3.18.27-rt27-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yang Shi
fsf2_lock_all() calls down_write_nest_lock() to acquire a rw_sem and check
a mutex, but down_write_nest_lock() is designed for two rw_sem accoring to the
comment in include/
3.18.27-rt27-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mike Galbraith
homer: # nm kernel/sched/core.o|grep preemptible_lazy
00b5 t preemptible_lazy
echo wakeup_rt > current_tracer ==> Welcome to infinity.
Signed-off-by: Mik
3.18.27-rt27-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yang Shi
When running -rt kernel with both PREEMPT_OFF_HIST and LOCKDEP enabled,
the below error is reported:
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.4.1-rt6 #1 Not tainted
include/tra
3.18.27-rt27-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
In the non-RT case the spin_lock_irq() here disables interrupts as well
as raw_spin_lock_irq(). So in the unlock case the interrupts are enabled
too early.
3.18.27-rt27-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yang Shi
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:917
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 383, name: sh
Preemption disabled at:[] kgdb_c
3.18.27-rt27-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Thomas Gleixner
Otherwise we end up with the following:
|=
|[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
|4.4.2-rt7+ #5 Not tainted
|---
3.18.27-rt27-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Clark Williams
RT has dropped support of rcu_bh, comment out in rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Clark Williams
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
3.18.27-rt27-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mike Galbraith
DRM folks identified the spots, so use them.
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Cc: linux-rt-users
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
Signed-
3.18.27-rt27-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
With completion using swait and so rawlocks we don't need this anymore.
Further, bisect thinks this patch is responsible for:
|BUG: unable to handle kernel
3.18.27-rt27-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Probably in the rebase onto v4.1 this check got moved into less commonly used
preempt_schedule_notrace(). This patch ensures that both functions use it.
Re
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > Apologies for ping (I hate doing that), but I haven't heard anything
> > from you. Do you want me to re-submit this set, or are you willing to
> > take this and apply the relevant Acks?
> >
>
On 03/02/2016 01:55 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Stephen Boyd [160301 10:55]:
drivers/clk/ti/clk-814x.c:34:12: warning: symbol 'dm814x_adpll_early_init' was
not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/clk/ti/clk-814x.c:58:12: warning: symbol
'dm814x_adpll_enable_init_clocks' was not declared. Sh
3.18.27-rt27-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
With interrupts off it makes no sense to do the long path since we can't
leave the CPU anyway. Also we might end up in a recursion with lockdep.
Signed-off
3.18.27-rt27-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
A softirq on -RT can be preempted. That means one task is in
__dev_queue_xmit(), gets preempted and another task may enter
__dev_queue_xmit() aw well. netpe
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:27:49PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 03/02/2016 05:50 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:51:59PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
[...]
> > Is all the above necessary?
> >
> > Surely we can just include in mm/kasan/kasan.c?
>
> It is necessary.
3.18.27-rt27-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
In 7675104990ed ("sched: Implement lockless wake-queues") we gained
lockless wake-queues. -RT managed to lockup itself with those. There
could be multiple a
Dear RT Folks,
This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.18.27-rt27-rc1.
Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when
the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release can
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c
index aa217e2..2336bac 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c
@@ -22,26 +22,48 @@
#include
#
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
With interrupts off it makes no sense to do the long path since we can't
leave the CPU anyway. Also we might end up in a recursion with lockdep.
Signed-off
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yang Shi
fsf2_lock_all() calls down_write_nest_lock() to acquire a rw_sem and check
a mutex, but down_write_nest_lock() is designed for two rw_sem accoring to the
comment in include/
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
In the non-RT case the spin_lock_irq() here disables interrupts as well
as raw_spin_lock_irq(). So in the unlock case the interrupts are enabled
too early.
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
With completion using swait and so rawlocks we don't need this anymore.
Further, bisect thinks this patch is responsible for:
|BUG: unable to handle kernel
Thanks Arnaldo,
Please find my comments.
