I ask this (tounge in cheek) becouse some of the comments I have seen this
month seem so out of place.
first we had the 'this portion of the kernel is not subject to change by
anyone but me' post
now we have the 'code from this company or anyone working there is not
acceptable (now matter how we
Hi,
While testing my module I've meet the following Oops
kernel BUG at slab.c:1095!
invalid operand:
CPU:0
EIP:0010:[]
EFLAGS: 00010282
eax: 001b ebx: c1227570 ecx: c728c000 edx: c02575a4
esi: c1227570 edi: 0007 abp: c026fe0c esp: c026fd84
ds: 0018 es: 0018 s
Hi Alan,
ramfs accounting does not get notified when a clean page gets dropped
from the inode.
Also tmpfs should use the new function to do accurate accounting. Else
the cached field in -ac will get spurious negative values.
The following patch fixes both.
Greetings
Christoph
Robert Kleemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a client server program that opens a tcp connection between two
> machines. Everything is fine until a certain type of data is sent
> across the socket at which point the client refuses to ACK and the
> server continues to resend the packets t
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I suppect that there is bug in both kernel 2.2.19 and 2.4.5.
> The situation is as follow.
>
> One server socket created and listening, blocking on select(),
> once a client connect to that port, there is another thread in server
> side issues a close()
Michal Margula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello!
>
> My friend told me to noticed you about problems I had with 2.4.x line of
> kernels. I started up from 2.4.3. Under heavy load I was getting
> messages from telnet, ping, nmap "No buffer space available". Strace
> told me it was error marked
Dear Mr. Craig Lyons,
> Hello,
>
> My name is Craig Lyons and I am the marketing manager at Promise Technology.
> We have a question and are hoping you can point us in the right direction.
> In the 2.4 kernel there is support for some of our products (Ultra 66, Ultra
> 100, etc.). As you may or
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can also use the LDT to point to thread-specific segments. IMHO this
> is much better than the stack trick used by linuxthreads. The problem
Modern LinuxThreads (glibc 2.2) also uses modify_ldt for thread local data
(much to the pain of the IA64 and x
Hi,
when I try my module with a ping -f , it immediately freez, so I'd like to
know
what is the best flag for kmalloc when I send a packet and I have to copy
it
in a new buffer (gfp_kernel | gfp_atomic ?)
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the bo
Hi!
> > Let me guess: vesafb?
> I am running vesafb, yes...
>
> > If problem goes away when you stop using framebuffer
> > (i.e. go X), then
> > it is known.
> but the problem happens in X as well :)
So that's different problem.
> > You are lucky. My machine is able to loose 2 minutes
> > fro
Hi!
> I just had one of the "3com Etherlink 10/100 PCI NIC with 3XP processor"
> float accross my desk, I was wondering how much the linux kernel uses the
> 3xp processor for its encryption offloading and such. According to the
> hype it does DES without using the CPU, does linux take advantage
Hi!
> The problem is that there are comparisons of pointers to task_struct when
> deciding if the task is alive. If one task dies and other one starts, it is
> possible (is it?) that the task structure of the newly created task resides
> at the very address where was the dead one's, so comparing
I have the sound blaster 16 card on one of my athlon (on PIII i have
es1731), that has one isa slot on its MB.
It works well, but i do not use isapnp nor any pnp support is enabled
inside of the kernel.
running 2.4.5/2.4.6-pre2
Luigi
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Colonel wrote:
> From: Colonel <[EMAIL
Hi!
> I am a summer student implementing a multi-threaded version of a very
> popular bioinformatics tool. So far it compiles and runs without problems
> (as far as I can tell ;) on Linux 2.2.x, Sun Solaris, SGI IRIX and Compaq
> OSF/1 running on Alpha. I have ran a lot of timing tests compared t
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Ben Greear wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
> >
> > I have scripts that ssh into large numbers of boxes, which are sometimes
> > down. The timeout for figuring out the box is down is over an hour. This is
> > just insane.
> >
> > Telnet and ftp behave similarly, or at least tt
Hello!
I got plenty of replies. Thanks. Playing with
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/default/gc_thresh{2,3} helped. The funny thing
is that there are no more ENOBUFS problems - I am guessing that in
2.2.19 buffer of TCP is bigger than in 2.4.x, or something...
People asked me about more details of oops
Hi,
Here is the patch again for the benefit of those who are allergic to
opening enclosures.
I believe it will only take about 30 seconds of "real thinking" for those
familiar with dev.c to make
an evaluation of the patch.
