4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Lars Ellenberg
commit 64dafbc9530c10300acffc57fae3269d95fa8f93 upstream.
We have
struct drbd_requests { ... struct bio *private_bio; ... }
to hold a bio clone for local submission.
On local
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit bc890a60247171294acc0bd67d211fa4b88d40ba upstream.
If there is a corupted file system where the claimed depth of the
extent tree is -1, this can cause a massive buffer over
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit bdbd6ce01a70f02e9373a584d0ae9538dcf0a121 upstream.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: sta...@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
---
fs/ext4/inode.c |4 ++--
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Laura Abbott
commit 0a2bc00341dcfcc793c0dbf4f8d43adf60458b05 upstream.
The expected return value from ion_map_kernel is an ERR_PTR. The error
path for a vmalloc failure currently just returns N
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.140 release.
There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jul 12 18:23:24 UTC 2018.
Anything receiv
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tetsuo Handa
commit ebec3f8f5271139df618ebdf8427e24ba102ba94 upstream.
syzbot is reporting stalls at __process_echoes() [1]. This is because
since ldata->echo_commit < ldata->echo_tail becomes
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tetsuo Handa
commit 3d63b7e4ae0dc5e02d28ddd2fa1f945defc68d81 upstream.
syzbot is reporting stalls at n_tty_receive_char_special() [1]. This is
because comparison is not working as expected sinc
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Karoly Pados
commit 2f839823382748664b643daa73f41ee0cc01ced6 upstream.
Silicon Labs defines alternative VID/PID pairs for some chips that when
used will automatically install drivers for Window
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit c37e9e013469521d9adb932d17a1795c139b36db upstream.
If there is a directory entry pointing to a system inode (such as a
journal inode), complain and declare the file system
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:20:50AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:21:47 -0700
> Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
> > b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index ..dc01c7f4d326
> > --- /dev/null
>
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Dave Hansen
commit 02afeaae9843733a39cd9b11053748b2d1dc5ae7 upstream.
The x86 early command line parsing in cmdline_find_option_bool() is
buggy. If it matches a specified 'option' all the way t
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mikulas Patocka
commit 41c73a49df31151f4ff868f28fe4f129f113fa2c upstream.
If the first allocation attempt using GFP_NOWAIT fails, drop the lock
and retry using GFP_NOIO allocation (lock is drop
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Douglas Anderson
commit 9ea61cac0b1ad0c09022f39fd97e9b99a2cfc2dc upstream.
We've seen in-field reports showing _lots_ (18 in one case, 41 in
another) of tasks all sitting there blocked on:
m
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Vlastimil Babka
commit 7810e6781e0fcbca78b91cf65053f895bf59e85f upstream.
In __alloc_pages_slowpath() we reset zonelist and preferred_zoneref for
allocations that can ignore memory policies. T
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Martin Kaiser
commit 3f77f244d8ec28e3a0a81240ffac7d626390060c upstream.
The v21 version of the NAND flash controller contains a Spare Area Size
Register (SPAS) at offset 0x10. Its setting defau
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Wolfram Sang
commit ae481cc139658e89eb3ea671dd00b67bd87f01a3 upstream.
Resume failed because of uninitialized registers. Instead of adding a
resume callback, we simply initialize registers befo
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 03:19:44PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> The new rseq call arrived in 4.18-rc1, so provide it in the asm-generic
> unistd.h for architectures such as arm64.
>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon
> ---
> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 4 +++-
> 1
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
commit 2f38c3c01de945234d23dd163e3528ccb413066d upstream.
Chipset from QCA99X0 onwards (QCA99X0, QCA9984, QCA4019 & future)
rx_hdr_status is not padded to align in 4-b
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Paulo Alcantara
commit 7ffbe65578b44fafdef577a360eb0583929f7c6e upstream.
For every request we send, whether it is SMB1 or SMB2+, we attempt to
reconnect tcon (cifs_reconnect_tcon or smb2_recon
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit 6e8ab72a812396996035a37e5ca4b3b99b5d214b upstream.
When converting from an inode from storing the data in-line to a data
block, ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock() was only c
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jann Horn
commit ce00bf07cc95a57cd20b208e02b3c2604e532ae8 upstream.
