Re: [patch -mm series] ia64 specific /dev/mem handlers

2005-02-23 Thread Jes Sorensen
> "Arjan" == Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Arjan> On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 17:30 -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> For userspace it's used by some of the MPI type apps in userland. Arjan> you got to be kidding. Why are these MPI apps accessing memory Arjan> that the kernel has mapped

Re: [patch -mm series] ia64 specific /dev/mem handlers

2005-02-23 Thread Arjan van de Ven
> However what happens if someone wants to share say some > texture ram between the kernel and a video card and that has to be > mapped uncached? Though up example here though. also that's surely supposed to be controlled by some kernel driver, which in turn can and should export it's own mmap in

Re: uninterruptible sleep lockups

2005-02-23 Thread Olaf Titz
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > The most recent one was yesterday: I had run lsusb in the morning and had no > problems, but at the end of the day I ran it again, and after outputting 3 > lines of data, it hung, stuck in D-state. So now I have this: > > [/home/user]$ ps aux|grep D > US

Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages

2005-02-23 Thread Guillaume Thouvenin
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 23:20 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Kaigai Kohei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The common agreement for the method of dealing with process aggregation > > has not been constructed yet, I understood. And, we will not able to > > integrate each process aggregation model

Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages

2005-02-23 Thread Andrew Morton
Guillaume Thouvenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > > > We really want to avoid doing such stuff in-kernel if at all possible, of > > course. > > > > Is it not possible to implement the fork/exec/exit notifications to > > userspace so that a daemon can track the process relationships and per

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm2] connector: Add a fork connector

2005-02-23 Thread Guillaume Thouvenin
Hello, This patch replaces the relay_fork module and it implements a fork connector in the kernel/fork.c:do_fork() routine. The connector sends information about parent PID and child PID over a netlink interface. It allows to several user space applications to be informed when a fork occurs in t

Re: [rft/update] r8169 changes in 2.6.x

2005-02-23 Thread Francois Romieu
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > There are already a bunch of r8169 patches in Jeff's tree. The combination > isn't pretty: [removed by parental advisory] I sent r8169-4{0/1/2/3/4}0 on netdev + Jeff the 22/02/2005. Jeff's netdev (thus your tree) already had the r8169-3xx changes. Jeff has a

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm2] connector: Add a fork connector

2005-02-23 Thread Andrew Morton
Guillaume Thouvenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > This patch replaces the relay_fork module and it implements a fork > connector in the kernel/fork.c:do_fork() routine. The connector sends > information about parent PID and child PID over a netlink interface. It > allows to several u

Re: [rft/update] r8169 changes in 2.6.x

2005-02-23 Thread Andrew Morton
Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - do something else until I verify the above and generate a dedicated >patchsets for your tree. That sounds great to me ;) 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 should be on kernel.org in an hour or so. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-

Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages

2005-02-23 Thread Guillaume Thouvenin
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 00:51 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > It's what I'm proposing. The problem is to be alerted when a new process > > is created in order to add it in the correct group of processes if the > > parent belongs to one (or several) groups. The notification can be done > > with the fo

Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages

2005-02-23 Thread Andrew Morton
Guillaume Thouvenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I will run benchmarks found at http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/ to see > how the fork connector impacts on the kernel. The lmbench fork microbenchmark would suffice. >All stuff that was previously done in kernel space and provided by the >

Re: [PATCH] Symlink /sys/class/block to /sys/block (fwd)

2005-02-23 Thread Malcolm Rowe
Greg KH writes: Following the discussion in [1], the attached patch creates /sys/class/block as a symlink to /sys/block. The patch applies to 2.6.11-rc4-bk7. Please cc: me on any replies - I'm not subscribed to the mailing list. Hm, your patch is linewrapped, and can't be applied :( Bah, and

Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages

2005-02-23 Thread Tim Schmielau
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > We really want to avoid doing such stuff in-kernel if at all possible, of > course. > > Is it not possible to implement the fork/exec/exit notifications to > userspace so that a daemon can track the process relationships and perform > aggregation based