Those already familiar with the bug can skip this paragraph,
The bug fi
Hi great David;
Normally I would have just ignored your mail but one of your so great
points seems to fit with one of my recent post (perhaps you thought about
others) and I would like to give you my opinion about it.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:11:33 David Lang wrote:
> now we have the 'code from th
Hi!
Somebody is trying to use a DVD RAM in linux,
using a DVD ROM drive ( that can read DVD RAM ).
Here are some info :
zen:/usr/src/linux# fdisk -l /dev/hdd
Disk /dev/hdd: 1 heads, 4875840 sectors, 1 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 681536 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks
> I got just the YUV code from Gatos, and a few months ago it took less than
> an hour to merge just that part (and most of that was compiling and
> testing).
Me too. After some days playing with it it seems that the Rage Mobility
Card (from the Vaio Picturebook C1VE <- that's where we started th
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I just had one of the "3com Etherlink 10/100 PCI NIC with 3XP processor"
> > float accross my desk, I was wondering how much the linux kernel uses the
> > 3xp processor for its encryption offloading and such. According to the
> > hype it does
[this time with l-k cc]
Mark Hayden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * The Linux networking stack requires all skbuff buffers to be
> contiguous. As far as I can tell, this makes it impossible to
> write high-bandwidth UDP applications on Linux. For instance, the
> kernel will drop a fragm
Hi all,
attached are patches to add (missing) error checking and proper error code returning
in case of request_region(), request_irq and misc_register() fauilures.
Drivers affected: atixlmouse.c, logibusmouse.c, msbusmouse.c, pc110pad.c.
Best regards.
P.S. Also check_region() calls removed fr
From: Colonel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(message from Luigi Genoni on Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:32:35 +0200 (CEST))
Subject: Re: your mail
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 200
Hi,
added misc_register() return value checking and removed panic() in case of
kmalloc failure (IMHO it's possible to live without PS/2 mouse :)
Best regards.
--
Andrey Panin| Embedded systems software engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| PGP key: http://www.orbita1.ru/~pazke/Andre
Hi,
I have upgraded from 2.4.2 to 2.4.5 and noticed a difference between the
output of fstat() for pipes using the following testprogram:
#include
#include
#include
#include
main()
{
FILE *f;
struct stat buf;
int retval;
f = popen("echo -n test", "r");
retval
Hello
I should add 1 giga of RAM to a machine which already has 1 giga. I know
I will have to configure bigmem support in the kernel (2.2.19). I would
like to know if this option is considered really stable and tested or I
can expect some problems, because this is a heavy loaded critical server
a
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 01:07:11PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> due to the nature of the problem (a pairwise mutual alignment of n
> sequences results in mx. n^2 alignments which can each be done in a
> separate thread), I need to create and destroy the threads frequently.
>
> I am not reall
Hi there,
on my Elan410 based System it is very easy to change the CPU clock speed by
means od two outb commands.
I was wondering, if it does some harm to the Kernel if the CPU is
reprogrammed using a different CPU clock speed, while the system is up and
running.
If so, is there a possibility t
Hi
this happens every time during boot on 2.4.6-pre2
ksymoops 2.3.7 on i586 2.4.6-pre1. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-L (specified)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.6-pre1/ (default)
-m P200-2.4.6-pre2/System.map (specified)
No modules in ksyms, skipping obj
I'm not sure of the exact specs. Check out the Xfree CVS. Or ask on
the [EMAIL PROTECTED] ML.
Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 12 Jun, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> > Also there is some work on a new XvMC interface that would allow for
> > extended DVD acceleration.
>
> Extended DVD accelera
Sven Geggus wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> on my Elan410 based System it is very easy to change the CPU clock speed by
> means od two outb commands.
>
> I was wondering, if it does some harm to the Kernel if the CPU is
> reprogrammed using a different CPU clock speed, while the system is up and
> run
I actually heard from one of the xfree developers last night that the
merge of the the YUV stuff at least is in progress. As I recall I think
XvMC was for general media controls, but I could be wrong, it's been a
while.
Alex
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
On 20010613 Kurt Garloff wrote:
>
> What I do in my numerics code to avoid this problem, is to create all the
> threads (as many as there are CPUs) on program startup and have then wait
> (block) for a condition. As soon as there's something to to, variables for
>
Hi,
I have a brand new Dell Inspiron 8000, laptop. It can run in 700 MHz or
850 MHz. The manual says that the machine/BIOS switches speed dependent on
CPU load. I have not installed Linux yet, but it works with Win2000.