The old code would indefinitely block other users of nf_log_mutex if
a userspace access in proc_dostring() blocked e.g. due t
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jason Andryuk
commit ef6eaf27274c0351f7059163918f3795da13199c upstream.
Commit ac75a041048b ("HID: i2c-hid: fix size check and type usage") started
writing messages when the ret_size is <= 2 fr
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brad Love
commit 3ee9bc12342cf546313d300808ff47d7dbb8e7db upstream.
The cx25840 driver currently configures 885, 887, and 888 using
default divisors for each chip. This check to see if the cx23
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jon Derrick
commit a17712c8e4be4fa5404d20e9cd3b2b21eae7bc56 upstream.
This patch attempts to close a hole leading to a BUG seen with hot
removals during writes [1].
A block device (NVME namesp
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Masami Hiramatsu
commit 804dec5bda9b4fcdab5f67fe61db4a0498af5221 upstream.
Do not modify singlestep execution buffer (kprobe.ainsn.insn)
while resuming from single-stepping, instead, modifies
t
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
commit 4f65245f2d178b9cba48350620d76faa4a098841 upstream.
uref->field_index, uref->usage_index, finfo.field_index and cinfo.index can be
indirectly controlled by user-space,
On 7/10/18 9:21 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On 32-bit architectures, dividing a 64-bit number needs to use the
> do_div() function or something like it to avoid a link failure:
>
> block/blk-iolatency.o: In function `iolatency_prfill_limit':
> blk-iolatency.c:(.text+0x8cc): undefined reference to `
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings
The validation code modified by commit 5b5e7a0de2bb ("net: metrics:
add proper netlink validation") is organised differently in older
kernel versions. The fib_convert_metrics() fu
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tokunori Ikegami
commit 85a82e28b023de9b259a86824afbd6ba07bd6475 upstream.
The definition can be used for other program and erase operations also.
So change the naming to MAX_RETRIES from MAX_W
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tokunori Ikegami
commit 79ca484b613041ca223f74b34608bb6f5221724b upstream.
Currently the functions use to check both chip ready and good.
But the chip ready is not enough to check the operation
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tokunori Ikegami
commit 45f75b8a919a4255f52df454f1ffdee0e42443b2 upstream.
For the word write functions it is retried for error.
But it is not implemented to retry for the erase functions.
To m
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit bfe0a5f47ada40d7984de67e59a7d3390b9b9ecc upstream.
The kernel's ext4 mount-time checks were more permissive than
e2fsprogs's libext2fs checks when opening a file system. T
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Houston Yaroschoff
commit 4a762569a2722b8a48066c7bacf0e1dc67d17fa1 upstream.
Uniden UBC125 radio scanner has USB interface which fails to work
with cdc_acm driver:
usb 1-1.5: new full-speed U
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Taehee Yoo
commit adc972c5b88829d38ede08b1069718661c7330ae upstream.
When depth of chain is bigger than NFT_JUMP_STACK_SIZE, the nft_do_chain
crashes. But there is no need to crash hard here.
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mike Marciniszyn
commit 1bc0299d976e000ececc6acd76e33b4582646cb7 upstream.
The following code fails to allocate a buffer for the
tail address that the hardware DMAs into when the user
context D
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sean Nyekjaer
commit df07101e1c4a29e820df02f9989a066988b160e6 upstream.
According to the reference manual the shp_2_mcu / mcu_2_shp
scripts must be used for devices connected through the SPBA.
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tony Luck
commit 40c36e2741d7fe1e66d6ec55477ba5fd19c9c5d2 upstream.
Some injection testing resulted in the following console log:
mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 22: Machine Check Exception: f Ba
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yazen Ghannam
commit fead35c68926682c90c995f22b48f1c8d78865c1 upstream.
Check the MCG_STATUS_LMCES bit on Intel to verify that current MCE is
local. It is always local on AMD.
Signed-off-by: Y
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Grygorii Strashko
commit bfe72442578bb112626e476ffe1f276504d85b95 upstream.
Now the command:
ethtool --phy-statistics eth0
will cause system crash with meassage "Unable to handle kernel
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: David S. Miller
commit f4eb17e1efe538d4da7d574bedb00a8dafcc26b7 upstream.
