This bug is marked as fixed by commit:
KVM: x86: Remove WARN sanity check on hypervisor timer vs. UNINITIALIZED vCPU
But I can't find it in the tested trees[1] for more than 90 days.
Is it a correct commit? Please update it by replying:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
Until then the bug is still co
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:16:42 +0800, Huang, Kai wrote:
> >
>
> That's true. I was thinking no need to have them done in separate
calls.
> The caller has to check the return value for epc_cg instance first,
then
> check result of try_charge. But there is really only one caller,
> sgx_alloc_e
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:45:46 +0800, Huang, Kai wrote:
On Mon, 2023-10-30 at 11:20 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
From: Sean Christopherson
To prepare for per-cgroup reclamation, separate the top-level reclaim
function, sgx_reclaim_epc_pages(), into two separate functions:
- sgx_isolate_epc_page
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 00:01:56 +0800, Haitao Huang
wrote:
> > > > Then here we can have something like:
> > > >
> > > > void sgx_reclaim_pages(struct sgx_epc_cg *epc_cg)
> > > > {
> > > > struct sgx_epc_lru_list *lru = epc_cg ?
&epc_cg->lru :
> > > > &sgx_glo
Consider an object near to the sensor when their distance is about 4 cm
or below.
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio
Signed-off-by: André Apitzsch
---
Changes in v2:
- add R-b
- Link to v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231016-bqm5_prox-v1-1-2acdc732b...@apitzsch.eu
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8939-
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 04:11:35PM +, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:36:23AM -0300, Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 10:01:25PM -0300, Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> > > Hello RT-list!
> > >
> > > I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.201-rt98
6 matches
Mail list logo
