On 02/25, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> Quoting Oleg Nesterov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > kill_pid_info_as_uid() is solely used by drivers/usb/core/. The original
> > "[PATCH] Fix signal sending in usbdevio on async URB completion" commit
> > 46113830a18847cff8da73005e57bc49c2f95a56 was right, but nowada
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:28:51 -0800 mark gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > + /*just flush them all*/
> >
> > I'm surprised that checkpatch didn't grump about the odd commenting style.
>
> It didn't. What's odd about the comment style here?
We normally put a space after "/*" and before "*/"
We allocate an array of nr_cpu_ids pointers, so we should respect its bonds.
Delay change of _cpu_pda after array initialization.
Also take into account that alloc_bootmem_low() :
- calls panic() if not enough memory
- already clears allocated memory
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 20:42 +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> kill_pid_info_as_uid() is solely used by drivers/usb/core/. The original
> "[PATCH] Fix signal sending in usbdevio on async URB completion" commit
> 46113830a18847cff8da73005e57bc49c2f95a56 was right, but nowadays we use
> struct pid and th
Hi Andrew - would you add this to your -mm patchset? It fixes a
possible panic.
(I based it on 2.6.25-rc2 + 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 + my patches from broken-out-0223
as I could not get 2.6.25-rc2 + all of broken-out-0223 to apply.)
Thanks, Mike
..from Eric Dumazet:
> You might want to apply this patch.
The memory controller has a requirement that while writing values, we need
to use echo -n. This patch fixes the problem and makes the UI more consistent.
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/controllers/memory.txt |6 +++---
kernel/res_counter.c
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 13:09 +0100, Hans Rosenfeld wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:31:01AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > > - 4 bits for the page size, with 0 meaning native page size (4k on x86,
> > > > 8k on alpha, ...) and values 1-15 being specific to the architecture
> > > > (I used 1
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:19:18 -0800 Max Krasnyansky wrote:
Hi Max,
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 438a014..e74db94 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -488,6 +491,26 @@ void free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
}
Hi Olof,
> And even if you DO decide to go that route, guess what? You need a
> translation table just as with (3) anyway!
True.
3. use a glue layer with a translation map.
>>> In my opinion this is an OK solution since the same information has to
>>> be added somewhere already anyway -- ei
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:13:57 -0800 Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use __u32 for max_len to match the declaration of length in the
> struct fb_bitfield.
>
> Suppresses sparse shadowed variable warnings from the nested max()
> macros:
> drivers/video/console/fbcon.h:130:8: warning: sy
[ added Alan to CC ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The symbol 'mcount' has EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL attached to it. This is because
"things that use this symbol are too chummy with kernel internals to not be
derivative". However, the symbol may or may not actually be referenced by a
given module, dependin
Stefan Richter schrieb:
My conclusion so far: There is something wrong with your system which
is below/ before the control of the ieee1394 or firewire stack.
Yes. I agree with you. So i did a "make clean" and a "make" (not a make
-j3 as i use to do) and recompiled 2.6.25-rc3 and now it works
On Mon, 25 February 2008 09:48:22 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 15:07 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > shrink_page_list() would be expected to be passed pages pulled from
> > the active or inactive lists via isolate_lru_pages()? I would not have
> > expected to find the kernel
I'll send out a prototype for comment.
Something like the patch below. The effects of cgroup_disable=foo are:
- foo doesn't show up in /proc/cgroups
- foo isn't auto-mounted if you mount all cgroups in a single hierarchy
- foo isn't visible as an individually mountable subsystem
As a result th
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:57:23 +0100, Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > that you did, after taking care of detection and initialization.
> > Look at his dmesg in comment #44 in this:
>
> Yes, that looks very similar.
Someone reported on the bug that a firmware update exists to resolv
Le mardi 12 février 2008 à 08:33 +, Tvrtko A. Ursulin a écrit :
> On Saturday 09 February 2008 22:01:44 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Feb 9 2008 13:29, Tvrtko A. Ursulin wrote:
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >As the subject says I get ~1 minute delay when booting 2.6.24.1
> > >pretty reliably. It is po
Thomas Meyer wrote:
So i did a "make clean" and a "make" (not a make
-j3 as i use to do) and recompiled 2.6.25-rc3 and now it works again.
Case closed under strange error.
2.6.24 works with the same config, i.e. both drivers are build as
modules.
What a relief. :-) Thanks for retesting.