Re: [patch -mm series] ia64 specific /dev/mem handlers

2005-02-23 Thread Jes Sorensen
> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> Jes Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> After applying the clue 2x4 to my head a couple of times, I came >> up with this patch. Hopefully it will work a bit better ;-) >> Andrew> I know it's repetitious, but it's nice to mai

Re: uninterruptible sleep lockups

2005-02-23 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 22:05 -0300, Horst von Brand wrote: > Chris Friesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: [...] > > Maybe I'm on crack, but would it not be technically possible to have all > > resource usage be tracked so that when a task tries to do something and > > hangs, eventually it gets cleaned

Q: Shared Memory vs. Ramdisk?

2005-02-23 Thread Byron Stanoszek
Hi all, I have an application on x86-64 that will require me sharing two memory segments upwards of 10+ GB each among several processes. Would it be better performance-wise to mmap in two files from a tmpfs filesystem, or, create two large ramdisks (/dev/ram0 & /dev/ram1) and mmap those in? I'm not

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm2] connector: Add a fork connector

2005-02-23 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:07:47 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guillaume Thouvenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > This patch replaces the relay_fork module and it implements a fork > > connector in the kernel/fork.c:do_fork() routine. The connector sends > > in

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm2] connector: Add a fork connector

2005-02-23 Thread Andrew Morton
Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:07:47 -0800 > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Guillaume Thouvenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > This patch replaces the relay_fork module and it implements a fork > > > connector in

Re: 2.6.11-rc4-mm1

2005-02-23 Thread Mathieu Segaud
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait derniÃrement que : > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/ > > > - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed > down a bit. > > - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone has p

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm2] connector: Add a fork connector

2005-02-23 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:58:06 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:07:47 -0800 > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Guillaume Thouvenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > >

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread David Howells
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It shouldn't be. If one read writer is active, another should be able to > come in, regardless of any pending writer trying to access it. At least > that's always been the rule for the rw-spinlocks _exactly_ for this > reaseon. But not with rw-semaph

Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages

2005-02-23 Thread Kaigai Kohei
Hi, Thanks for your comments. Andrew Morton wrote: >> Some process-aggregation model have own philosophy and implemantation, >> so it's hard to integrate. Thus, I think that common 'fork/exec/exit' event handling >> framework to implement any kinds of process-aggregation. > > > We really want to a

2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02 kernel BUG

2005-02-23 Thread Rui Nuno Capela
Hi, I'm back :) just shortly, to report an annoying kernel crash that sometimes I'm experiencing at boot time on my laptop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/UP), running 2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02 (PREEMPT_RT=y, config attached). This BUG is happening in some probabilistic fashion, like 1 on each 3 boots, renderi

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread David Howells
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is uglee. True. You could just wrap it up in inline functions and hide it in a header file as I suggested in the email I've just sent. > We really have this already, and it's called "current->preempt". It > handles any lock at all, and doesn't a

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread David Howells
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wrt this down_read/down_write/down_read deadlock: iirc, the reason why > down_write() takes precedence over down_read() is to avoid the permanent > writer starvation which would occur if there is heavy down_read() traffic. down_write() doesn't actually t

Re: 2.6.11-rc4-mm1

2005-02-23 Thread Jesper Juhl
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone has patches in here which are 2.6.11 > material, please tell me. I guess that depends on how you define 2.6.11 material at this point, but I have a few patches that I wrote in there, that I think are potential candidates due to them being fairly trivi

Slightly OT: We should move linux related channels off of FreeNode

2005-02-23 Thread Patrick McFarland
Today lilo (the FreeNode network owner) has decided to make one step away in a direction opposite of freedom, and banned all Tor users from the FreeNode network. Tor ( http://tor.eff.org ) is an open source anonymous gateway system. Many users who are not in the position to be able to use IRC o

Re: [PATCH] TCP-Hybla proposal

2005-02-23 Thread Angelo Dell'Aera
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:42:19 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Probably the best long term solution is to make the protocol choice > be a property of the destination cache [..] > The protocol choices are mutually exclusive, if you walk through the code > (or do experiments),