This reverts commit b699d0035836f6712917a41e7ae58d84359b8ff9.
As per Eric Dumazet, the pskb_may_pull() is a NOP in thi
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jann Horn
commit 26b5b874aff5659a7e26e5b1997e3df2c41fa7fd upstream.
As Al Viro noted in commit 128394eff343 ("sg_write()/bsg_write() is not fit
to be called under KERNEL_DS"), sg improperly acc
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Juergen Gross
commit 74899d92e3dc7671a8017b3146dcd4735f3b upstream.
Commit:
1f50ddb4f418 ("x86/speculation: Handle HT correctly on AMD")
... added speculative_store_bypass_ht_init() to
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andy Lutomirski
commit 60d3450167433f2d099ce2869dc52dd9e7dc9b29 upstream.
Calling get_cpu_cap() will reset a bunch of CPU features. This will
cause the system to lose track of force-set and fo
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Changbin Du
commit 1fe4293f4b8de75824935f8d8e9a99c7fc6873da upstream.
The function_graph tracer does not show the interrupt return marker for the
leaf entry. On leaf entries, we see an unbalanc
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Johan Hovold
commit 24160628a34af962ac99f2f58e547ac3c4cbd26f upstream.
Add device ids for CESINEL products.
Reported-by: Carlos Barcala Lara
Cc: stable
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold
Signed-of
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christian Borntraeger
commit 891f6a726cacbb87e5b06076693ffab53bd378d7 upstream.
In the critical section cleanup we must not mess with r1. For march=z9
or older, larl + ex (instead of exrl) are
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Lars Ellenberg
commit 64dafbc9530c10300acffc57fae3269d95fa8f93 upstream.
We have
struct drbd_requests { ... struct bio *private_bio; ... }
to hold a bio clone for local submission.
On local
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Cannon Matthews
commit 520495fe96d74e05db585fc748351e0504d8f40d upstream.
When booting with very large numbers of gigantic (i.e. 1G) pages, the
operations in the loop of gather_bootmem_preallo
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit e09463f220ca9a1a1ecfda84fcda658f99a1f12a upstream.
Do not set the b_modified flag in block's journal head should not
until after we're sure that jbd2_journal_dirty_metadat(
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mikulas Patocka
commit 99ec9e77511dea55d81729fc80b6c63a61bfa8e0 upstream.
The displaylink hardware has such a peculiarity that it doesn't render a
command until next command is received. This p
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit 8844618d8aa7a9973e7b527d038a2a589665002c upstream.
The bg_flags field in the block group descripts is only valid if the
uninit_bg or metadata_csum feature is enabled. We w
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Paulo Alcantara
commit 7ffbe65578b44fafdef577a360eb0583929f7c6e upstream.
For every request we send, whether it is SMB1 or SMB2+, we attempt to
reconnect tcon (cifs_reconnect_tcon or smb2_recon
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit 77260807d1170a8cf35dbb06e07461a655f67eee upstream.
It's really bad when the allocation bitmaps and the inode table
overlap with the block group descriptors, since it causes
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit bdbd6ce01a70f02e9373a584d0ae9538dcf0a121 upstream.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o
Cc: sta...@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
---
fs/ext4/inode.c |4 ++--
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Karoly Pados
commit 2f839823382748664b643daa73f41ee0cc01ced6 upstream.
Silicon Labs defines alternative VID/PID pairs for some chips that when
used will automatically install drivers for Window
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit bc890a60247171294acc0bd67d211fa4b88d40ba upstream.
If there is a corupted file system where the claimed depth of the
extent tree is -1, this can cause a massive buffer over
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: William Wu
commit 8760675932ddb614e83702117d36ea644050c609 upstream.
The dwc2_get_ls_map() use ttport to reference into the
bitmap if we're on a multi_tt hub. But the bitmaps index
from 0 to (h
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit 819b23f1c501b17b9694325471789e6b5cc2d0d2 upstream.
