Re: nfsd oops on Linus' current tree.

2013-01-03 Thread Adamson, Dros
Hey, sorry for the late response, I've been on vacation. On Dec 21, 2012, at 6:45 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:36:51PM +, Myklebust, Trond wrote: >> Please reread what I said. There was no obvious circular dependency, >> because nfsiod and rpciod are separate workq

Re: nfsd oops on Linus' current tree.

2013-01-03 Thread Adamson, Dros
On Jan 3, 2013, at 3:11 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 04:28:37PM +0000, Adamson, Dros wrote: >> Hey, sorry for the late response, I've been on vacation. >> >> On Dec 21, 2012, at 6:45 PM, J. Bruce Fields >> wrote: >> >&g

Re: nfsd oops on Linus' current tree.

2013-01-04 Thread Adamson, Dros
On Jan 3, 2013, at 6:26 PM, "Myklebust, Trond" wrote: > On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 18:11 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 17:26 -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: >>> Ooh, BTW, there was a bug where workqueue code created a false >>> dependency between two work items. Workqueue currently