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 07:55 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 02:37:45PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
use_browser = 0;
+ if (!field_order &&
+ is_perf_data_reorded_on_ppc(session->evlist) &&
Hello, Jiri.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:10:00PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > 1. didn't help, the problem persists. So I haven't applied the patch from 2.
>
> FWIW I dumped more info about the wq:
> wq->name='hci0' pwq=8800390d7600 wq->dfl_pwq=8800390d5200
> pwq->refcnt=2 pwq->nr_active=0
Dear RT Folks,
This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.14.61-rt64-rc1.
Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when
the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release can
Le 23/02/2016 15:39, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> In an invalid randconfig build (fixed by another patch),
> I ran across this warning:
>
> arch/arm/include/debug/at91.S:18:0: error: "CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_VIRT" redefined
> [-Werror]
> #define CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_VIRT AT91_IO_P2V(CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_PHYS)
3.12.54-rt74-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Probably in the rebase onto v4.1 this check got moved into less commonly used
preempt_schedule_notrace(). This patch ensures that both functions use it.
Re
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:38:26PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:28:42PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:32:39PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 02:36:24PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > From: Andi Kleen
> > > >
> > > > Add a
3.12.54-rt74-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
With completion using swait and so rawlocks we don't need this anymore.
Further, bisect thinks this patch is responsible for:
|BUG: unable to handle kernel
3.10.97-rt107-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
The softirqd runs in -RT with SCHED_FIFO (prio 1) and deals mostly with
timer wakeup which can not happen in hardirq context. The prio has been
risen from
3.10.97-rt107-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
We unlock the lock while the interrupts are off. This isn't a problem
now but will get because the migrate_disable() + enable are not
symmetrical in regard
On 3/2/2016 4:53 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Merge all IP blocks into a single enum. This allows for easier block
name use later. Drop superfluous "_BLOCK" from the enum names.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Aravind Gopalakrishnan
enum amd_ip_types {
- SMCA_F17H_CORE_BLOCK = 0,
3.12.54-rt74-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mike Galbraith
homer: # nm kernel/sched/core.o|grep preemptible_lazy
00b5 t preemptible_lazy
echo wakeup_rt > current_tracer ==> Welcome to infinity.
Signed-off-by: Mik
3.10.97-rt107-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
With interrupts off it makes no sense to do the long path since we can't
leave the CPU anyway. Also we might end up in a recursion with lockdep.
Signed-of
3.10.97-rt107-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
With completion using swait and so rawlocks we don't need this anymore.
Further, bisect thinks this patch is responsible for:
|BUG: unable to handle kerne
3.12.54-rt74-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
---
localversion-rt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/localversion-rt b/localversion-rt
index e8ada8cdb471..8dd12f3c29cb
On 3/2/16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:00:49PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >
>> > Right, most odd. Sedat, could you provide objdump -D of the relevant
>> > sections of vmlinux ?
>> >
>>
>> Can you give some clear instructions - for what shall I look for in
>> special?
>
> o
3.10.97-rt107-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
preempt_disable() invokes preempt_count_add() which saves the caller in
current->preempt_disable_ip. It uses CALLER_ADDR1 which does not look for its
calle
3.10.97-rt107-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yang Shi
When running -rt kernel with both PREEMPT_OFF_HIST and LOCKDEP enabled,
the below error is reported:
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.4.1-rt6 #1 Not tainted
include/tr
3.10.97-rt107-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Clark Williams
RT has dropped support of rcu_bh, comment out in rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Clark Williams
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
3.10.97-rt107-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
If the NET_RX uses up all of his budget it moves the following NAPI
invocations into the `ksoftirqd`. On -RT it does not do so. Instead it
rises the NET_RX
3.10.97-rt107-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
---
localversion-rt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/localversion-rt b/localversion-rt
index 8111d0b4d38d..c01084d72cc
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:22:47PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 01:59:12PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:07:50PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 03:01:19AM +, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
>
> [...