Regardless of whether the flex_bg feature is set, we should always
check to make sure the bits we are setting in the bloc
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tetsuo Handa
commit 3d63b7e4ae0dc5e02d28ddd2fa1f945defc68d81 upstream.
syzbot is reporting stalls at n_tty_receive_char_special() [1]. This is
because comparison is not working as expected sinc
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tetsuo Handa
commit ebec3f8f5271139df618ebdf8427e24ba102ba94 upstream.
syzbot is reporting stalls at __process_echoes() [1]. This is because
since ldata->echo_commit < ldata->echo_tail becomes
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Laura Abbott
commit 0a2bc00341dcfcc793c0dbf4f8d43adf60458b05 upstream.
The expected return value from ion_map_kernel is an ERR_PTR. The error
path for a vmalloc failure currently just returns N
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit c37e9e013469521d9adb932d17a1795c139b36db upstream.
If there is a directory entry pointing to a system inode (such as a
journal inode), complain and declare the file system
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mikulas Patocka
commit d12067f428c037b4575aaeb2be00847fc214c24a upstream.
dm_bufio_shrink_count() is called from do_shrink_slab to find out how many
freeable objects are there. The reported val
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tokunori Ikegami
commit 45f75b8a919a4255f52df454f1ffdee0e42443b2 upstream.
For the word write functions it is retried for error.
But it is not implemented to retry for the erase functions.
To m
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.112 release.
There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jul 12 18:24:30 UTC 2018.
Anything receiv
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit bfe0a5f47ada40d7984de67e59a7d3390b9b9ecc upstream.
The kernel's ext4 mount-time checks were more permissive than
e2fsprogs's libext2fs checks when opening a file system. T
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Wolfram Sang
commit ae481cc139658e89eb3ea671dd00b67bd87f01a3 upstream.
Resume failed because of uninitialized registers. Instead of adding a
resume callback, we simply initialize registers befo
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Vlastimil Babka
commit 7810e6781e0fcbca78b91cf65053f895bf59e85f upstream.
In __alloc_pages_slowpath() we reset zonelist and preferred_zoneref for
allocations that can ignore memory policies. T
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Dan Carpenter
commit 1376b0a2160319125c3a2822e8c09bd283cd8141 upstream.
There is a '>' vs '<' typo so this loop is a no-op.
Fixes: d35dcc89fc93 ("staging: comedi: quatech_daqp_cs: fix
daqp_ao
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jon Derrick
commit a17712c8e4be4fa5404d20e9cd3b2b21eae7bc56 upstream.
This patch attempts to close a hole leading to a BUG seen with hot
removals during writes [1].
A block device (NVME namesp
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Martin Kaiser
commit 3f77f244d8ec28e3a0a81240ffac7d626390060c upstream.
The v21 version of the NAND flash controller contains a Spare Area Size
Register (SPAS) at offset 0x10. Its setting defau
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Douglas Anderson
commit 9ea61cac0b1ad0c09022f39fd97e9b99a2cfc2dc upstream.
We've seen in-field reports showing _lots_ (18 in one case, 41 in
another) of tasks all sitting there blocked on:
m
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mikulas Patocka
commit 41c73a49df31151f4ff868f28fe4f129f113fa2c upstream.
If the first allocation attempt using GFP_NOWAIT fails, drop the lock
and retry using GFP_NOIO allocation (lock is drop
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tokunori Ikegami
commit 85a82e28b023de9b259a86824afbd6ba07bd6475 upstream.
The definition can be used for other program and erase operations also.
So change the naming to MAX_RETRIES from MAX_W
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jann Horn
commit ce00bf07cc95a57cd20b208e02b3c2604e532ae8 upstream.
The old code would indefinitely block other users of nf_log_mutex if
a userspace access in proc_dostring() blocked e.g. due t
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tokunori Ikegami
commit 79ca484b613041ca223f74b34608bb6f5221724b upstream.
Currently the functions use to check both chip ready and good.
But the chip ready is not enough to check the operation
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brad Love
commit 3ee9bc12342cf546313d300808ff47d7dbb8e7db upstream.
The cx25840 driver currently configures 885, 887, and 888 using
default divisors for each chip. This check to see if the cx23
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
--
From: Alexander Potapenko
commit 21eff690e766ca0ce445b477698dc6a9f55a upstream.
KMSAN reported an infoleak when reading from /dev/vcs*:
BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in vcs_read+0x1
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.55 release.
There are 53 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jul 12 18:24:36 UTC 2018.
