Kingsley Cheung writes:
>
> To solve the problem I applied a patch similar to the one you posted
> back in July and it fixed the problem. Could we consider putting this
> patch into relayfs? Its similar to the one posted in July 2004, except
> it also moves clear_readers() before INIT_WORK i
Hello, Bartlomiej.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[ against ide-dev-2.6 tree, boot tested on LBA48 drive ]
This small patch fixes unneeded writes/reads to LBA48 taskfile registers
on LBA48 capable disks for following cases:
* Power Management requests
(WIN_FLUSH_CACHE[_EXT], WIN_STANDBYNOW1, WI
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:42:27PM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> Kingsley Cheung writes:
> >
> > To solve the problem I applied a patch similar to the one you posted
> > back in July and it fixed the problem. Could we consider putting this
> > patch into relayfs? Its similar to the one posted i
On Sunday 06 February 2005 22:41, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 02:55 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Rusty,
> >
> > I have converted serio bus to use ID matching and changed serio drivers
> > to use MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE. Now that Vojtech pulled the changes into his
> > tree it
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:55:00PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> Hmm, wouldn't it be nice if they put spell checker in GCC? ;)
Isn't the resulting beast called "emacs"?
--
Ryan Anderson
sometimes Pug Majere
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
Hello,
I have written one /proc file creation kernel
module. This module creates /proc/file and defied
operations on it. Also i have written user program
that will read & write to /proc files from user space.
Now what i want is to use same bufproc_read &
bufproc_write functions defined in
I was looking at some of the code we generate, and happened to notice that
we have this strange situation where the x86 "get_user()" macros generate
out-of-line code to do all the address verification etc, but the
"put_user()" ones do not, and do everything inline.
I also noticed that (probabl
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 22:17 -0800, linux lover wrote:
> Hello,
> I have written one /proc file creation kernel
> module. This module creates /proc/file and defied
> operations on it. Also i have written user program
> that will read & write to /proc files from user space.
> Now what i want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2005 09:36 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:21:08AM +0100, Pozsar Balazs wrote:
>
>>On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 07:06:59AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:33:43AM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote:
>>
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Sunday 06 February 2005 08:12, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:24:39AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:52:15 -0600, David Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Currently a blockin
Andi Kleen wrote:
> It's dependent on the architecture already. I would like to enable
> it on i386/x86-64 because the kernel command line is often used
> to pass parameters to installers, and having a small limit there
> can be awkward.
Something to keep in mind when extending the command line is
Hello,
I just want to report a lockup on my 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 machine.
I was working on it via ssh and suddenly the machine stopped
responding. When, the next day I came up to the console
it was printing over and over this oops.
In the logs I could find the oops. I am posting it inline here
along w
Itsuro Oda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So I believe the fix needs to be to enable apics before we calibrate
> > the delay timer. I'm not certain off the top of my head what that
> > patch will look like but it should not be fundamentally hard.
> > With that code in place we also don't need
[ against ide-dev-2.6 tree, boot tested on LBA48 drive ]
This small patch fixes unneeded writes/reads to LBA48 taskfile registers
on LBA48 capable disks for following cases:
* Power Management requests
(WIN_FLUSH_CACHE[_EXT], WIN_STANDBYNOW1, WIN_IDLEIMMEDIATE commands)
* special commands (WIN
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
I have not fully reviewed it yet but I've noticed two things...
@@ -648,11 +648,11 @@ u8 eighty_ninty_three (ide_drive_t *driv
EXPORT_SYMBOL(eighty_ninty_three);
-int ide_ata66_check (ide_drive_t *drive, ide_task_t *args)
+int ide_ata66_check(ide_drive_t *drive, ta
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 11:15:56 +0900 (KST), Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- int err = 0;
- u8 args[7], *argbuf = args;
- int argsize = 7;
+ u8 args[7];
+ ide_task_t task;
+ task_ioreg_t *regs = task.tfRegister;
u8 *regs ple
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
I put some more thought into this change... details below...
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 11:15:56 +0900 (KST), Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
@@ -705,24 +705,17 @@ static int idedisk_issue_flush(request_q
{
ide_drive_t *drive = q->queuedata;
struct requ
This patch makes a needlessly global function static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 15 Nov 2004
--- linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5-full/drivers/scsi/sym53c416.c.old 2004-11-14
01:30:23.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5-full/drivers/scsi/
This patch makes a needlessly global variable static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 15 Nov 2004
--- linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5-full/drivers/scsi/ultrastor.c.old 2004-11-14
01:31:07.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm5-full/drivers/scsi/
201 - 219 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
