselftest-merge to find nested config files

2019-05-30 Thread Dan Rue
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 07:56:41PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:16:14AM -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > > Current implementation of kselftest-merge only finds config files that > > are one level deep using `$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/*/config`. > > &g

Re: [PATCH 5.1 000/405] 5.1.6-stable review

2019-05-31 Thread Dan Rue
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 07:59:58PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.1.6 release. > There are 405 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [PATCH 5.0 000/346] 5.0.20-stable review

2019-05-31 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 06:20:43AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 09:53:33PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 08:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.0.20 release. > > > There are 346

Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API

2018-02-20 Thread Dan Rue
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 10:32:12AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko > > Hugetlb allocator has several layer of allocation functions depending > and the purpose of the allocation. There are two allocators depending > on whether the page can be allocated from the page allocator or we

Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API

2018-02-21 Thread Dan Rue
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:01:07AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 21-02-18 10:55:26, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 20-02-18 22:24:57, Dan Rue wrote: > [...] > > > I bisected the failure to this commit. The problem is seen on multiple > > > architec

Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API

2018-02-21 Thread Dan Rue
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 07:52:52PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 21-02-18 10:19:14, Dan Rue wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:01:07AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Wed 21-02-18 10:55:26, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Tue 20-02-18 22:24:57, Dan Rue

Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/163] 4.15.5-stable review

2018-02-21 Thread Dan Rue
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:47:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.5 release. > There are 163 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/77] 4.9.83-stable review

2018-02-21 Thread Dan Rue
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:48:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.83 release. > There are 77 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/23] 4.15.3-stable review

2018-02-09 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:39:58PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.3 release. > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [kselftests] compaction_test is blocked

2018-02-09 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:53:59PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote: > Hi > > kselftests is integrated Intel 0Day project. > Sometimes we found compaction_test is blocked for more than 1 hours until i > kill it. > > Try to figure out where it is running, i added some log to this case. > > the test log i

Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/22] 4.14.19-stable review

2018-02-09 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:39:49PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.19 release. > There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/92] 4.9.81-stable review

2018-02-09 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:38:29PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.81 release. > There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/193] 4.4.118-stable review

2018-02-23 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:23:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.118 release. > There are 193 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me kno

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/159] 4.14.22-stable review

2018-02-23 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:25:08PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.22 release. > There are 159 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me kno

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/145] 4.9.84-stable review

2018-02-24 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:25:06PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.84 release. > There are 145 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know

Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/45] 4.15.6-stable review

2018-02-24 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:28:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.6 release. > There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/67] 4.4.115-stable review

2018-02-02 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:57:29PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.115 release. > There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know

Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/86] 4.9.80-stable review

2018-02-02 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:57:20PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.80 release. > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/156] 4.14.17-stable review

2018-02-02 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:56:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.17 release. > There are 156 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me kno

Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/55] 4.15.1-stable review

2018-02-02 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:58:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.1 release. > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: selftests/x86/fsgsbase_64 test problem

2018-02-27 Thread Dan Rue
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:30:05AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/29/18 10:26, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >>> > >>> That will utterly suck on non-UMIP machines that have > >>> hypervisor-provided UMIP emulation. > >> > >> Is that a valid thing to optimize for, especially given that paranoid > >

Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/64] 4.14.18-stable review

2018-02-05 Thread Dan Rue
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:22:19AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.18 release. > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know

Re: [PATCH 4.15 00/60] 4.15.2-stable review

2018-02-05 Thread Dan Rue
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:22:33AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.2 release. > There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [PATCH 4.14 023/159] mm/sparsemem: Allocate mem_section at runtime for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y

2017-12-22 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Kirill A. Shutemov > > commit 83e3c48729d9ebb7af5a31a504f3fd6aff0348c4 upstream. > > Size of the mem_section[] arr

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/159] 4.14.9-stable review

2017-12-22 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:44:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.9 release. > There are 159 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/104] 4.9.72-stable review

2017-12-22 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 05:02:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:45:26AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.72 release. > > There are 104 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this o

Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/164] 4.14.6-stable review

2017-12-15 Thread Dan Rue
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:13:47AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > Hi Naresh, > > >> Results from Linaro’s test farm. > >> No regressions on arm64 and x86_64. > >> armv7 beagleboard x15 results are not available due to infrastructure > >> issues. > >> > >> Note: > >> Newly added selftests/net/reusepor

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/104] 4.9.54-stable review

2017-10-10 Thread Dan Rue
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:11:55AM +, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 03:37:43PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > >> kernel: 4.9.54-rc1 > > >> git repo: > > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stabl

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/104] 4.9.54-stable review

2017-10-10 Thread Dan Rue
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 03:33:47PM +, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:23:00AM -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:11:55AM +, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 03:37:43PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > > > &g

Re: [Lkft-triage] [PATCH 4.9 000/138] 4.9.66-stable review

2017-11-29 Thread Dan Rue
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:35:15AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:07:02AM +, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:07:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:07:01PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > > > > Results from L

<    1   2