Re: Help tracking down problem --- endless loop in __find_get_block_slow

2005-02-23 Thread Thomas S. Iversen
> > dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/testfile count=N, N>6 It turns out N>6 is variable. But large enough and it will hang. Sugests some kind of race I am afraid. > > I get into an endless loop in __find_get_block_slow. > > The only way in which __find_get_block_slow() can loop is if something > wreck

Re: Help tracking down problem --- endless loop in __find_get_block_slow

2005-02-23 Thread Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas S. Iversen) wrote: > > > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/testfile count=N, N>6 > > It turns out N>6 is variable. But large enough and it will hang. Sugests > some kind of race I am afraid. > > > > I get into an endless loop in __find_get_block_slow. > > > > The only way in

Re: [NET]: Add sock_create_kern()

2005-02-23 Thread Park Lee
On 2004-05-08 at 22:00, James Morris wrote: > Under SELinux, and potentially other LSMs, we need > to be able to distinguish between user sockets and > kernel sockets. For SELinux specifically, kernel > sockets need to be specially labeled during > creation, then bypass access control checks (

Re: I wrote a kernel tool for monitoring / web page

2005-02-23 Thread sylvanino b
Hi, I wrote a kernel tool for my personnal usage which goal is to keep a record of recent task preemptions and interruptions that appears under linux. Either for debugging through KDB, or for monitoring/analyze with a graphics representation. as adviced, SourceForge project is now opened: http:

[PATCH] Determine SCx200 CB address at run-time

2005-02-23 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
The current SCx200 drivers use a fixed base address of 0x9000 for the Configuration Block, but some systems (at least the Soekris net4801) uses a base address of 0x6000. This patch first tries the fixed address then - if no configuration block could be found - tries the address written to the Confi

Re: Help tracking down problem --- endless loop in __find_get_block_slow

2005-02-23 Thread Thomas S. Iversen
> OK, so we're looking for the buffer_head for block 101 and the first > buffer_head which is attached to the page represents block 100. So the > next buffer_head _should_ represent block 101. Please print it out: Not quite the same, but simelar: Feb 23 14:50:24 localhost kernel: __find_get_blo

Re: 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 : IDE crazy numbers, hdb renumbered to hdq ?

2005-02-23 Thread Helge Hafting
This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3 when trying to mount /var. (I have two IDE disks on the same cable, and an IDE cdrom on another.) They are usually hda, hdb, and hdc. MAKEDEV hdq did not help. Looking at sysfs, it turns out that /dev/hdq1 is at major:3 minor:10

Re: OT: Why is usb data many times the cpu hog that firewire is?

2005-02-23 Thread Paulo Marques
Matt Mackall wrote: [...] JPEG data is DCT of 8x8 pixel chunks. If you can get at that, you can compare the DC terms of each chunk with minimal decoding. Various thumbnailers do this for speed already. I really doubt that this would work. It seems to me that you can have very different DC terms wi

mouse still losing sync and thus jumping around

2005-02-23 Thread Nils Kalchhauser
Hi! I still get the following messages and my mouse jumps around weirdly making work rather difficult regardless of which 2.6 kernel I use (tried 2.6.8, 2.6.9, 2.6.10, 2.6.11-rc2 with patch-see below, 2.6.11-rc4): psmouse.c: Mouse at isa0060/serio4/input0 lost synchronization, throwing 2 bytes

2.6.10-ck6

2005-02-23 Thread Con Kolivas
These are patches designed to improve system responsiveness. It is configurable to any workload but the default ck* patch is aimed at the desktop and ck*-server is available with more emphasis on serverspace. This is a maintenance release and is identical to 2.6.10-ck5 apart from using 2.6.10-a

Re: uninterruptible sleep lockups

2005-02-23 Thread linux-os
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Bodo Eggert wrote: linux-os <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You don't seem to understand. A process that's stuck in 'D' state shows a SEVERE error, usually with a hardware driver. Or a network filesystem mount to a no longer existing server or share. But that's a whole different pro

