Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system

2001-04-24 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > Eric S. Raymond writes: > > > This is a proposal for an attribution metadata system in the Linux > > kernel sources. The goal of the system is to make it easy for > > people reading any given piece of code to identify the responsible > > maintain

Re: soffice, 2.2.18, cpu 97% idle, loadavg 6.05

2001-01-03 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
What is the compiler? On Wed, 3 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > linux 2.2.18 with VM-global patch > 128MB RAM > AMD K6-3/366 > Star Office 5.2 > > I exiting StarOffice, and a little later noticed my loadavg display > widget was showing a high load average. top reports it at 6. > > Poking

Re: soffice, 2.2.18, cpu 97% idle, loadavg 6.05

2001-01-04 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
Can you reproduce the same error on GCC 2.72? Anuradha On Thu, 4 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:54:17PM +0600, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > > > > What is the compiler? > > % gcc -v > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-

Re: Announce: modutils 2.4.0 is available

2001-01-04 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > modutils-2.4.0.tar.gz Source tarball, includes RPM spec file > modutils-2.4.0-1.src.rpmAs above, in SRPM format > modutils-2.4.0-1.i386.rpm Compiled with egcs-2.91.66, glibc 2.1.2 > modutils-2.4.0-1.sparc.rpm Compiled for comb

Re: Announce: modutils 2.4.0 is available

2001-01-05 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:48:04PM +0600, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > > Why not DEB? > > Because Keith doesn't have a Debian system? He just provides the rpms > as a service, he doesn't have to do that. Of cource he doesn&#

Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ?

2001-01-09 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
How big is the kernel image? Are you making a zImage or bzImage? Anuradha On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Robert Kaiser wrote: > On Mit, 10 Jan 2001 you wrote: > > > > How much physical memory does this box really have? > > > > The one I'm currently using is an old Olivetti 386SX with 5 MB, I also tri

Re: recommended gcc compiler version

2000-12-22 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > For i386 > > 2.2.18 > gcc 2.7.2 or egcs-1.1.2 Just a remainder for debian users. There is a debian package gcc272 which is said to be the "GNU C compiler's C part", for "backword compatibility purposes". I recompiled my kernel after an apt-get in

Re: recommended gcc compiler version

2000-12-25 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On 24 Dec 2000, Kai Henningsen wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anuradha Ratnaweera) wrote on 22.12.00 in ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > For i386 > > > > > > 2.2.18 > > > gcc 2.7.2 or e

Re: 2.2.18 signal.h

2000-12-16 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 11:18:35AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > x() > > > { > > > > > > switch (1) { > > > case 0: > > > case 1: > > > case 2: > > > case 3: > > > ; > > > } >

Re: Linux-2.4.4 failure to compile

2001-05-18 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > I think the header file you're talking about is the db1 header file, > > which has nothing to do with yacc -- it's the Berkeley libdb version 1, > > which is a pretty bad thing to require. > > >

Re: parport problems with devfs

2001-05-22 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Nico Schottelius wrote: > I attached the problem occured with parport and devfs. I don't exactly > know where the problem in the parport source is. If someone has a > patch for it, I will test it. > > [...] > > # make our own device out of /dev > flapp:/ # mknod /lp0 c 6 0

Generating valid random .configs

2001-05-29 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
Recently, I posted a request here to send your .config files and I received a good number of them. (thanks!). Now I want to generate even more different configurations, and a random .config generator would be ideal. If I write a program which randomly outputs "y", "m" and "n" and pipe its output

Re: [PATCH] compiler warning fix in aci.c

2001-05-30 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Robert Siemer wrote: > From: Anuradha Ratnaweera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Wed, 30 May 2001, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > > > > > Following patch fixes a compiler warning in aci.c. > > > > I can guess the usefulln

[PATCH] compiler warning fix in aci.c

2001-05-29 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
Following patch fixes a compiler warning in aci.c. Regards, Anuradha -- http://www.bee.lk/people/anuradha/ diff -rua linux-2.4.5/drivers/sound/aci.c linux/drivers/sound/aci.c --- linux-2.4.5/drivers/sound/aci.c Tue May 29 23:42:11 2001 +++ linux/drivers/so

[PATCH] compiler warning fixes in 8139too.c

2001-05-29 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
The following patch fixes some warnings when 8139 driver is compiled without 8129 support. Regards, Anuradha -- http://www.bee.lk/people/anuradha/ diff -rua linux-2.4.5/drivers/net/8139too.c linux/drivers/net/8139too.c --- linux-2.4.5/drivers/net/8139too.c T

Re: [OT] Re: Snowhite and the Seven Dwarfs - The REAL story!

2001-06-16 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On 15 Jun 2001, Michael Peddemors wrote: > (Personally, I block em at the mailer, to protect those poor > unfortunates that haven't switched to Linux Yet) Personally, I don't. If I do so, those poor unfortunates will have one less reason to switch to Linux and will remain unfortunates forever ;

Unresolved symbol do_softirq in 2.4.6-pre3

2001-06-18 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
Hi all, I started running 2.4.6-pre3 using the same configuration file as 2.4.5. Diff shows no effective differences between two config files. depmod complains unresolved symbols (do_softirq) in ppp_generic, ppp_async and sunrpc. do_softirq is listed in System.map-2.4.6-pre3. I started with a

