Re: PROBLEM:Bug when installing NVidia Driver Module

2001-04-02 Thread Aric Cyr
I have tried out the latest NVidia driver set, and they do work fine for me with plain vanilla 2.4.3 on my Athlon with GCC 2.95.3. I would blame your compiler, it's dated July 2000, that's an old CVS version AFAIK. - Aric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

Re: PROBLEM:Bug when installing NVidia Driver Module

2001-04-02 Thread Aric Cyr
According to the kernel soruces, _mmx_memcpy is only defined when Athlon is selected... I noticed that you are using GCC 2.96... Is this the latest one that Redhat recommends you update in order to build the kernel? I forget, something like GCC 2.96-79. I have a similar setup at home... I'll tr

Re: sata_sil 3112 activity LED patch

2005-07-14 Thread Aric Cyr
the 3112a (or 3512 as I believe they are register compatible) and isn't bound by an NDA, I'd like to hear from you. -- Aric Cyr (http://acyr.net) gpg fingerprint: 943A 1549 47AC D766 B7F8 D551 6703 7142 C282 D542 pgpfSBy3ao27E.pgp Description: PGP signature

sata_sil 3112 activity LED patch

2005-07-05 Thread Aric Cyr
sata_sil.c that just set the GPIO bits and calls ata_bmdma_*. As a sanity test, I ran my drive, loaded, overnight with no problems. If there is a better way to do this, I would be happy to hear any suggestions... it is kind of ugly as it is now. -- Aric Cyr (http://acyr.net) gpg fingerprint:

Re: sata_sil 3112 activity LED patch

2005-07-07 Thread Aric Cyr
n the light back off? I'm probably missing something, so is there a simpler way to do this? -- Aric Cyr (http://acyr.net) gpg fingerprint: 943A 1549 47AC D766 B7F8 D551 6703 7142 C282 D542 --- drivers/scsi/sata_sil.c.orig2005-07-07 10:07:19.0 +0900 +

Re: 2.6.13 (was 2.6.11.11) and rsync oops (SATA or NFS related?)

2005-09-06 Thread Aric Cyr
Kalin KOZHUHAROV thinrope.net> writes: > > A closer examination of the drive: > (Model=ST3300831AS, FwRev=3.03, SerialNo=3NF07KA1 ) > and why is it so slow revealed that it was running not in UDMA. > > Got one total oops, even no logs were written to disk. > Seems that rsync-ing huge amoun

Re: 2.6.13 (was 2.6.11.11) and rsync oops (SATA or NFS related?)

2005-09-07 Thread Aric Cyr
Kalin KOZHUHAROV thinrope.net> writes: > ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100 > ata2: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100 > scsi1 : sata_sil >Vendor: ATA Model: WDC WD360GD-00FL Rev: 21.0 >Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 >Vendor: ATA Model: ST33