--
St
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Commit 6c231bd5eb07ce546517019f334652b9ecfc329a
> generate this warning:
>
> drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c: In function 'tpacpi_input_send_tabletsw':
> include/linux/input.h:1290: warning: 'state' is used uninitialized in
> this function
> drivers/misc/t
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:17:07PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What I want is that e.g. after fiddling with kernel headers I want an
> > easy way of having much compile coverage. And my script that builds
> > all defconfig's is trivial (although
Thomas Meyer wrote:
So i did a "make clean" and a "make" (not a make -j3 as i use to do)
and recompiled 2.6.25-rc3 and now it works again. Case closed under
strange error.
2.6.24 works with the same config, i.e. both drivers are build as
modules.
BTW, of course "make -j..." is supposed to wor
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:57:46 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The memory controller has a requirement that while writing values, we need
> to use echo -n. This patch fixes the problem and makes the UI more consistent.
that's a decent improvement ;)
btw, could I ask that you, Paul
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 01:29:03PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:48:42PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> quad core 8 socket system will have apic id lifting.the apic id range could
>> be [4, 0x23]. and apic_is_clustered_box will think that need to three
>> clusters
>> and th
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:45:12AM +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> During compilation:
>
> LD [M] drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_core.o
> WARNING: drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_core.o(.data+0x1d4): Section mismatch in
> reference from the variable pccard_sysfs_interface to the function
> .devinit.text:pccard
I could have sworn that we had patches that made KVM
depend on !VOYAGER and !VISWS, but with 2.6.25-rc3 and linux-next,
it's possible to select VOYAGER machine type (x86_32) and then
enable KVM and watch the build fail.
ERROR: "smp_ops" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko] undefined!
make[1]: *** [__modpost] Err
From: Chris Dearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
When checking for the swap header try byteswapping the endianess dependent
fields to allow the swap partition to be shared between big & little endian
systems.
Signed-off-by: Chris Dearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.o
/home/jeremy/hg/xen/paravirt/linux/arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c:59:27: error:
asm/kmemcheck.h: No such file or directory
asm-x86/kmemcheck.h does seem to be completely missing. Looks like
8db0acefb3025795abe3f37669354677a03de680 "x86: add hooks for kmemcheck"
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 06:19:57PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The reason I added GPL is not because of some idea that this is all
> > "chummy" with the kernel. But because I derived the mcount code from
> > glibc's version of mcount. Now you may argue that glibc is under LGPL
> > and a non-GPL e
Hello,
I have two DVD drives, one connected to the SATA port (LG) the other to the
IDE port (PHILIPS) of a via chipset.
They are driven by VIA SATA support (SATA_VIA) and VIA PATA support
(PATA_VIA).
When I write an iso image to the drive on the SATA port /dev/sr0 it has some
extra bytes on di
2008/2/25, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>
> > Commit 6c231bd5eb07ce546517019f334652b9ecfc329a
> > generate this warning:
> >
> > drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c: In function 'tpacpi_input_send_tabletsw':
> > include/linux/input.h:129
Hi Stephane,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:00 PM, stephane eranian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have finally released the perfmon2 kernel patch for kernel v2.6.24. It
> took longer than expected to due my job change and several technical issues
> related to perfmon kernel bugs.
[snip]
> As usu
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 08:34:23PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Does this patch fix the problem?
It does fix the problem on my system.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.ke
"Kiyoshi Ueda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm looking at this problem, but currently no idea why the conversion
> to blk_end_request causes it.
cdrom_newpc_intr apparently never sets rq->sense_len.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Gabriel C wrote:
> >>> Booting nohz=off fixes that.
> >>>
> >>> Another strange thing is when I try to boot that kernel with
> >>> clocksource=acpi_pm it just hangs.
What happens if you add clocksource=acpi_pm and nohz=off to the kernel
commandline ?
> >> Please post your ful
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend on lid close and Fn-F4).
This no longer happens in 2.6.25-rc3: I see nothing in /var/log/acpid
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend on lid close and Fn-F4).
This no longer happens in 2.6.25-rc3: I see nothing in /var/log/acpid
after power on:
[Mon Feb 25
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 07:53:20PM +0100, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Mon, 25 February 2008 09:48:22 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 15:07 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > > shrink_page_list() would be expected to be passed pages pulled from
> > > the active or inactive lists via iso
On Monday 25 February 2008, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> I thought that init sections were deliberatly pushed to the end of the
> kernel when linked, cirtainly on my laptop here that seems to be so.
> That would make the first two "after" the kernel. The other two appear
> to be before the traditional
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> The only possible solution is to have the drivers themselves be
> responsible for preventing calls to device_add() or device_register()
> during a system sleep. (It's also necessary to prevent driver binding,
> but this isn't a major issue.) The most st
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:13:17 -0800, "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/head64.c | 45
> > +++--
> > 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/h
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
> such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
> and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend on lid close and Fn-F4).