Re: [RFC] pdirops: vfs patch

2005-02-23 Thread Alex Tomas
> Jan Blunck (JB) writes: JB> Nope, d_alloc() is setting d_flags to DCACHE_UNHASHED. Therefore it is not found JB> by __d_lookup() until it is rehashed which is implicit done by ->lookup(). that means we can have two processes allocated dentry for same name. they'll call ->lookup() each ag

Re: 2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02 kernel BUG

2005-02-23 Thread Matthias-Christian Ott
Rui Nuno Capela wrote: Hi, I'm back :) just shortly, to report an annoying kernel crash that sometimes I'm experiencing at boot time on my laptop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/UP), running 2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02 (PREEMPT_RT=y, config attached). This BUG is happening in some probabilistic fashion, like 1 on

Re: mouse still losing sync and thus jumping around

2005-02-23 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:22:42 +0100, Nils Kalchhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I still get the following messages and my mouse jumps around weirdly > making work rather difficult regardless of which 2.6 kernel I use (tried > 2.6.8, 2.6.9, 2.6.10, 2.6.11-rc2 with patch-see below, 2.6.11-

Re: loading driver automatically & manually

2005-02-23 Thread Martin Hicks
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 06:34:54PM -0800, Anil Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to install RHEL 4, 2.6.9-5.EL. I have adaptec 39320 > controller, The install CD already has aic79xx driver in it. The > driver does NOT load for some reason. If I take the same aic79xx > driver source, Create an

BK-kernel-tools/shortlog update

2005-02-23 Thread Matthias Andree
Hello Linus, you can either use "bk receive" to patch with this mail, or you can Pull from: bk://krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/BK-kernel-tools or in cases of dire need, you can apply the patch below. BK: Parent repository is file://var/bitkeeper/BK-kernel-tools Patch description: [EMAIL PR

WORK WITH US

2005-02-23 Thread Bruce
DEAR SIR/MADAM, WE WILL BE VERY GLAD IF YOU CAN BE OUR REPRESENTATIVE IN YOUR COUNTRY AND EARN 10% OF EVERY PAYMENT MADE THROUGH YOU TO US.FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT US THROUGH EMAIL. THANKS Mr. rawlings CEO. __

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread Joe Korty
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 01:30:27PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > We really have this already, and it's called "current->preempt". It > handles any lock at all, and doesn't add yet another special case to all > the architectures. > > Just do > > repeat: > down_read(¤t->mm

accept() fails with EINTER

2005-02-23 Thread linux-os
Trying to run an old server with a new kernel. A connection fails with "interrupted system call" as soon as a client attempts to connect. A trap in the code to continue works, but subsequent send() and recv() calls fail in the same way. Anybody know how to mask that SIGIO (or whatever signal)? Sett

xfsdump broken with Kernel 2.6.11-rc4

2005-02-23 Thread Sven Geggus
Hi there, looks like xfsdumpis broken with recent 2.6.11-rc Kernels. 2.6.11-rc4 is the one I tried. Strange enough ist does seem to work _sometimes_, but it does not work most of the time. If it does not work I just get the following message: xfsdump: ERROR: /dev/sda2 does not identify a file s

Re: 2.6.10-as5

2005-02-23 Thread Paolo Ciarrocchi
Hi Andreas On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:08:40 -0500, Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Here's 2.6.10-as5. 2.6.10-as4 was never officially announced; it had > issues (note to self; test, *then* tag). Distributors should note that > there is an ABI/API change in this release, due to >

Freenode, Tor, Linux channels (Was: Slightly OT: We should move linux...)