It is also possible to force the BIOS to one speed if the OS don't like
sp
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Alok K. Dhir wrote:
> Are these page_launder improvements included in 2.4.6-pre3?
Please, don't send whole patches to the list just to ask a
question like this. But, since you sent the patch anyway,
why not read patch-2.4.6-pre3 to see if it's there?
Rik
--
Virtual memory
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Magnus Sandberg wrote:
> I have a brand new Dell Inspiron 8000, laptop. It can run in 700 MHz or
> 850 MHz. The manual says that the machine/BIOS switches speed dependent on
> CPU load. I have not installed Linux yet, but it works with Win2000.
Intel Speedstep iirc. My Vaio
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Matthias Papesch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering what kind of filesystem do you exactly need on the cluster
> nodes?
>
> The way I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong) is, that MOSIX starts
> the process on the local node and then migrates the contents of the
> memory. So i
I cannot get the new kernel I built to boot completely.
It hangs after printing this message to screen.
NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP For Linux 4.0
It also appears it cannot mount the file system.
How do I get log messages for complete and incomplete sessions?
Thanks
Godwin
If some fields
"J . A . Magallon" wrote:
>
> On 20010613 Kurt Garloff wrote:
> >
> > What I do in my numerics code to avoid this problem, is to create all the
> > threads (as many as there are CPUs) on program startup and have then wait
> > (block) for a condition. As so
My notebook, an old Pentium/150-based Dell Latitude, uses the CMD643
IDE controller. Is this effectively the same part as the CMD640 that
is warned about in the kernel doc? I'm trying to decide if the CMD640
bugfix is required in the v2.4.5 kernel options.
Thanks.
-
ide:
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> Keith Owens writes:
> > #define my_symbol my_symbol_versioned
> > extern void my_symbol(void);
> >
> > void foo(void) { __asm__("call %0" : : "i" (my_symbol)); }
> >
> > # gcc -o x x.c
> > /tmp/cclWXduj.s: Assembler messages:
> > /tmp/cclWXduj.s:12: Erro
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:44:40PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Use %c0. *Note Output Templates and Operand Substitution: (gcc)Output
> Template.
Oh great! I can get rid of some more crap from the ARM tree!
Thanks.
--
Russell King ([EMAIL PROTECTED])The developer of ARM Linu
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 07:21:41AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> I can't believe there is no reliable way to get rid of that
> pesky "$" gcc is adding to the symbol. Oh well...
GCC on ARM does a similar thing - all constants in the assembler are
prefixed with '#' or '@'. Using the 'i' constra
> "Felix" == Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Felix> I have been told that I should send a diff rather than complain
Felix> and expect others to make a diff. Oops ,)
Felix> So attached is a diff.
A diff against glibc sent to the glibc list would be a lot more
useful.
Felix> O
Solaris has pset_create() and pset_bind() where you can bind LWPs to
specific processors, but I doubt this works on anything else
Best regards,
Ognen
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Philips wrote:
> BTW.
> Question was poping in my mind and finally got negative answer by my mind ;-)
>
>
On Wednesday 13 June 2001 05:40, Luigi Genoni wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Ben Greear wrote:
> > You can tune things by setting the tcp-timeout probably..I don't
> > know exactly where to set this..
>
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fin_timeout
>
> default is 60.
Never got that far. My problem was ac
Hi,
Is it possible to build an SMP module on a machine running a UP kernel
(or vice versa)? We of course get unresolved symbols during module load
due to the smp prefix on the ksyms, and haven't seen how to get around
it. (Defining __SMP__ does not cut it, though I believe this used to
work a whi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 01:17:49PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> Folks, I believe I have a reproducible test case which corrupts data in
> 2.4.5.
Why don't you send the test case to the list? I would love to try it
out and it would be a good addition to LTP.
--
Nate Straz
Hi all!
I currently try to debug why the sisfb driver crashes my machine. (SIS 630
based laptop - linux-2.4.5-ac13).
On my serial-console I get:
[...]
sisfb: framebuffer at 0xe000, mapped to 0xcb80, size 16384k
sisfb: MMIO at 0xefce, mapped to 0xcc801000, size 128k
sisfb: encountered
Mark Mokryn wrote:
> Is it possible to build an SMP module on a machine running a UP kernel
> (or vice versa)? We of course get unresolved symbols during module load
> due to the smp prefix on the ksyms, and haven't seen how to get around
> it. (Defining __SMP__ does not cut it, though I believe t
The IESG approved ECN as a proposed standard on the 12th of June.