Dear RT Folks,
This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.10.97-rt107-rc1.
Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when
the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release ca
3.12.54-rt74-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
If the NET_RX uses up all of his budget it moves the following NAPI
invocations into the `ksoftirqd`. On -RT it does not do so. Instead it
rises the NET_RX
3.10.97-rt107-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Atleast on X86 we die a recursive death
|CPU: 3 PID: 585 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.1-rt4+ #198
|Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:32:15AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 03/01/2016 03:44 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.99 release.
> >There are 80 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one. If anyone has any iss
3.12.54-rt74-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
In the non-RT case the spin_lock_irq() here disables interrupts as well
as raw_spin_lock_irq(). So in the unlock case the interrupts are enabled
too early.
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Atleast on X86 we die a recursive death
|CPU: 3 PID: 585 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.1-rt4+ #198
|Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS D
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
The softirqd runs in -RT with SCHED_FIFO (prio 1) and deals mostly with
timer wakeup which can not happen in hardirq context. The prio has been
risen from t
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Clark Williams
RT has dropped support of rcu_bh, comment out in rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Clark Williams
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
We unlock the lock while the interrupts are off. This isn't a problem
now but will get because the migrate_disable() + enable are not
symmetrical in regard
Allow a user to read PWM Capture results from /sysfs. First,
the user must tell PWM Capture which channel they wish to
read from:
$ echo 2 > $PWMCHIP/capture
To start a capture and read the result, simply read the file:
$ cat $PWMCHIP/capture
The output format is left to the device.
Signed
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
If the NET_RX uses up all of his budget it moves the following NAPI
invocations into the `ksoftirqd`. On -RT it does not do so. Instead it
rises the NET_RX
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Probably in the rebase onto v4.1 this check got moved into less commonly used
preempt_schedule_notrace(). This patch ensures that both functions use it.
Re
3.12.54-rt74-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
With interrupts off it makes no sense to do the long path since we can't
leave the CPU anyway. Also we might end up in a recursion with lockdep.
Signed-off
3.12.54-rt74-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
The softirqd runs in -RT with SCHED_FIFO (prio 1) and deals mostly with
timer wakeup which can not happen in hardirq context. The prio has been
risen from t
3.12.54-rt74-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
preempt_disable() invokes preempt_count_add() which saves the caller in
current->preempt_disable_ip. It uses CALLER_ADDR1 which does not look for its
caller
3.12.54-rt74-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Atleast on X86 we die a recursive death
|CPU: 3 PID: 585 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.1-rt4+ #198
|Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS D
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yang Shi
When running -rt kernel with both PREEMPT_OFF_HIST and LOCKDEP enabled,
the below error is reported:
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.4.1-rt6 #1 Not tainted
include/tra
On 3/2/2016 4:50 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Ok, applied with a bunch of changes ontop.
Thanks!
The second patch is relying on the assumption that a
hwid of 0 is invalid. Is that so?
Yes, HWID of 0 is invalid.
Thanks,
-Aravind.
3.12.54-rt74-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yang Shi
When running -rt kernel with both PREEMPT_OFF_HIST and LOCKDEP enabled,
the below error is reported:
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.4.1-rt6 #1 Not tainted
include/tra
Dear RT Folks,
This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.12.54-rt74-rc1.
Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when
the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release can
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yang Shi
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:917
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 383, name: sh
Preemption disabled at:[] kgdb_c
3.12.54-rt74-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
We unlock the lock while the interrupts are off. This isn't a problem
now but will get because the migrate_disable() + enable are not
symmetrical in regard
On 3/2/2016 4:54 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:46:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, mce_amd: Correct error paths
We need to unwind properly when we fail to find the proper decoding
functions. Streamline error messages to resemble the rest of this fi
[ Resend with reply all, instead of just "reply" ]
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:53:36 +0100
Sedat Dilek wrote:
> 8110f3f0 :
> 8110f3f0: 55 push %rbp
> 8110f3f1: 48 89 e5mov%rsp,%rbp
> 8110f3f4: 41 57
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> There is no need to hide function declarations, and making
> these visible to the SoC specific host drivers lets us
> use __maybe_unused and IS_ENABLED() checks to control
> their use, rather than having to use #ifdef to hide all
> callers.
