On 1/30/2018 11:33 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi Asutosh,
On 1/30/2018 10:11 AM, Asutosh Das wrote:
From: Subhash Jadavani
UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_UFS_HCI_VERSION is only applicable for QCOM UFS host
controller version 2.x.y and this has been fixed from version 3.x.y
onwards, hence this change
On 5/6/2018 3:44 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
In the right behavior, setting the bit to '0' indicates clear and
'1' indicates no change. If host controller handles this the other way,
UFSHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_REQ_LIST_CLR can be used.
Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon
Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar
---
drivers/
On 4/7/2021 3:21 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 6/04/21 8:52 pm, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun
during its runtime-suspend.
During the
Hi Stanley,
On 5/16/2020 10:46 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
The commit "scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster flush during runtime
suspend" promises essential resource, i.e., for UFS devices doing
WriteBooster buffer flush and Auto BKOPs. However if device
finishes its job but not resumed for a very long time,
On 7/29/2020 6:02 AM, Can Guo wrote:
Hi Asutosh,
On 2020-07-29 02:06, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 7/27/2020 10:00 PM, Can Guo wrote:
Sometime dumps in IRQ handler are heavy enough to cause system stability
issues, move them to error handler.
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
---
drivers/scsi/ufs
Hi Pedro,
On 11/11/2019 7:54 AM, Pedro Sousa wrote:
Hi Asutosh,
Please check comments.
Sorry for missing out on this and thanks for your review.
-Original Message-
From: Asutosh Das
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 5:49 PM
To: c...@codeaurora.org; rna...@codeaurora.org; vinholika
Hi Avri,
On 5/20/2020 2:33 PM, Avri Altman wrote:
Hi,
Qualcomm controller needs to be in hibern8 before scaling clocks.
This change puts the controller in hibern8 state before scaling
and brings it out after scaling of clocks.
Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das
I guess that your previous
On 8/3/2020 2:04 AM, Can Guo wrote:
Sometime dumps in IRQ handler are heavy enough to cause system stability
issues, move them to error handler and only print basic host regs here.
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
Reviewed-by: Bean Huo
---
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 23
On 12/24/2020 5:47 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
Hi Avri, Bean,
On Thu, 2020-12-24 at 13:01 +0100, Bean Huo wrote:
On Thu, 2020-12-24 at 11:03 +, Avri Altman wrote:
Do you see any substantial benefit of having
fWriteBoosterBufferFlushEn
disabled?
1. The definition of fWriteBoosterBufferFlushEn
On 3/23/2021 12:19 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 23/03/21 5:13 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/22/2021 11:12 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 22/03/21 9:53 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/19/2021 10:47 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 19/03/21 2:35 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of
On 3/18/2021 7:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 7:37 AM Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 16/03/21 10:35 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/16/2021 12:48 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 16/03/21 12:22 am, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/14/2021 1:11 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 10/03
On 3/18/2021 10:54 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 6:33 PM Asutosh Das (asd)
wrote:
On 3/18/2021 7:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 7:37 AM Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 16/03/21 10:35 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/16/2021 12:48 AM, Adrian Hunter
On 3/15/2021 7:29 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 12/03/21 12:19 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU to wlun during its runtime-suspend.
During the process
On 3/18/2021 12:16 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 18/03/21 7:58 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/18/2021 10:54 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 6:33 PM Asutosh Das (asd)
wrote:
On 3/18/2021 7:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 7:37 AM Adrian Hunter
On 3/18/2021 8:12 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 3/18/21 5:35 PM, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU to wlun during its runtime-suspend.
During the process
On 3/22/2021 11:12 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 22/03/21 9:53 pm, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/19/2021 10:47 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 19/03/21 2:35 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them
On 3/21/2021 2:57 PM, Nitin Rawat wrote:
Add a vops to configure VCC voltage VCC voltage level
for platform supporting both ufs2.x and ufs 3.x devices.
Suggested-by: Stanley Chu
Suggested-by: Asutosh Das
Suggested-by: Bjorn Andersson
Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat
Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao
On 3/19/2021 10:47 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 19/03/21 2:35 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU to wlun during its runtime-suspend.