Re: Unresolved symbol do_softirq in 2.4.6-pre3

2001-06-18 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:15:07PM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: > > Try this ... > It works. Thanks. I wonder how I missed the previous post of this patch. Anuradha Penguin : Linux 2.4.6-pre3 on an i586 (Compaq Presario 1615

Re: Reg:use of file_system_type structure

2001-06-22 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 01:51:39PM +0530, SATHISH.J wrote: > > Every file system has file_system_type structure defined. Where else this > structure is referred. Does register_filesystem() refer this structure. Does > sys_mount refer to this structure by any means? For this and all your other qu

Re: 2.4.5 and gcc v3 final

2001-06-23 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:29:25AM +0400, Anatoly Ivanov wrote: > > I hope that lk-developers would fix it one day. Multi-string literals is a nice little ANSI C feature that appears everywhere. Why it is necessary to "fix" them? Anuradha -- Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.6-pre5) For some rea

Re: How to compile on one machine and install on another?

2001-06-23 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 06:50:33PM -0300, John R Lenton wrote: > > make-kpkg takes care of all that for you (it's part of kernel-package) It does. But only for Debian users like you and me. Regards, Anuradha -- Penguin : Linux 2.4.6-pre5 on an i586 "Language shapes the way we think, and de

Re: [RFC] Early flush (was: spindown)

2001-06-23 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 04:58:51PM -0400, Tom Sightler wrote: > > 1. When running a compile, or anything else that produces lots of small disk > writes, you tend to get lots of little pauses for all the little writes to disk. > These seem to be unnoticable without the patch. > > 2. Loading p

Re: 2.4.5 and gcc v3 final

2001-06-26 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 01:33:51PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote: > Fabian Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > What gcc objects to is stuff like: > >"This is a nice long string > that just goes on > and on\n" > > which is illegal in C AFAIU. It does not object to: > >"This long

Re: 2.4.5 and gcc v3 final

2001-06-26 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:41:49AM +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote: > > But the first example contains three newlines, the second just one. A > thing to keep in mind when going around fixing these multi line strings, > explicit newlines have to be added. Some code contains very long lines (around 15

[PATCH] GCC v3 warning fixes #2

2001-06-26 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
This patch fixes compiler warnings on a couple of __asm__ calls. Please let me know if they effect the readability of the code (they _do_). Regards, Anuradha -- Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.6-pre5) If I were to walk on water, the press would say I'm only doing it because I can't swim.

[PATCH] GCC v3 warning fixes #1 (Was: Re: 2.4.5 and gcc v3 final)

2001-06-26 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 01:33:51PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote: > > What gcc objects to is stuff like: > >"This is a nice long string > that just goes on > and on\n" > > which is illegal in C AFAIU. It does not object to: > >"This long string" >"spans several lines, " >

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-07-05 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:26:53PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Leave the copyright messages alone is all I can say. And as to your flag, > well we've got one. Try the 'quiet' boot option Leaving copyright messages also saves the purpose of motivating - not all but many - developers. People who _s

Re: traceroute breaks with 2.4.4

2001-05-01 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
Isn't it "kernel-user netlink socket"? Anuradha On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, David Konerding wrote: > David Konerding wrote: > > > As far as I can tell, somewhere between 2.4.2 and 2.4.4, traceroute > > stopped working. > > I see the problem on RH7.x. Regular kernel compile with near-defaults > > fo

Please send your .config

2001-05-03 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
I need to do some extensive tests in compiling the Linux 2.4.x kernel under different configurations. For that, can you please send your kernel configuration file to me (if you don't mind, of course!). Obviously, do not send CCs to the list. Please do not change the subject line, (I don't mind

Re: linux + Compaq Presario Laptop

2001-05-10 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Bohdan Vlasyuk wrote: > Hi !! I'm running linux on Compaq Presario 1215 Laptop. Kernel is, > as shipped with RH 7.0, 2.2.16. I am running 2.4.4 on a Presario 1615 (debian 2.2 with updates) without problems. I had to turn on allow interrupts in APM settings, in order to get

Re: Possible README patch

2001-05-10 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Russell King wrote: > gzip -dc linux-2.4.XX.tar.gz | tar zvf - > gzip -dc patchXX.gz | patch -p0 This does _not_ work for international kernel patch. They assume the directories lin.2.x.x/ (old) and int.2.x.x/ (new) and not linux/. Therefore it _is_ necessary to `cd linux' a

Re: page_launder() bug

2001-05-10 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Mon, 7 May 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote: > > On 05.07 Helge Hafting wrote: > > > > !0 is 1. !(anything else) is 0. It is zero and one, not > > zero and "non-zero". So a !! construction gives zero if you have > > zero, and one if you had anything else. There's no doubt about it. > > > >

Re: Crash

2001-05-13 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > Is it possible to screw up the hardware entirely from software? I made > > In an abstract theoretical sense yes. Accidentally almost impossible. There _were_ some viruses (in M$ world) that added "expensive" operations to every disk access, such as readi

Re: Not a typewriter

2001-05-15 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Thu, 10 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I disagree. "Not a typewriter" is part of Unix tradition, and ought > to be retained as a historical reference. It's also an opportunity > for "the uninitiated" to learn a little more and move a little closer > to becoming "the initiated." We sho

Re: 2.4.2 - Locked keyboard

2001-05-15 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Jorge Boncompte [DTI2] wrote: > After the reboot, the keyboard was working 5 minutes and then it > locked. The console was working. I rebooted the machine again and has > been working for 2 days, that the keyboard gets locked again. Just to make sure... Did you check scoll