>
> Signed-of
3.12.54-rt74-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Clark Williams
RT has dropped support of rcu_bh, comment out in rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Clark Williams
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
Currently, printk() sometimes waits for message to be printed to console
and sometimes it does not (when console_sem is held by some other
process). In case printk() grabs console_sem and starts printing to
console, it prints messages from kernel printk buffer until the buffer
is empty. When serial
Hello,
(cc'ing Jan)
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 02:19:20PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:01:12PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello, Peter.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:24:30PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > > > You might want to complain to the block-layer people about th
The spear keyboard driver uses #ifdef CONFIG_PM to hide its
power management functions, but then uses references from
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS that are only present if both CONFIG_PM
and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP are set, resulting in a warning about unused
functions:
drivers/input/keyboard/spear-keyboard.c:292:12
The sirf dma driver uses #ifdef to check for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
for its suspend/resume code but then has no #ifdef for the
respective runtime PM code, so we get a warning if CONFIG_PM
is disabled altogether:
drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c:1000:12: error: 'sirfsoc_dma_runtime_resume' defined but
not used [-W
The rockchip spdif driver uses SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS to conditionally
set its power management functions, but we get a warning
about rk_spdif_runtime_resume being unused when CONFIG_PM is not
set:
sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_spdif.c:67:12: error: 'rk_spdif_runtime_resume'
defined but not used [-Werro
The cw1200 uses #ifdef to check for CONFIG_PM, but then
uses SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS, which leaves the references out when
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not defined, so we get a warning with
PM=y && PM_SLEEP=n:
drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/cw1200_spi.c:450:12: error: 'cw1200_spi_suspend'
defined but not used [-
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 06:50 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:27:09PM +, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
My From: is Sudip Mukherjee
and my Signed-off-by: is Sudip Mukherjee
My From name and Signed-off name matches. But my emails donot match.
The mvumi scsi hides the references to its suspend/resume functions
in an #ifdef but does not hide the implementation the same way:
drivers/scsi/mvumi.c:2632:12: error: 'mvumi_suspend' defined but not used
[-Werror=unused-function]
drivers/scsi/mvumi.c:2651:12: error: 'mvumi_resume' defined but n
The amd-xgbe ethernet driver hides its suspend/resume functions
in #ifdef CONFIG_PM, but uses SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() to make the
reference conditional on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, which results in a
warning when PM_SLEEP is not set but PM is:
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-main.c:833:12: warning: 'xgbe_su
Hello Maxime,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:18:58PM +0800, Vishnu Patekar wrote:
>> A83T has CPUS clock similar to A80's. currently, a80 cpus clock only
>> compiled for A80. So, Introduce MACH_SUN8I_A83T to compile it for
>> A83T as well
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
preempt_disable() invokes preempt_count_add() which saves the caller in
current->preempt_disable_ip. It uses CALLER_ADDR1 which does not look for its
caller
Reviving this thread...
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 14 December 2015 09:45:48 Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Linus Walleij
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:
The exynos random driver uses #ifdef to check for CONFIG_PM, but
then uses SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS, which leaves the references out when
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not defined, so we get a warning with
PM=y && PM_SLEEP=n:
drivers/char/hw_random/exynos-rng.c:166:12: error: 'exynos_rng_suspend' defined
but not u
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mike Galbraith
homer: # nm kernel/sched/core.o|grep preemptible_lazy
00b5 t preemptible_lazy
echo wakeup_rt > current_tracer ==> Welcome to infinity.