During the process
On 3/14/2021 1:11 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 10/03/21 5:04 am, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/9/2021 7:56 AM, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/8/2021 9:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:21 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 5:17 PM Alan Stern wrote
On 3/15/2021 7:29 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 12/03/21 12:19 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU to wlun during its runtime-suspend.
During the process
On 3/16/2021 12:48 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 16/03/21 12:22 am, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/14/2021 1:11 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 10/03/21 5:04 am, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/9/2021 7:56 AM, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/8/2021 9:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021
On 4/15/2021 4:11 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 4/14/21 11:58 AM, Asutosh Das wrote:
[ ... ]
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the comments. I will fix the comments in the next version.
The following code is executed before ufshcd_async_scan() is called:
dev = hba->
On 3/31/2021 11:19 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 31/03/21 1:31 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun
during its runtime-suspend.
During the
On 4/19/2021 11:37 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 16/04/21 10:49 pm, Asutosh Das wrote:
Co-developed-by: Can Guo
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das
---
I came across 3 issues while testing. See comments below.
Hi Adrian
Thanks for the comments.
@@ -5794,7 +5839,7
On 4/9/2021 3:07 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 9/04/21 5:27 am, Daejun Park wrote:
Hi Asutosh Das,
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun
during its runtime
On 11/16/2020 11:04 PM, Can Guo wrote:
When AH8 error happens, all the regs and states are dumped in err handler.
Sometime we need to look into host regs right after AH8 error happens,
which is before leaving the IRQ handler.
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
---
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
drivers
On 11/30/2020 1:16 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
UFS specficication allows different VCC configurations for UFS devices,
for example,
(1). 2.70V - 3.60V (By default)
(2). 1.70V - 1.95V (Activated if "vcc-supply-1p8" is declared in
device tree)
(3). 2.40
On 11/26/2020 5:58 PM, Can Guo wrote:
Instead of making the scale down gear a hard code, make it a member of
ufs_clk_scaling struct.
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
---
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 12 +++-
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 9
On 11/25/2020 6:01 PM, Can Guo wrote:
Remove the param skip_ref_clk from __ufshcd_setup_clocks(), but keep a flag
in struct ufs_clk_info to tell whether a clock can be disabled or not while
the link is active.
Reviewed-by: Hongwu Su
Reviewed-by: Bean Huo
Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu
Signed-off-by:
On 11/30/2020 10:11 AM, Bean Huo wrote:
From: Bean Huo
Currently we let UFS WriteBooster driver use clock scaling
up/down to set WB on/off, for the platform which doesn't
support UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING, WB will be always on. Provide
a sysfs attribute to enable/disable WB during runtime.
Signed
On 11/30/2020 3:14 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon 30 Nov 16:51 CST 2020, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 11/30/2020 1:16 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
UFS specficication allows different VCC configurations for UFS devices,
for example,
(1). 2.70V - 3.60V (By default)
(2). 1.70V
On 11/25/2020 6:01 PM, Can Guo wrote:
If we want to disable clocks to save power but still keep the link active,
core_clk_unipro, as same as ref_clk, should not be the one being disabled.
Reviewed-by: Hongwu Su
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
---
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs
in_use shall
evetually be cleared in __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() invoked by the full
reset and restore from err_handler.
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
---
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 55 ---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 2 ++
2
On 11/16/2020 11:04 PM, Can Guo wrote:
Serialize eh_work with system PM events and async scan to make sure eh_work
does not run in parallel with them.