That means as of now, anyone blocking ECN bits is considered to be
blaspheming.
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordom
Hi,
I have a 3COM 3C905B ethernet card that has been hit by a power outage for
aprox. 0.5 sec. Now, the kernel does not recongnize the card
anymore. When I do lspci, I see 3COM Ethernet controller, type unknown
0xff (rev 3x). The bios reports the card as an ethernet card at system
boot-up.
On Wednesday 13 June 2001 03:06, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> No I would not take their code and apply it.
> I might not even want to look at it.
Well, you're maintainer and I'm obviously not, but it's nice to hear you've
kept an open mind on this issue. :)
> All I want is the API rules to the signat
Anyway, Hi All,
I was wondering if there are any other folks out there like me who
have the 256 PCI bus limit looking at them straight in the face? If so,
it'd be nice to collaborate and come up with a more general solution
that would hopefully work towards the greater good.
I live in pp
On 13 Jun 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
> The packet likely doesn't fit into the socket buffer and is silently
> dropped. The TCP stack doesn't force an ACK in this case, but it
> probably should, although it wouldn't solve the deadlock. The deadlock
> will be only solved if the local application reads
Rafael Herrera wrote:
>
> Mark Mokryn wrote:
> > Is it possible to build an SMP module on a machine running a UP kernel
> > (or vice versa)? We of course get unresolved symbols during module load
> > due to the smp prefix on the ksyms, and haven't seen how to get around
> > it. (Defining __SMP__
> I currently try to debug why the sisfb driver crashes my machine. (SIS 630
> based laptop - linux-2.4.5-ac13).
You can do one of two things. Post both System.map and the complete oops
or you can run ksymoops on the oops. I can find the problem then. Thanks.
> On my serial-console I get:
> [..
I've been running 2.4.5 on my new Dell I8000 without too many
problems. Last night I built -ac13 (on my porch) and booted it
without incident. Later, going inside and re-connecting the AC I
notice that the thing's hung. I play around a bit and discover that
the act of plugging or unplugging th
Tom Gall writes:
> I was wondering if there are any other folks out there like me who
> have the 256 PCI bus limit looking at them straight in the face?
I might. The need to reserve bus numbers for hot-plug looks like
a quick way to waste all 256 bus numbers.
> each PHB has an
> additional id
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:06:40PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote:
> This may sound like flamebait, but its not. Linux threads are basically
> just processes that share the same address space. Their performance is
> measurably worse than it is on most commercial Unixes and FreeBSD.
Thread creation may be
Is there any filesystem in Linux that uses user scripts/executables to
implement the various function calls? What I'm thinking of is something
along the lines of a file system module that, when it receives a call
from VFS, passes the information out to a user-mode daemon which could
then run scri
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Rob Landley wrote:
> Well, you're maintainer and I'm obviously not, but it's nice to hear you've
> kept an open mind on this issue. :)
I have seen one version and I got physically sick.
> > All I want is the API rules to the signatures and we have them now.
> >
> > We do n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Is there any filesystem in Linux that uses user scripts/executables to
> implement the various function calls?
http://uservfs.sourceforge.net
Also, have a look at the hostfs filesystem in UML. It implements a virtual
filesystem which provides access to the host filesy
"Albert D. Cahalan" wrote:
>
> Tom Gall writes:
>
> > I was wondering if there are any other folks out there like me who
> > have the 256 PCI bus limit looking at them straight in the face?
>
> I might. The need to reserve bus numbers for hot-plug looks like
> a quick way to waste all 256 bus
Hi folks!
After seeing the Oops below (and rebooting), I looked into /proc/ksyms
(because ksymoops complained about mismatches), and I could not find
system_call, do_page_fault, etc. Shouldn't they be there? When doing
ksymoops with /proc/ksyms I found recursive calling of do_brk, which
for sure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Russ Lewis) writes:
> Is there any filesystem in Linux that uses user scripts/executables to
> implement the various function calls? What I'm thinking of is something
It has been done before.
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/ALPHA/userfs/userfs.lsm describes a
patch/kernel m
>I got that response too. When I pressed kernel people for details it turns
>out that they think having hundreds of runnable threads/processes (mostly
>the same thing under Linux) is wasteful. The scheduler is just not
optimised
>for that.
