On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:32:20 -0500
David Long wrote:
David,
> From: Sandeepa Prabhu
>
> Kprobes needs simulation of instructions that cannot be stepped
> from a different memory location, e.g.: those instructions
> that uses PC-relative addressing. In simulation, the behaviour
> of the instruc
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, if I disable all the checks in pci_get_rom_size, I learn that my
>> video ROM consists entirely of 0xff bytes. Maybe there just isn't a
>> ROM shadow on my laptop.
>
> I t
Michal Hocko wrote:
> OK, that would suggest that the oom rework patches are not really
> related. They just moved from the livelock to a sleep which is good in
> general IMHO. We even know that it is most probably the IO that is the
> problem because we know that more than half of the reclaimable
On Friday 11 March 2016 06:14 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> @Lada I will fix up the changelog to add some of the background behind this
> change, and mark this for stable backport as well.
This is what I'm planning to add.
Noam please give this a spin - you might have to revert those native-endian DT
Hello Linus,
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Vishnu Patekar
> wrote:
>
>> The A83T has R_PIO pin controller, it's same as A23, execpt A83T
>> interrupt bit is 6th and A83T has one extra pin PL12.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Patekar
>> Ac
Hi, Andrew
On 03/11/16 at 12:27pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:42:48 +0800 Dave Young wrote:
>
> > On i686 PAE enabled machine the contiguous physical area could be large
> > and it can cause trimming down variables in below calculation in
> > read_vmcore() and mmap_vmcore():
>
2016-03-11 16:49 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski :
> Replace ifdef with __maybe_unused to silence compiler warning on when
> SUSPEND=n and PM=y:
>
> drivers/char/hw_random/exynos-rng.c:166:12: warning: ‘exynos_rng_suspend’
> defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int exynos_rng_suspend(s
Hello Tejun,
On (03/11/16 12:22), Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 07:21:52PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > I'd personally prefer to go with the "less dependency" option -- a dedicated
> > kthread, I think. mostly for the sake of simplicity. I agree with the point
> > that console
On Friday 04 March 2016 03:50 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Lada Trimasova
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 17:07:46 +0300
>
>> Since ezchip network driver is written with big endian EZChip platform it
>> is necessary to add support for little endian architecture.
>>
>> The first issue is that the orde
2016-03-12 3:46 GMT+09:00 Alan Stern :
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Could be related (the same?) with [0].
>>
>> I have a driver (hwrng/exynos-rng) which in probe does:
>> pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, EXYNOS_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY);
>> pm_runtime_us
W dniu 11.03.2016 o 16:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski pisze:
> Driver enabled runtime PM but did not revert this on removal. Re-binding
> of a device triggered warning:
> exynos-rng 10830400.rng: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!
>
> Fixes: b329669ea0b5 ("hwrng: exynos - Add support for Exynos random n
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 10:32:49AM +0530, Neha Rani wrote:
> But it was warned by checkpatch.pl and after modifying, no warning. How can it
> be wrong?
I'll turn it around and ask you how do you know it is correct? :)
hint, it isn't, read Documentation/CodingStyle please.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 08:51:26AM +0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 20:45, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 8 March 2016 at 20:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:40:14PM +0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> On 8 March 2016 at 07:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> On 12 mrt. 2016, at 13:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 08:51:26AM +0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 8 March 2016 at 20:45, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 8 March 2016 at 20:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:40:14PM +0700, Ard
Put a reminder that during device removal drivers should revert all PM
runtime changes from the probe. Also add a note that
pm_runtime_disable() won't wait for pending suspend requests if
autosuspend is not disabled before.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
---
Documentation/power/runtime_pm.tx
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 01:55:44PM +0800, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
>
> > On 12 mrt. 2016, at 13:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 08:51:26AM +0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> On 8 March 2016 at 20:45, Ard Biesheuvel
> >>> wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 20:4
Hi Tejun,
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello, Parav.
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 04:45:09PM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
>>> Design that remains same from v6 to v10.
>>> * spin lock is still fine graine
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 01:39:01AM +, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> On 2016/03/11, 18:29, "lustre-devel on behalf of James Simmons"
> jsimm...@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> >Apply a consistent style for comments in the lnet selftest
> >code.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: James Simmons
> >---
> > drivers/stag
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:24:00PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 01:39:01AM +, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> > On 2016/03/11, 18:29, "lustre-devel on behalf of James Simmons"
> > > jsimm...@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > >Apply a consistent style for comments in the lne
On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 10:41 -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patchset extends cgroup v2 to support rgroup (resource group) for
> in-process hierarchical resource control and implements PRIO_RGRP for
> setpriority(2) on top to allow in-process hierarchical CPU cycle
> control in a seamless
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:25:32PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:24:00PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 01:39:01AM +, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> > > On 2016/03/11, 18:29, "lustre-devel on behalf of James Simmons"
> > > > > jsimm...@in
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:44:16PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> >
> > At the end of the day it's about whether you trust the userspace
> > program or not.
>
> There's a big difference between "give the user rope", and "tie the
> rope in a
I don't know exactly how it's broken, but with that patch segment counting is
broken - I'm seeing blk_rq_map_sg() overrun the end of the sgtable.
I suggest reverting it for 4.5...
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:41:40PM -0800, Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:45:18PM -0500, YU Bo wrote:
Fix comments to use trailing */ on separate lines.
Signed-off-by: YU BO
You sent me 2 patches that did different things yet had the same
subject line :(
Please fix up and re
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 06:11:57PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> Meelis reported that qla2000 driver does not get loaded on one sparc
> >> system.
> >>
> >> schizo f00732d0: PCI host bridge to bus 0001:00
> >> pci_bus 0001:00: root bus r
Hi,
does anyone know the answer to the questions below?
> The other direction (making two controls which both do the same and update
> each other's value) doesn't seem to be easily available.
> Should I write a _put handler that does it manually?
> (Or should that be handled by alsa-lib mixer
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 01:56:13AM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Some tracing printk() show that we are calling update_sample() with totally
> bogus arguments.
>
> There are a few good calls, then I see rmid=-380863112 evt_type=-30689 first=0
>
> That turns into a wild vrmid, and we fault accessing
701 - 727 of 727 matches
Mail list logo