2005-02-23 Thread Rob Levin
Patrick, Today lilo (the FreeNode network owner) has decided to make one step away in a direction opposite of freedom, and banned all Tor users from the FreeNode network. The actual PDPC policy on access to Freenode via the Electronic Frontier Foundation's Tor project is here: http://freenode.net

[PATCH 2.6.11-rc4-mm1] mips: fixed confliction types for pcibios_align_resource

2005-02-23 Thread Yoichi Yuasa
This patch fixes confliction types for pcibios_align_resource. CC arch/mips/pci/pci.o arch/mips/pci/pci.c:55: error: conflicting types for 'pcibios_align_resource' include/linux/pci.h:729: error: previous declaration of 'pcibios_align_resource' was here make[1]: *** [arch/mips/pci/pci.o] E

[PATCH 2.9.11-rc4-mm1] mips: fixed kernel code resource initialization errors

2005-02-23 Thread Yoichi Yuasa
This patch fixes the following errores. We need C99 struct initialization. CC arch/mips/kernel/setup.o arch/mips/kernel/setup.c:89: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a cast arch/mips/kernel/setup.c:89: error: initializer element is not computable at load time arch

BKCVS still updated?

2005-02-23 Thread Catalin Marinas
Hi, Does anyone know whether the BKCVS repository (rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.5) is still updated? The last ChangeSet,v revision I got is 1.26750 which was checked in more than a week ago. (Sorry if I missed some e-mails about a planned down-time) Thanks, Catalin - To

Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6: USB Storage hangs machine on bootup for ~2 minutes

2005-02-23 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Parag Warudkar wrote: > Alan, > See below for stack traces and also note that the stack traces are after I > modified usb_device_read to do down_interruptible instead of down. (kudzu > gets stuck regardless though.) Let me know if you want me to revert the > down_interrupti

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Joe Korty wrote: > > Perhaps this should be preempt_disable preempt_enable. No, the problem with preempt_disable/enable is that they go away if preemption is not enabled. So you really do have to do it by hand with the "inc_preempt_count". > Otherwise, a preempt att

Re: [PATCH] Re: AHCI oops

2005-02-23 Thread Brett Russ
Jeff Garzik wrote: Can you try this patch? If it fixes the oops, I'll forward upstream ASAP. Jeff, It fixes the oops (pasted below) for me; please do push it ASAP. thanks, BR xlated vfy cmd LBA 0x14f500 cnt 20 ahci_interrupt: int on port 2 ahci_host_intr: fatal int seen ahci_intr_error: port 2 irq_

USB Storage problem (usb hangs)

2005-02-23 Thread Sebastian Fabrycki
Hi. The device is: USB2.0 to IDE 3.5" hard disk enclosure. Producer: Seven. Part of /var/log/messages with USB debug enabled in kernel is attached to this email. Kernel: 2.6.9, 2.6.10 (i cant remember from which one is attached log). Distribution: Gentoo. I'm not subscribed to the list, pleas C

Re: USB Storage problem (usb hangs)

2005-02-23 Thread John Stoffel
Sebastian, Try upgrading to 2.6.11-rc2-mm4 or newer, I've had better luck with my USB/Firewire external case on there. Just make sure you don't turn on usb-storage logging, it's way too verbose for general use! John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread Olof Johansson
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:39:08AM +, David Howells wrote: > Alternately, you could just have do_page_fault() do: > > while (!down_read_trylock(¤t->mm->mmap_sem)) > continue; > > However, note that this can suffer from starvation due to a never ending flow > of mixed write

Re: mouse still losing sync and thus jumping around

2005-02-23 Thread Nils Kalchhauser
Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:22:42 +0100, Nils Kalchhauser There were 2 versions of the psmouse-resend patch, the first one was indeed producing worse results, the second one should work better. Could you please try grabbing the patch against 2.6.10 from here: http://www.geocities.