Signed-off-by: Mik
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mike Galbraith
DRM folks identified the spots, so use them.
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Cc: linux-rt-users
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
Signed-
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
---
localversion-rt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/localversion-rt b/localversion-rt
index b0e8dd7bd707..c64934cc5dfa
I found many variations of the bug in these device drivers (and some
USB drivers I already send patches for in a separate series).
In each case, the power management operations structure conditionally
references suspend/resume functions, but the functions are hidden
in an incorrect #ifdef or not h
Le 02/03/2016 16:58, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> The at91-pio4 pinctrl driver uses SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() to
> conditionally set the correct suspend/resume options, but they
> become unused when CONFIG_PM is disabled:
>
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:827:12: error: 'atmel_pctrl_suspend'
>
When there are too many messages in the kernel printk buffer it can take
very long to print them to console (especially when using slow serial
console). This is undesirable during oops so when we encounter oops and
there are more than 100 messages to print, print just the newest 100
messages and th
The pm2301 charger driver uses nested #ifdefs to check for both
CONFIG_PM and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP in an attempt to hide its
suspend and runtime-pm operations when they are unused, but
it does not hide the clear_lpn_pin() function in the same
way, so we get a build warning when everything is
disabled:
The ipaq-micro driver uses SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() to
remove the reference to its resume function, but does
not use an #ifdef around the definition, so we get
a build warning:
drivers/mfd/ipaq-micro.c:379:12: error: 'micro_resume' defined but not used
[-Werror=unused-function]
This adds a __ma
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara
---
kernel/printk/printk.c | 35 ++-
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 03f5278b47b4..8ac60219059a 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/print
Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
A second batch of DT updates for 4.6. This time it is based on 4.5-rc3 as one
of the patches fixes an node that was changed during 4.5-rc phase. As I saw
that your "next/dt" branches are based on 4.5-rc3, I thought it wouldn't be a
problem.
Overall a pretty simple series with ma
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 02:48:29PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
> We are currently restricted when it comes to supporting DSI on devices
> that have a non-DSI control bus. For example, DSI encoder chips are
> available in the market that are configured via i2c. Configuring their
> registers via DSI
The at91-pio4 pinctrl driver uses SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() to
conditionally set the correct suspend/resume options, but they
become unused when CONFIG_PM is disabled:
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:827:12: error: 'atmel_pctrl_suspend'
defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
drivers/p
The omap3isp driver hides is power management functions using #ifdef
but it fails to hide the isp_suspend_modules/isp_resume_modules
functions in the same way, which leads to a build warning when
CONFIG_PM is disabled:
drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c:1183:12: error: 'isp_suspend_modules'
de
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 06:06:54PM -0500, Akshay Bhat wrote:
> Set hsync/vsync to active low for g121x1_l03 panel to match the
> recommended setting in datasheet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akshay Bhat
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Applied, thanks.
3.14.61-rt64-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
A softirq on -RT can be preempted. That means one task is in
__dev_queue_xmit(), gets preempted and another task may enter
__dev_queue_xmit() aw well. netpe
The SNVS power key driver has suspend/resume functions that
are accessed using SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS, which hide the reference
when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set, resulting in a warning about
unused functions:
drivers/input/keyboard/snvs_pwrkey.c:183:12: error: 'imx_snvs_pwrkey_suspend'
defined but not
The ipaq micro battery driver has suspend/resume functions that
are accessed using SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS, which hide the reference
when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set, resulting in a warning about
unused functions:
drivers/power/ipaq_micro_battery.c:284:12: error: 'micro_batt_suspend' defined
but not use
the st irqchip driver uses SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS to conditionally
set its power management functions, but we get a warning
about st_irq_syscfg_resume being unused when CONFIG_PM is not
set:
drivers/irqchip/irq-st.c:183:12: error: 'st_irq_syscfg_resume' defined but not
used [-Werror=unused-function]
601 - 700 of 1085 matches
Mail list logo