ncfg - in my case - is 0 and I suppose, that size
of the leastest slab cache can become(in future) smaller than
sizeof(struct usb_host_config).
Thanks for attention.
--
Dan Kruchinin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
ta after 'channel_table' (at offset 0x40)
WARNING: drivers/dma/async_tx.o - Section mismatch: reference to
.init.data: from .data after 'channel_table' (at offset 0x44)
--
Dan Kruchinin.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the b
num_ep;
+ len = sizeof(struct usb_host_endpoint);
+ if (num_ep > 0)
+ len *= num_ep;
+
alt->endpoint = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!alt->endpoint)
return -ENOMEM;
-------
Dan Kruchinin.
-
To unsubscribe from this list
WARN_ON_ONCE(size == 0);
in include/linux/slub_def.h: kmalloc_index.
btw: as I know when kmalloc(0) both slub and slab allocate the
smallest possible size. Can this size be smaller than sizeof(struct
usb_host_endpoint)? If it is, may it be a problem?
thanks.
Dan Kruchinin.
It has recently been
On 3/20/07, Chris Friesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Asgard wrote:
> btw, can you describe your aim in details?
I'm doing some work on a network device driver. We were having jumbo
frame issues after being up for a month or so because it couldn't
allocate enough contiguous memory.
We've got a
this function)
scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/checklist.c:298: error: 'KEY_RIGHT'
undeclared (first use in this function)
scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/checklist.c:310: warning: implicit
declaration of function ' on_key_esc'
/vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
I have just the same tracing, but my gnome desktop works pretty good
until I launch some application which "eats" much mem, like evince or
firefox. After it my X server automatically restarts .
Dan Kruchi
interrupts at 1024Hz.
[126588.517198] rtc: lost some interrupts at 1024Hz.
[126588.535923] rtc: lost some interrupts at 1024Hz.
[126588.554643] rtc: lost some interrupts at 1024Hz.
cat /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq
64
On 2.6.20 there wasn't such problem.
Thanks.
Dan Kruchinin.
-
To
; GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
Apr 29 23:31:16 midgard kernel: [18014366.939965] sky2 eth0: enabling interface
Apr 29 23:31:16 midgard kernel: [18014366.941763] sky2 eth0: ram buffer 48K
Apr 29 23:31:16 midgard kernel: [18014367.006976] ohci1394: fw-host0:
OHCI-1394 1.0 (PCI): IRQ=[19] MMIO=[9000-
On 4/30/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Please don't drop addresses from the CC list]
On Sunday, 29 April 2007 22:46, Dan Kruchinin wrote:
> On 4/30/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sunday, 29 April 200
4:15:09 MSD 2007 i686 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ./a.out
Trying to cause ELF core dump...
All is bad. We don't receive SIGSEGV and core dump hasn't occured. (WHY?!)
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -a
Linux midgard 2.6.21-rc7 #5 SMP Wed May 2 02:11:50 MSD 2007 i686 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
11 matches
Mail list logo