You me
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:27:10PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > As I understand it if Vladis wants to submit his own change to the symbol
> > thats up to him, and he'll be liable for any fallout with the FSF, or
> > harm to Linux resulting, so long he's the one who signs it off.
>
> Why isn't any
On 2008.02.07 00:58:42 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> current mainline triggers:
>
> WARNING: at /home/tglx/work/kernel/x86/linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:52
> kmap_atomic_prot+0xe5/0x19b()
> Modules linked in: ahci(+) sata_sil libata sd_mod scsi_mod raid1 ext3 jbd
> ehci_hcd ohci_hcd uhci_
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > What do you think of the patch attached to comment #40 in the Bugzilla
> > entry?
> >
>
> Looks ok. As long as those two synchronization points are guaranteed,
> then I'm happy.
Maybe a better approach would be to leave the workqueue unfreezable,
a
From: "Hawkes Steve-FSH016" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:47:11 -0600
> > .facility = NULL
>
> How about this?
Actually, for compile time initializations, setting
anything to zero is superfluous and by convention
is not therefore explicitly done in the sources.
--
To unsubscribe
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 02:48:35PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:27:10PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > As I understand it if Vladis wants to submit his own change to the symbol
> > > thats up to him, and he'll be liable for any fallout with the FSF, or
> > > harm to Linux re
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 09:47 -0600, Hawkes Steve-FSH016 wrote:
> How about this?
line wrapped, but seems better.
> Signed-off-by: Steve Hawkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff -uprN linux-2.6.24/include/linux/kernel.h
> linux-2.6.24-printk_ratelimit/include/linux/kernel.h
> --- linux-2.6.24/include/
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 2.6.25-rc2-git7 has regression, thinkpad keys do not work any more.
> >
> > Probably this commit broke things 6c231bd5eb07ce546517019f334652b9ecfc329a
This commit is indeed broken, and I have a tentative fix for it. But I'd
like to have a better
Björn Steinbrink wrote:
On 2008.02.07 00:58:42 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
current mainline triggers:
WARNING: at /home/tglx/work/kernel/x86/linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:52
kmap_atomic_prot+0xe5/0x19b()
Modules linked in: ahci(+) sata_sil libata sd_mod scsi_mod raid1 ext3 jbd
ehci_hcd
On 02/23/2008 12:48 PM, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>
> I don't see the connection between (no-)smp and ata. Something with
> interrupt routing/IPI, missing irq ack? Booting another !SMP kernel
> works fine. The problem also exists in 2.6.24-rc2.
>
"nosmp" disables the IO-APIC which will change interru
On 02/25, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 20:42 +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > kill_pid_info_as_uid() is solely used by drivers/usb/core/. The original
> > "[PATCH] Fix signal sending in usbdevio on async URB completion" commit
> > 46113830a18847cff8da73005e57bc49c2f95a56 was rig
--- Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...
> >
> > I think we should omit the permission checks completely, the task which
> does
> > ioctl(USBDEVFS_SUBMITURB) explicitly asks to send the signal to it, we
> should
> > not deny the signal even if the task changes its credentials in a
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 07:15:57PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:52:25PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > Booting an x86 SMP PC with todays git-snaps
J.C. Pizarro schrieb:
> 2008/2/25, Ady Wicaksono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I have 8 Gbytes RAM, but why I can allocate 2.8 Gbytes RAM for a single
>> process?
>> How to patch kernel so I have more than 2.8 Gbytes limitation?
>>
>> Kernel:
>> ---
>> Linux xxx.com 2.6.9-023
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 07:15:57PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:52:25PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:58:00PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> you know I've just take a look on different architectures and I suddenly
> realized that I even can't test my changes I'm bringnin in. For example -
> xtensa arch, most of lds numeric constants could (and should) be cha
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:02:26 + Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2008, Peter Osterlund told this:
>
> > Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> But while I'd normally blame pktcdvd there's only one pktcdvd function
> >> in these tracebacks (pkt_open) and it's not got a significant stack
Hi all,
I experience very rare freezes at heavy outbound traffic
(sending ~4GB DVD image to another host(s) on the same LAN)
using skge driver (NIC on the mobo) as well as (recently tested)
using rtl8139 or dmfe NICs on the PCI bus. There is a single
switch between them (tested with another one
On 2008.02.25 15:08:35 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Björn Steinbrink wrote:
>> Hm, do you have lockdep enabled? If not, does lockdep make this go away?