Re: 2.6.11-rc4-mm1

2005-02-23 Thread Robert Love
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 12:03 +0100, Mathieu Segaud wrote: > it is the latest Robert Love posted against -mm kernels, but in > inotify_ignore(): I posted an updated patch last Friday, which fixed this. Anyhow, this is the correct fix. Signed-off-by: Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks,

Re: 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 (VFS: Cannot open root device "301")

2005-02-23 Thread Steven Cole
Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/ - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed down a bit. I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box. For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.1

Re: uninterruptible sleep lockups

2005-02-23 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:31:03 +0100, Olaf Titz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > > The most recent one was yesterday: I had run lsusb in the morning and had no > > problems, but at the end of the day I ran it again, and after outputting 3 > > lines of data, it

Re: uninterruptible sleep lockups

2005-02-23 Thread Parag Warudkar
I have recently run into similar issue involving processes stuck in D state - involves khubd and usb-storage. This happens with 2.6.11-rc4. Check lkml for subject Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6: USB Storage hangs mac.. Parag > On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:31:03 +0100, Olaf Titz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: the famous Tyan S2885 PCI IDE problem, additional experiences [resolved]

2005-02-23 Thread Billy Stewart
Dap, I too have the same problem in relation to the IAL completion errors and have upgraded from 2.6.9 to 2.6.11. But now I am unable to compile the openbuild drivers for the highpoint 1820a raid controllers. May I ask how you successfully comiled the drivers to work with 2.6.11? My setup: Ty

Re: 2.6.11-rc4-mm1

2005-02-23 Thread Vincent Vanackere
I'm getting several modules with undefined symbols : Kernel: arch/i386/boot/bzImage is ready Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST *** Warning: "match_octal" [fs/udf/udf.ko] undefined! *** Warning: "match_token" [fs/udf/udf.ko] undefined! *** Warning: "match_int" [fs/udf/udf.ko] undefined! *** Wa

Re: [darcs-users] Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

2005-02-23 Thread Andreas Gruenbacher
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 20:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > CVS was pretty good at keeping files sane, but I'll go for a solution that > completely sidesteps said problem any day. One way to get the benefits of both worlds would be to keep an additional history of changes (in whatever form) that allow

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread Olof Johansson
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:54:06AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Otherwise, a preempt attempt in get_user would not be seen > > until some future preempt_enable was executed. > > True. I guess we should have a "preempt_check_resched()" there too. That's > what "kunmap_atomic()" does too (whic

Re: OT: Why is usb data many times the cpu hog that firewire is?

2005-02-23 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Paulo Marques wrote: > Matt Mackall wrote: > > [...] > > JPEG data is DCT of 8x8 pixel chunks. If you can get at that, you can > > compare the DC terms of each chunk with minimal decoding. Various > > thumbnailers do this for speed already. > > I really doubt that this would w

2.6.11-rc4-mm1 and dpt_i2o Adaptec I2O RAID controller

2005-02-23 Thread sebastian.faerber
Hi all, i'm trying to get an Adaptec 2015S Zero Channel Raid Controller up and running in a very new Asus Mainboard (NCL-DS) with Dual Xeons. I already tried kernel 2.4.29 and plain 2.6.10 but both just lock up when loading the dpt_i2o driver. With 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 i could gather the following out

[ANNOUNCE] yaird 0.0.4, a mkinitrd based on hotplug concepts

2005-02-23 Thread Erik van Konijnenburg
Version 0.0.4 of yaird is now available at: http://www.xs4all.nl/~ekonijn/yaird/yaird-0.0.4.tar.gz Yaird is a perl rewrite of mkinitrd. It aims to reliably identify the necessary modules by using the same algorithms as hotplug, and comes with a template system to to tune the tool for diff

Ignored return value of __clear_user in fs/binfmt_elf.c?

2005-02-23 Thread Horst von Brand
Machine is sparc64, bk of today, gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3 (Aurora Corona). First 2.6 I try to build here, so it might be something known. Build fails due to -Werror with: include/asm/uaccess.h: In function `load_elf_binary': arch/sparc64/kernel/../../../fs/binfmt_elf.c:811: warning: ignoring return value

Re: [PATCH] TCP-Hybla proposal

2005-02-23 Thread Daniele Lacamera
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 05:00, Matt Mackall wrote: > It's disappointing that this paper appears to be available only > through subscription sources. If I'm mistaken, please post a URL. > The authors are making a webpage with info and documentation. I suppose that article you are referring

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 11:10 -0600, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:54:06AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Otherwise, a preempt attempt in get_user would not be seen > > > until some future preempt_enable was executed. > > > > True. I guess we should have a "preempt_check_