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
---
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 64
On 11/30/2020 5:25 PM, Stanley Chu wrote:
On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 15:54 -0800, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 11/30/2020 3:14 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon 30 Nov 16:51 CST 2020, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 11/30/2020 1:16 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
UFS specficication allows different VCC
On 11/30/2020 6:53 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon 30 Nov 17:54 CST 2020, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 11/30/2020 3:14 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon 30 Nov 16:51 CST 2020, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 11/30/2020 1:16 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
UFS specficication allows different VCC
history functions
scsi: ufs: Introduce notify_event variant function
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 122 ++
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 82 -
2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
Hi Stanley,
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson
Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu
---
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c | 16
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c
index a6f76399b3ae..09e2f04bf4f6 10064
On 11/30/2020 7:11 PM, Can Guo wrote:
On 2020-12-01 07:01, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 11/25/2020 6:01 PM, Can Guo wrote:
Remove the param skip_ref_clk from __ufshcd_setup_clocks(), but keep
a flag
in struct ufs_clk_info to tell whether a clock can be disabled or not
while
the link is active
On 12/2/2020 8:20 AM, Bean Huo wrote:
On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 15:19 -0800, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ pm_runtime_get_sync(hba->dev);
+ res = ufshcd_wb_ctrl(hba, wb_enable);
Say, a platform supports clock-scaling and this bit is toggled.
The control g
On 3/10/2021 8:27 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 08:04:53PM -0800, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/9/2021 7:14 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 07:04:34PM -0800, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
Hello
I & Can (thanks CanG) debugged this further:
Looks like this issue
On 3/4/2021 7:35 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 3/03/21 12:52 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU to wlun during its runtime-suspend.
During the process
On 3/8/2021 9:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:21 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 5:17 PM Alan Stern wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 06:54:24PM -0800, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
Now during my testing I see a weird issue sometimes (1 in 7).
Scenario
On 3/9/2021 7:56 AM, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 3/8/2021 9:17 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:21 PM Rafael J. Wysocki
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 5:17 PM Alan Stern
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 06:54:24PM -0800, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
Now during my testing
On 3/9/2021 7:14 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 07:04:34PM -0800, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
Hello
I & Can (thanks CanG) debugged this further:
Looks like this issue can occur if the sd probe is asynchronous.
Essentially, the sd_probe() is done asynchronously
On 12/8/2020 5:56 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
Since more and more statements showing up in ufshcd_vops_device_reset(),
uninline it to allow compiler making possibly better optimization.
Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu
---
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 27
On 2/8/2019 8:07 AM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
Hi Alamy,
On 2/8/2019 1:00 AM, Alamy Liu wrote:
It says in B.2.1 in the JESD84-B51.pdf (I don't have JESD84-B51A.pdf):
/The TDL is located in a memory location known to the CQE, and is
comprised of up to 32 fixed-size slots. Each slot is compr
On 1/24/2019 5:16 PM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
Hi Asutosh,
Thanks for the patch!
On 1/24/19 09:01, Asutosh Das wrote:
Adapt to the new ICB framework for bus bandwidth voting.
It's actually called interconnect API or interconnect framework.
Thanks! will change it.
This requires the s
On 1/24/2019 10:22 PM, Evan Green wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:02 PM Asutosh Das wrote:
Adapt to the new ICB framework for bus bandwidth voting.
This requires the source/destination port ids.
Also this requires a tuple of values.
The tuple is for two different paths - from UFS master
("scsi: ufs: Add write booster feature support")
Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 35 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/uf
Hi Jeffrey
On 5/25/2020 3:19 PM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:29 PM Asutosh Das wrote:
Currently, the frequency that devfreq provides the
driver to set always leads the clocks to be scaled up.
Hence, round the clock-rate to the nearest frequency
before deciding to scale
s-sysfs.c | 13 -
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 2 +-
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c| 99 +---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h| 3 +-
4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
This set looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
--
The Qualcomm I
On 5/8/2020 10:15 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
Allow flush threshold for WriteBooster to be customizable by
vendors. To achieve this, make the value as a variable in struct
ufs_hba first.
Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 6 --
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 1 +
2 files
On 5/12/2020 3:47 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
Currently UFS host driver promises VCC supply if UFS device
needs to do WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend.
However the UFS specification mentions,
"While the flushing operation is in progress, the device is
in Active power mode."
Therefore UFS h
On 5/14/2020 7:49 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
Hi Asutosh,
On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 10:23 +0800, Stanley Chu wrote:
Hi Asutosh,
On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 12:31 -0700, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 5/12/2020 3:47 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
Currently UFS host driver promises VCC supply if UFS device
needs to do
On 5/14/2020 8:01 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
Currently UFS host driver promises VCC supply if UFS device
needs to do WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend.