>> Because lockdep will set IRQF_DISABLED for all interrupt handlers, and
>> unless that flag is set, handle_IRQ_event will reenable interrupts whil
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:12:47 +0100 "J.C. Pizarro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's statistic, yes, but it's a very important parameter for the
> CPU-scheduler.
> The CPU-scheduler will know the number of context switches of each task
> before of to take a blind decision into infinitum!.
We alr
From: Steve Hawkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The printk_ratelimit() and net_ratelimit() functions each have their own
tunable parameters to control their respective rate limiting feature, but
they share common state variables, preventing independent tuning of the
parameters from working correctly. Also,
Hello!
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CC arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.o
> /home/jeremy/hg/xen/paravirt/linux/arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c:59:27: error:
> asm/kmemcheck.h: No such file or directory
>
>
> asm-x86/kmemcheck.h does seem to be comp
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
> > such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
> > and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend
On Mon, 25 February 2008 13:46:32 -0600, Dave McCracken wrote:
> On Monday 25 February 2008, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > I thought that init sections were deliberatly pushed to the end of the
> > kernel when linked, cirtainly on my laptop here that seems to be so.
> > That would make the first two "a
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:09:03PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Being able to sue someone who has so many lawsuits that there's anyway
> no money left for me sounds like a bad compensation for serving a few
> years in jail... [1]
If the FSF wrote the code then he should ask the FSF, that seems si
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
> > such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acp
Booting 2.6.25-rc3 on my Ultra5 causes a hang before or as
the console is switched over to the framebuffer. The console
output is (extrapolated from dmesg in -rc2 and handwritten
notes, as I don't have a serial cable to my U5):
PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 'OBP 3.25.3 2000/06/29 14:12'
PROMLIB: Roo
On 02/25, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
> --- Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > ...
> > >
> > > I think we should omit the permission checks completely, the task which
> > does
> > > ioctl(USBDEVFS_SUBMITURB) explicitly asks to send the signal to it, we
> > should
> > > not deny t
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:08:35 -0500 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bj__rn Steinbrink wrote:
> > On 2008.02.07 00:58:42 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> current mainline triggers:
> >>
> >> WARNING: at
> >> /home/tglx/work/kernel/x86/linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:52
> >> kmap_atom
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:31:21 +0100 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed tsc is always marked unstable on my box with 2.6.25* , 2.6.24 is
> fine.
>
> ...
>
> [0.825760] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :03:0e.0[A] -> GSI 22 (level, low) ->
> IRQ 22
> [0.805755] Switched to h
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:56:09 +0100 Peter Osterlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> drivers/block/pktcdvd.c | 16
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c b/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c
> index 674cd66..f2510e7 100644
> --- a/driver
* Vegard Nossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > asm-x86/kmemcheck.h does seem to be completely missing. Looks like
> > 8db0acefb3025795abe3f37669354677a03de680 "x86: add hooks for
> > kmemcheck" should have added the file.
>
> Hm. This is x86#testing, no? I don't think there's any kmemcheck
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
> > such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acp
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 08:38:22PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Kiyoshi Ueda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm looking at this problem, but currently no idea why the conversion
> > to blk_end_request causes it.
>
> cdrom_newpc_intr apparently never sets rq->sense_len.
>
actually it does
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Gabriel C wrote:
> Booting nohz=off fixes that.
>
> Another strange thing is when I try to boot that kernel with
> clocksource=acpi_pm it just hangs.
>
> What happens if you add clocksource=acpi_pm and nohz=off to the kernel
> commandli
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 05:03:54PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> This commit is indeed broken, and I have a tentative fix for it. But I'd
> like to have a better description of just "how" the thinkpad keys do not
> work anymore, to make sure I fix the entire breakage in one go. I wi
> > Hm. This is x86#testing, no? I don't think there's any kmemcheck
> > code whatsoever in other branches.
ah. that was x86.git#mm i think - a kmemcheck commit indeed prematurely
got into that branch.
I've updated x86.git and it should all have the correct ordering now.
(as of HEAD c9d2f5489
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Did you guys stop accepting reports by mail?
I hope not.
It is easier to track bug information in bugzilla.
If you for some reason do not wish to create a bug report,
I can do it for you. You only need to provide acpidump.
and attach acpidump?
I'll see if I can get
ir_probe allocated struct i2c_client on stack;
it's pretty big structure, so allocate it with kzalloc
make checkstack output without this patch:
x059d ir_probe [ir-kbd-i2c]: 1000
compile tested only
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Ch
Marin Mitov wrote:
Hi all,
I experience very rare freezes at heavy outbound traffic
(sending ~4GB DVD image to another host(s) on the same LAN)
using skge driver (NIC on the mobo) as well as (recently tested)
using rtl8139 or dmfe NICs on the PCI bus. There is a single
switch between them (te
On 2/24/08, Ady Wicaksono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 8 Gbytes RAM, but why I can allocate 2.8 Gbytes RAM for a single
> process?
