It's time to remove DAMON debugfs interface, which has deprecated long
before in February 2023. Read the cover letter of this patch series for
more details.
Remove kernel configs for running DAMON debugfs interface kunit tests
from the kunit all_tests configuration, to prevent unnecessary noises
It's time to remove DAMON debugfs interface, which has deprecated long
before in February 2023. Read the cover letter of this patch series for
more details.
Remove selftests for the interface, to prevent causing unnecessary test
failures.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park
---
tools/testing/selftest
It's time to remove DAMON debugfs interface, which has deprecated long
before in February 2023. Read the cover letter of this patch series for
more details.
Remove kunit tests for the interface, to prevent unnecessary test
failures.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park
---
mm/damon/Kconfig
It's time to remove DAMON debugfs interface, which has deprecated long
before in February 2023. Read the cover letter of this patch series for
more details.
Remove configs for selftests of it from DAMON selftests config file, to
prevent unnecessary noises from the tests.
[1] https://lore.kernel.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 8:45 PM Cindy Lu wrote:
>
> The vhost now uses vhost_task and workers as a child of the owner
> thread. While this aligns with containerization principles, it confuses
> some legacy userspace applications. Therefore, we are reintroducing
> support for the kthread API.
>
> I
Hello,
When using our customed fuzzer tool to fuzz the latest Linux kernel, the
following crash
was triggered.
HEAD commit: dbfac60febfa806abb2d384cb6441e77335d2799
git tree: upstream
Console output:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D3EDxDxPi0t7m_Z4Uc4FuL26DnHs7yTa/view?usp=sharing
Kernel confi
Looks good to me. Did boot test and reading the /sys files works.
Linux-ci tests [0] are also good (the failing tests are broken from
some time, ignoring them):
[0]:
https://github.com/adi-g15-ibm/linux-ci/actions?query=branch%3Atmp-test-branch-10962+branch%3Atmp-test-branch-26310+branch%3Atmp-t
Hi,
Please use this Tested-by instead of the previous one i sent:
Tested-by: Aditya Gupta
Thanks,
- Aditya G
On 02/01/25 11:07, Aditya Gupta wrote:
Looks good to me. Did boot test and reading the /sys files works.
Linux-ci tests [0] are also good (the failing tests are broken from
some ti
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 07:31:27PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 07:18:08 + Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 06:27:34AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 07:11:25 + Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > > > The first patch fixes the xfrm offload fe
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 8:45 PM Cindy Lu wrote:
>
> Add the previously removed function vhost_worker() back to support the
> kthread and rename it to vhost_run_work_kthread_list.
>
> The old function vhost_worker() was changed to support tasks in
> commit 6e890c5d5021 ("vhost: use vhost_tasks for
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 8:45 PM Cindy Lu wrote:
>
> Reintroduce the previously removed functions vhost_attach_cgroups_work()
> and vhost_attach_cgroups() to support kthread mode. Rename
> vhost_attach_cgroups() to vhost_attach_task_to_cgroups(), and include
> the implementation of the old function
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 8:45 PM Cindy Lu wrote:
>
> Restore the previously removed functions kthread_wakeup and
> kthread_stop, and add two new function pointers to wake up and stop
> the workers. The function vhost_worker_create will initialize these
> pointers based on the value of inherit_owner
On 1/2/2025 10:44 AM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 07:31:27PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 07:18:08 + Hangbin Liu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 06:27:34AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 07:11:25 + Hangbin Liu wrote:
The first pat
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 8:45 PM Cindy Lu wrote:
>
> Add a new UAPI to enable setting the vhost device to task mode.
> The userspace application can use VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER
> to configure the mode if necessary.
> This setting must be applied before VHOST_SET_OWNER, as the worker
> will be
Handle the case that hugetlbfs is not supported. To make it easier
for debugging.
On a system that does not support hugetlbfs. There will be no such
HugePages_Free entry in /proc/meminfo. And consequently freepgs will
be empty. The huge pages availability check will fail and the test
will be start
Handle the case that hugetlbfs is not supported. To make it easier
for debugging.
On a system that does not support hugetlbfs. There will be no such
HugePages_Free entry in /proc/meminfo. And consequently freepgs will
be empty. The huge pages availability check will fail and the test
will be start
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 08:33:57PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
>
>
> On 31 December 2024 20:18:12 CET, Manivannan Sadhasivam
> wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 06:42:42PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 06:43:41PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> >>
> >> (...)
>
On 12/23/24 21:14, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 at 02:55, Petr Pavlu wrote:
>>
>> Luis asked me to look after the modules maintenance for a while, with the
>> plan to rotate it with other recently added modules maintainers/reviewers.
>> This is my first pull request to you.
>
> I *
18 matches
Mail list logo