Re: mouse still losing sync and thus jumping around

2005-02-23 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:29:49 +0100, Nils Kalchhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:22:42 +0100, Nils Kalchhauser > > There were 2 versions of the psmouse-resend patch, the first one was > > indeed producing worse results, the second one should work b

More latency regressions with 2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02

2005-02-23 Thread Lee Revell
Ingo, Did something change recently in the VM that made copy_pte_range and clear_page_range a lot more expensive? I noticed a reference in the "Page Table Iterators" thread to excessive overhead introduced by aggressive page freeing. That sure looks like what is going on in trace2. trace1 and t

v2.4 megaraid2 update Re: [PATCH] Prevent NMI oopser

2005-02-23 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
Hi, As the megaraid2 maintainers dont seem to care about v2.4 mainline at all, completly ignoring my requests to fix the NMI oopser bug for several months, I'm applying the RHEL3 update + inline reordering, which should do it. At this point I'm quite sure they wont answer this message eithe

Re: [PATCH] i2c.h: Fix another gcc 4.0 compile failure

2005-02-23 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 07:40:24AM -0800, Mickey Stein wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > >On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 08:58:48AM -0800, Mickey Stein wrote: > > > > > >>From: Mickey Stein > >>Versions: linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk7, gcc4 (GCC) 4.0.0 20050217 (latest fc > >>rawhide from 19Feb DL) > >> > >>gcc4 cvs

Re: Bootsplash for 2.6.11-rc4

2005-02-23 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 02:15:05PM +0100, Michal Januszewski wrote: > On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 03:03:26PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > Pavel, I agree with Michal, take a look at this version of the code > > instead of the version that you posted. It's a _whole_ lot more sane, > > and possibly even

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread Jamie Lokier
Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:54:06AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Otherwise, a preempt attempt in get_user would not be seen > > > until some future preempt_enable was executed. > > > > True. I guess we should have a "preempt_check_resched()" there too. That's > > w

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > I suggest putting it into futex.c, and make it an inline function > which takes "u32 __user *". Agreed, except we've traditionally just made it "int __user *". Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k

[PATCH] Removes unnecessary "if" statement from drivers/block/z2ram.c

2005-02-23 Thread Telemaque Ndizihiwe
This Patch removes unnecessary "if" statement from a function without implementation (in kernel 2.6.x and 2.4.x), the function returns "0" with or without the "if" statement. Signed-off-by: Telemaque Ndizihiwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.10/drivers/block/z2ram.c.orig2005-02-23 18:02:5

[PATCH] Replaces (2 * HZ) with DATA_TIMEOUT in /drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c

2005-02-23 Thread Telemaque Ndizihiwe
This Patch replaces "(2 * HZ)" with "DATA_TIMEOUT" which is defined as #define DATA_TIMEOUT (2 * HZ) in /drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c in kernel 2.6.10. Signed-off-by: Telemaque Ndizihiwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.10/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c.orig2005-02-20 12:44:22.235267848 + +

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread Olof Johansson
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 06:22:04PM +, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:54:06AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > Otherwise, a preempt attempt in get_user would not be seen > > > > until some future preempt_enable was executed. > > > > > > True.

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread David Howells
Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alternately, you could just have do_page_fault() do: > > > > while (!down_read_trylock(¤t->mm->mmap_sem)) > > continue; > > > > However, note that this can suffer from starvation due to a never ending > > flow of mixed write-locks and

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread Jamie Lokier
Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I suggest putting it into futex.c, and make it an inline function > > which takes "u32 __user *". > > Agreed, except we've traditionally just made it "int __user *". The type signatures in futex.c are a bit mixed up - most places say "int __user *" but sys_futex() says "

Re: [PATCH] Replaces (2 * HZ) with DATA_TIMEOUT in /drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c

2005-02-23 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Telemaque Ndizihiwe wrote: > > This Patch replaces "(2 * HZ)" with "DATA_TIMEOUT" which is defined as > #define DATA_TIMEOUT (2 * HZ) > in /drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c in kernel 2.6.10. Your patches are white-space damaged due to linewrap (and possibly other issues, but

Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages

2005-02-23 Thread Jay Lan
Guillaume Thouvenin wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 23:20 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Kaigai Kohei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The common agreement for the method of dealing with process aggregation has not been constructed yet, I understood. And, we will not able to integrate each process aggregation

Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

2005-02-23 Thread Bill Davidsen
d.c wrote: El Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:34:23 -0500 (EST), "Sean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: BK already feeds patches out at the head, surely if it's as powerful as you think, it could feed a free SCM too for your non-bk friends in the community. Who cares, really? 1) Linux was never supposed to hav

Re: More latency regressions with 2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02

2005-02-23 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > > Did something change recently in the VM that made copy_pte_range and > clear_page_range a lot more expensive? I noticed a reference in the > "Page Table Iterators" thread to excessive overhead introduced by > aggressive page freeing. That sure looks lik

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Futex mmap_sem deadlock

2005-02-23 Thread Olof Johansson
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 06:49:46PM +, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > I suggest putting it into futex.c, and make it an inline function > > > which takes "u32 __user *". > > > > Agreed, except we've traditionally just made it "int __user *". > > The type signatures in futex.

Re: intel8x0: no sound in 2.6.11 rc3 & 4 (fine with 2.6.10)

2005-02-23 Thread Bill Davidsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello I have read a post in lkml.org that states that the problem experienced in rc3 has gone (1). That is not the case for me. My audio device is :00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 01)

Re: Call for help: list of machines with working S3

2005-02-23 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:11:05 +0100, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > Table of known working systems: > > Model hack (or "how to do it") > -- > IBM TP R32 / Type 2658-MMG no

Linux 2.4.30-pre2

2005-02-23 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
Hi, Here goes the second pre of v2.4.30. It contains a bunch of important networking fixes, most noticeably the brlocks rework. Plus USB fixes, megaraid2 driver update, JFS update, amongst others. Read the changelog for detailed information Summary of changes from v2.4.30-pre1 to v2.4.30-pre2

Re: [PATCH] Reserve only needed regions for PC timers on i386 and x86_64

2005-02-23 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:06:18PM +0100, Charles-Edouard Ruault wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >On Llu, 2005-02-07 at 09:29, Charles-Edouard Ruault wrote: > >>- Why is the generic timer using this address ? isn't it reserving a too > >>wide portion of IO ports ? Should it be modified for this board

Re: More latency regressions with 2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02

2005-02-23 Thread Lee Revell
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 19:16 +, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > > > > Did something change recently in the VM that made copy_pte_range and > > clear_page_range a lot more expensive? I noticed a reference in the > > "Page Table Iterators" thread to excessive overh

Re: [Patch 6/6] Bind Mount Extensions 0.06

2005-02-23 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:58:45AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > ty den 22.02.2005 Klokka 13:13 (+0100) skreiv Herbert Poetzl: > > > diff -NurpP --minimal > > linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c > > > > linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-c

Re: More latency regressions with 2.6.11-rc4-RT-V0.7.39-02

2005-02-23 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 19:16 +, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > > I'm just about to test this patch below: please give it a try: thanks... I'm very sorry, there's two things wrong with that version: _must_ increment addr before breaking out, and better to che

[BK PATCHES] 2.6.x libata fixes (mostly)

2005-02-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
This BK push includes additional hardware support, but that's only because it's (a) obviously low impact and (b) it was in the queue. Far more important are: 1) API additions, to fix a severe bug: advanced drivers such as AHCI were directly bitbanging --non-existent-- PCI IDE registers, causing

Re: Help tracking down problem --- endless loop in __find_get_block_slow

2005-02-23 Thread Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas S. Iversen) wrote: > > > OK, so we're looking for the buffer_head for block 101 and the first > > buffer_head which is attached to the page represents block 100. So the > > next buffer_head _should_ represent block 101. Please print it out: > > Not quite the same, but s

  1   2   3   4   >