> How to patch kernel so I have more than 2.8 Gbytes limitation?
>
> Kernel:
> ---
> Linux xxx.com 2.6.9-023stab046.2-enterprise #1
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to wake up fine from suspend to ram.
Not so 2.6.25-rc3: it hangs on suspend to ram, with a blank screen.
At one point I got lucky and got this on console (wrote down by hand,
there could be typos):
ata1: COMRESET failed (errno=-16)
ata1: COMRESET failed (errno=-16)
end
On Monday, 25 of February 2008, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypres
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 05:03:54PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > This commit is indeed broken, and I have a tentative fix for it. But I'd
> > like to have a better description of just "how" the thinkpad keys do not
> > work anymore, to
On Monday, 25 of February 2008, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to wake up fine from suspend to ram.
> Not so 2.6.25-rc3: it hangs on suspend to ram, with a blank screen.
Thanks for the report.
> At one point I got lucky and got this on console (wrote down by hand,
> ther
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
git bisect points at this commit:
commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2.
power_state: get rid of write-only variable in SATA
Hello Pavel --
It looks like this not a write-only variable after all...
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Hi,
Firstly apologies for trimming linux-kernel and linux-wireless from my reply
to Ivo yesterday. Basically, I replied saying that the patch below didn't fix
the problem. But please do read on...
On Friday 22 February 2008, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> On Friday 22 February 2008, Chris Clayton wrote
> > I thought the way to use the *_nested() calls was "consistently"!
>
> Very much depends on your view of consistent :-)
>
> > That is, if one instance of a lock access uses it, they all should,
> > since that's the only way lockdep learns about equivalence classes.
> > Also, locks shouldn't move
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:31:22PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 07:15:57PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
From: Casey Schaufler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions smk_cipso_doi and smk_unlbl_ambient are not used
outside smackfs.c and should hence be static.
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
security/smack/smackfs.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
d
Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
Hello hpa,
I failed to find a comment referring to 0x413 or int 0x12 in
arch/x86/kernel. I do know the comment in Documentation/i386/boot.txt,
however, suggesting that "INT 12h" _should_ be used, but that it would
be pointless for zImage and old bzImage kernels, be
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:27:10 +0200, Adrian Bunk said:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 06:19:57PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
(Following was actually Steve Rostedt writing):
> > > The reason I added GPL is not because of some idea that this is all
> > > "chummy" with the kernel. But because I derived the mcou
Hi!
> On Monday, 25 of February 2008, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi
My 2.2GHz [1] Thinkpad T61 is unable to get past 1.2GHz, seemingly
because of the _PPC ACPI objects [2].
Given that the _PPC object is different for both cores, is this more
of a BIOS bug or an ACPI interpreter problem? The problem was present
in 2.6.24-rc, 2.6.24 final and since.
BIOS is 7LETA9W
James,
Thanks for the reply. We will resubmit the patch to rollback it to our
original implementation.
Regards.
Bo Yang
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 11:36 AM
To: Yang, Bo
Cc: Matthew Wilcox; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAI
On Monday 25 February 2008 08:28:14 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Grant Grundler wrote:
> > ISTR there was a time when tulip would compete with de4x5 for devices.
> > tulip is the preferred driver. That's clearly no longer the case
> > and perhaps both distro's need to revisit this.
>
> The only reason why
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> > On Monday, 25 of February 2008, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin"
Pavel Machek wrote:
commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2
Author: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Feb 21 13:56:55 2008 +0100
power_state: get rid of write-only variable in SATA
This is pretty unlikely to be it. Can you double check that this patch
really breaks somet
On Monday 25 February 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 25 of February 2008, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to wake up fine from suspend to ram.
> > Not so 2.6.25-rc3: it hangs on suspend to ram, with a blank screen.
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> > At one po
On Monday 25 February 2008 10:53:01 pm you wrote:
> Marin Mitov wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I experience very rare freezes at heavy outbound traffic
> > (sending ~4GB DVD image to another host(s) on the same LAN)
> > using skge driver (NIC on the mobo) as well as (recently tested)
> > using rtl8139
Benny Halevy wrote:
On Feb. 24, 2008, 7:40 -0800, Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Why hinder a developer who prefer
2, 4, 6 or any other != 8 width?
I guess we could use tabs only
201 - 300 of 544 matches
Mail list logo
