hwd accel framebuffer: Newbi question (sleep in sync)

Regards Andrey Volkov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Where is place of arch independed companion chips?

Hi Tony, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > Andrey Volkov wrote: > >> Hi Greg, >> >> While I write driver for SM501 CC (which have graphics controller, USB >> MASTER/SLAVE, AC97, UART, SPI and VIDEO CAPTURE onboard), >> I bumped with next ambiguity: >> Where

Re: Where is place of arch independed companion chips?

Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 08:29:35AM -0400, Jamey Hicks wrote: > >>Andrey Volkov wrote: >> >> >>>Hi Greg, >>> >>>While I write driver for SM501 CC (which have graphics controller, USB >>>MASTER/SLAVE, AC97, UART, SPI

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: Where is place of arch independed companion chips?

ic parts that were separable would live > in the appropriate place within the kernel. > > Just another idea to add to the mix and removes the dilemma of a > multifunction device with isn't platform based... > drivers/mfd as drivers/mfd, I have not objections. Who will send the pa

RFC: CANbus subsytem for 2.6 kernel (char or netdev)

nt to use netdev? -- Regards Andrey Volkov. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: RFC: CANbus subsytem for 2.6 kernel (char or netdev)

Hi Benedikt, Yes, thanks, very close to what about I thinking :), but are you measure overhead of netdev (it disturb me)? Andrey Benedikt Spranger wrote: Anyone could told me, why everyone, who wrote CANbus driver (peak, kvaser etc) always use char dev, but not netdev for it? May be exist some gl