However the UFS specification mentions,
"While the flushing operation is in progress, the device is
in Active power mode."
Therefore UFS h
vri Altman
Signed-off-by: Qinglang Miao
---
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
v2: consider missing destroy_workqueue ufshcd_remove either.
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index b8f573a02713..ad
corrsponding sysfs entries.
Fix it by adding a sanity check of parameter offset against the actual
decriptor length.
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
---
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a
ungate work is
queued. To make sure scsi_block_reqs_cnt is handled by ufshcd_hold() and
ufshcd_ungate_work() in a paired way, increase it only if queue_work()
returns true.
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
Reviewed-by: Hongwu Su
---
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 6 +++---
1
de
the callback, but do not do the reset operation should return -EOPNOTSUPP.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c | 4 +++-
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 6 --
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 11 +++
3 files chang
med that UFS devices with wspecversion >= 0x310 support
DeepSleep.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter
---
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-ufs | 34 +++
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c | 7
drivers/scsi/ufs
during debug. In addition, this change
makes cleanup to some prints in ufshcd_print_host_regs as similar prints
are already available in ufshcd_print_host_state.
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
Reviewed-by: Avri Altman
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 31
On 7/27/2020 10:00 PM, Can Guo wrote:
Sometime dumps in IRQ handler are heavy enough to cause system stability
issues, move them to error handler.
Signed-off-by: Can Guo
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 31 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
dif
aps |= UFSHCD_CAP_WB_EN;
+ hba->vps->wb_flush_threshold = UFS_WB_BUF_REMAIN_PERCENT(80);
/*
* ufshcd_vops_init() is invoked after
Patchset looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Coll
Hi Stanley,
On 5/12/2020 3:47 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
Currently UFS host driver promises VCC supply if UFS device
needs to do WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend.
However the UFS specification mentions,
"While the flushing operation is in progress, the device is
in Active power mode."
Th
On 5/12/2020 9:21 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Hi Asutosh!
Patchset looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
When you want to approve an entire series, please respond to the cover
letter email. Otherwise the kernel.org tooling will only record the tag
for the individual patch you are
an be simplified to "else" since both have the same meaning.
This patch does not change any functionality.
Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu
Reviewed-by: Avri Altman
---
The whole series looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 20 +++-
1
On 2/21/2018 6:48 PM, Stanislav Nijnikov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linux-scsi-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-scsi-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Asutosh Das
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 6:57 AM
To: subha...@codeaurora.org; c...@codeaurora.org;
vivek.gau
On 2/23/2018 10:40 AM, Kyuho Choi wrote:
Hi Asutosh,
I've simple question in below.
On 2/21/18, Asutosh Das wrote:
From: Yaniv Gardi
Due to M-PHY issues, moving from HS to any other mode or gear or
even Hibern8 causes some un-predicted behavior of the device.
This patch fixes this i
On 2/24/2018 5:27 AM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 5:56 AM, Asutosh Das wrote:
From: Vijay Viswanath
UFS driver can receive a request during memory reclaim by kswapd.
So when ufs driver puts the ungate work in queue, and if there are no
idle workers, kthreadd is invoked to
g] On Behalf Of Asutosh Das
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 6:54 AM
To: subha...@codeaurora.org; c...@codeaurora.org;
vivek.gau...@codeaurora.org; rna...@codeaurora.org;
vinholika...@gmail.com; j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com;
martin.peter...@oracle.com
Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; Venkat Gopalakrishnan
; As
On 2/2/2018 8:53 AM, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 1/31/2018 1:09 PM, Avri Altman wrote:
Hi,
Can you elaborate how this can even happen?
Isn't the interrupt aggregation capability should attend for those cases?
Thanks,
Avri
-Original Message-
From: linux-scsi-ow...@vger.kerne
atic_key_false(inline)
-025|trace_workqueue_execute_end(inline)
-025|process_one_work()
-026|worker_thread()
-027|kthread()
-028|ret_from_fork(asm)
---|end of frame
Please can you check if this is actually a bug and my understanding is
correct.
If so, I can put up a patch for the same.
--
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Asutosh Das (asd)
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
101 - 174 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