Anything receiv
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Rasmus Villemoes
commit 9564a8cf422d7b58f6e857e3546d346fa970191e upstream.
I tried building using a freshly built Make (4.2.1-69-g8a731d1), but
already the objtool build broke with
orc_dump.c:
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mikulas Patocka
commit 99ec9e77511dea55d81729fc80b6c63a61bfa8e0 upstream.
The displaylink hardware has such a peculiarity that it doesn't render a
command until next command is received. This
It was found that a constant stream of readers might cause the count to
go negative most of the time after an initial trigger by a writer even
if no writer was present afterward. As a result, most of the readers
would have to go through the slowpath reducing their performance.
To avoid that from h
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Daniel Rosenberg
commit 717adfdaf14704fd3ec7fa2c04520c0723247eac upstream.
If our length is greater than the size of the buffer, we
overflow the buffer
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit 6e8ab72a812396996035a37e5ca4b3b99b5d214b upstream.
When converting from an inode from storing the data in-line to a data
block, ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock() was only c
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Waldemar Rymarkiewicz
commit c5c2a97b3ac7d1ec19e7cff9e38caca6afefc3de upstream.
This commit fixes a rare but possible case when the clk rate is updated
without update of the regulator voltage.
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ido Schimmel
Jiri Slaby noticed that the backport of upstream commit 25cc72a33835
("mlxsw: spectrum: Forbid linking to devices that have uppers") to
kernel 4.9.y introduced the same check twice
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit 513f86d73855ce556ea9522b6bfd79f87356dc3a upstream.
If there an inode points to a block which is also some other type of
metadata block (such as a block allocation bitmap),
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
commit 4f65245f2d178b9cba48350620d76faa4a098841 upstream.
uref->field_index, uref->usage_index, finfo.field_index and cinfo.index can be
indirectly controlled by user-space,
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jason Andryuk
commit ef6eaf27274c0351f7059163918f3795da13199c upstream.
Commit ac75a041048b ("HID: i2c-hid: fix size check and type usage") started
writing messages when the ret_size is <= 2 fr
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit 5369a762c882c0b6e9599e4ebbb3a9ba9eee7e2d upstream.
In theory this should have been caught earlier when the xattr list was
verified, but in case it got missed, it's simple
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit 819b23f1c501b17b9694325471789e6b5cc2d0d2 upstream.
Regardless of whether the flex_bg feature is set, we should always
check to make sure the bits we are setting in the blo
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit 8844618d8aa7a9973e7b527d038a2a589665002c upstream.
The bg_flags field in the block group descripts is only valid if the
uninit_bg or metadata_csum feature is enabled. We
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Stefano Brivio
commit f46ecbd97f508e68a7806291a139499794874f3d upstream.
A "small" CIFS buffer is not big enough in general to hold a
setacl request for SMB2, and we end up overflowing the buf
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit 77260807d1170a8cf35dbb06e07461a655f67eee upstream.
It's really bad when the allocation bitmaps and the inode table
overlap with the block group descriptors, since it cause
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Michel Dänzer
commit 718b5406cd76f1aa6434311241b7febf0e8571ff upstream.
The property size may be controlled by userspace, can be large (I've
seen failure with order 4, i.e. 16 pages / 64 KB) a
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit bc890a60247171294acc0bd67d211fa4b88d40ba upstream.
If there is a corupted file system where the claimed depth of the
extent tree is -1, this can cause a massive buffer ove
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Changbin Du
commit 1fe4293f4b8de75824935f8d8e9a99c7fc6873da upstream.
The function_graph tracer does not show the interrupt return marker for the
leaf entry. On leaf entries, we see an unbalan
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit 8bc1379b82b8e809eef77a9fedbb75c6c297be19 upstream.
Use a separate journal transaction if it turns out that we need to
convert an inline file to use an data block. Otherwi
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit 8cdb5240ec5928b20490a2bb34cb87e9a5f40226 upstream.
When expanding the extra isize space, we must never move the
system.data xattr out of the inode body. For performance r
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Theodore Ts'o
commit 6e8ab72a812396996035a37e5ca4b3b99b5d214b upstream.
When converting from an inode from storing the data in-line to a data
block, ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock() was only
401 - 500 of 932 matches
Mail list logo