e consider this patch
Thanks,
--
"I may be a monkey, Crutcher Dunnavant
but I'm a monkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with ambition!"Red Hat OS Development
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
oops,
make that http://bama.ua.edu/~dunna001/sysrq-register-0.7.tar.bz2
--
"I may be a monkey, Crutcher Dunnavant
but I'm a monkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with ambition!"Red Hat OS Development
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
srq.txt necessary to fully describe the interface,
though it is pretty clear in the code.
the affected files are:
include/linux/sysrq.h
drivers/char/sysrq.c
kernel/ksyms.c
arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
--
"I may be a monkey, Crutcher Dunnavant
but I'm a monkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
__sysrq_put_key_op(i + '0', &dumpfake_op);
}
}
__sysrq_table_unlock();
}
int init_module (void) {
REGISTER_SYSRQ_KEY('f', &overload_op);
printk("<1>overload example loaded\n");
return
id cleanup_module (void) {
int i;
if (overloaded) {
__sysrq_table_lock();
for (i=0;i<10;i++) __sysrq_put_key_op(i + '0', op_stash[i]);
__sysrq_table_unlock();
}
UNREGISTER_SYSRQ_KEY('f&
ules a bit, and fixed an SMP problem one of them had.
I really think that this would make a good addition to the kernel, and it touches a
relatively small amount of code. Please examine this, and tell me what you think.
--
"I may be a monkey, Crutcher Dunnavant
but I'm a monkey
t, since Windoze can read and write
> to this drive currently. Our implementation should be compatible.
>
> Cheers,
> Miles
>
It would seem, to me, that if the partitions exist, but are conflicted,
yet windows sees them as a single drive; then windows is misbehaving,
and probab
++ 19/07/01 18:44 +0300 - Cornel Ciocirlan:
> a) more efficient packet filtering. After a cache entry is created for a
> flow, we apply the ACLs for the packet and associate the action with the
> flow. All subsequent packets belonging to the same flow will be
> dropped/accepted without re-appying
Crutcher Dunnavant
On Oct 18, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
1) He has been told "recreate the problem, hit alt-sysreq-
cokebottle,
and send me the results". He has a mission, and the only feedback
he
needs is (a) that he hit co
10 matches
Mail list logo
