Re: IBM HDAPS things are looking up (was: Re: [Hdaps-devel] Re: [ltp] IBM HDAPS Someone interested? (Accelerometer))

On 7/4/05, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Generel observation on this driver - why isn't it just contained in user > space? You need to do the monitoring and sending of ide commands from > there anyways, I don't see the point of putting it in the kernel. > Can't the accelerometer be used

Re: 2.6.11-rc1-mm1

Hi, I'm very much a newbie to all of this, but I'm finding this discussion fairly interesting. I've got a quick question and I just want to be clear that it doesn't have a political agenda behind it. Here goes, why can't LTT and/or relayfs, work similar to the way syslog does and just fill

CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE question

CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE currently makes it impossible both to chattr +i or chattr -i. I think it would be convenient if there was someone to make it only illegal for chattr -i. So that I could still make files unchangeable, while not allowing myself to ever make them changeable again without the cap

[PATCH 1/1] Change version references in README from 3.x to 4.x

Fixed the references to kernel version 3.x to kernel version 4.x in the README file Signed-off-by: Aaron Cohen --- README | 34 +- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index a24ec89..67fc7a8 100644 --- a/README +++ b