nfs_fsinfo->bsize size (2.4.2)

Hello! Some time ago I had an undefined symbol in kernel compilation (__mul64) It was sparc architecture, cross compilation on solaris/sparc. I have found that 64-bit multiplication is in nfs2xdr.c, nfs_xdr_statfsres function. The multiplication is by nfs_fsinfo->bsize. For some reason nfs_fsinf

Re: Trying to fix 3dfx.o + question about char drivers..

Michael Bacarella wrote: > So, I upgrade to 2.4.0 and it's cool, except that I can't do > anything neat with my voodoo3 anymore. I've been looking > for a solution for weeks but to no avail. 3dfx's web site > looks like it's gone and nothing on lk about it. > > The process calls ioctl() after ope

Re: O_NONBLOCK, read(), select(), NFS, Ext2, etc.

On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 09:40:55AM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > be true; but perhaps I am doing something wrong. If I open() a file (on > > 2.2.18) from a floppy or NFS mount (to test in a slow environment) with > > O_NONBLOCK|O_RDONLY, read() will still block. If I try to select() on > > the file d

sound problems caused by masking irq for too long

Hi! In some cases sound gets interrupted for a moment, this happens in two occasions. When unmaskirq flag is off on ide cdrom and it is accessed, and when tdfxfb console (800x600) flashes (tput flash, or `set bell-style visible' in .inputrc). It seems the problem is caused by masking irq for too

[2.6.10] cdc-acm.c patches

Hello! I have ZyXEL UNO modem which has usb acm interface. Starting with kernel version 2.6.8 the driver cdc-acm began to hand when the modem connection was dropped due to being idle. After the hang, no data could be read from the device /dev/usb/ttyACM0, but writting was ok. The led "data" was li

Problem with 2.6.18: memory leak(?)

After a while, a loaded http proxy gets many errors like below. It is reproducible and happens again after reboot (in some time). It did not happen with 2.6.17. I have also tested 2.6.18.3, the leak is there too. swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x20 [] __alloc_pages+0x253/0x267 [

Re: Problem with 2.6.18: memory leak(?)

On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 07:38:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > It's not necessarily a leak. Networking tried to allocate two You are right, it is not a leak. Probably the memory usage increased for some other reason. > physically-contiguous pages from atomic context, but no such two pages were