Try out the http://lse.sourceforge.net/scheduling patc
On Tuesday, 12 June 2001, at 18:42:45 -0700,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> User-noticeable things: if you are tired of not being able to NFS-export
> your reiserfs tree, this should make you happy.
>
> VM tuning has also happened, with Rik van Riel, Mike Galbraith, Marcelo
> Tosatti and Andrew Mort
Hi,
I have one doubt.
There is a list of the devices(net_device{} structures) maintained in kernel which
has all the interfaces initialised by that time. This list is refrenced by dev_base
variable.
I need following info
1) does kernel maintain a global variable which keeps the count
Hi All,
I have been using the 2.4.x kernels since the 2.4.0-test days on my Dell 5000e
laptop with 320MB of RAM and have experienced first hand many of the problems
other users have reported with the VM system in 2.4. Most of these problems
have been only minor anoyances and I have continued tes
Hello,
The Ethernet bonding module is useless without ifenslave.c. I'm making a Debian
package for it, and I have tried to find the "offical" distribution of this
small program. I could not find an authorative source, instead a lot of copies
and patched versions are scattered around the Internet
Em Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 12:14:18PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have one doubt.
>
> There is a list of the devices(net_device{} structures) maintained in kernel which
>has all the interfaces initialised by that time. This list is refrenced by dev_base
>variable.
>
>
MEMORY Spectek or Micron lifetime warranty (Min.Qty. Less 100)
$ 8.95 32 MB 168pins PC-100
$ 12.75 64 MB 168pins PC-100/PC-133
$ 21.50 128 MB 168pins PC-100/PC-133
$ 41.50 256 MB 168pins PC-100/PC-133
Hard Drive (Min.Qty. Less 50)
$ 63.50 Har
Quoting Russ Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> mount -t userfs /etc/myfs.conf /myfs
I did this a while ago: I wrote userfs which allowed arbirary filesystems to be
implemented in user space. One of these was a filesystem which allowed you to
embed scripts in symlinks, such that stdout of the scri
Hi,
Could you make these 5 instances of "Not unsure" be more
palatable and less confusing?
E.g., "Not sure" or "If not sure".
But not the double negative...
As is, it basically says: "Sure ? say M."
~Randy
> -Original Message-
> From: Maksim Krasnyanskiy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
Donald Becker wrote:
> I was on vacation, and thus didn't have the opportunity to comment earlier.
Thanks a bunch for your comments here.
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > > - You are proposing some caching for the MII registers. I suppose that you
> > > would like to have this c
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Tom Sightler wrote:
> 1. Transfer of the first 100-150MB is very fast (9.8MB/sec via 100Mb Ethernet,
> close to wire speed). At this point Linux has yet to write the first byte to
> disk. OK, this might be an exaggerated, but very little disk activity has
> occured on my l
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Alok K. Dhir wrote:
>
> Are these page_launder improvements included in 2.4.6-pre3? Linus
> mentions "VM tuning has also happened" in the announcement - but there
> doesn't seem to be mention of it in his list of changes from -pre2...
Yes, it is.
-
To unsubscribe from
Randy,
>Could you make these 5 instances of "Not unsure" be more palatable and less confusing
>?
Oops, blind cut&past without reading carefully :).
Thanks
Max
Maksim Krasnyanskiy
Senior Kernel Engineer
Qualcomm Incorporated
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(408) 557-1092
-
To unsubscribe from
First I have a question about the compression of bzDisk. While trying to
debug the reason for a modular boot failure versus a successful
non-module boot (XFS filesystem for root), I found that I can mount my
initial ramdisk on loopback as a means of examining which modules are
available to it. How
Mark Mokryn wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to build an SMP module on a machine running a UP kernel
> (or vice versa)? We of course get unresolved symbols during module load
> due to the smp prefix on the ksyms, and haven't seen how to get around
> it. (Defining __SMP__ does not cut it, though
Thanks for the quick reply!
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:54:21 -0700 (PDT)
James Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I currently try to debug why the sisfb driver crashes my machine. (SIS 630
> > based laptop - linux-2.4.5-ac13).
>
> You can do one of two things. Post both System.map and the co
I would suggest that you use the e100 driver instead of the eepro100 driver.
We switched to the e100 driver from the eepro100 driver, and a number of our
FTP, NFS and rsync (IE: High bandwidth apps) problems went away.
Our system are mostly 6 Proc boxes with 4 gigs of memeory.
--
Jason Murphy
> Question 2, apparently ramdisk uses gzip compression; the name of the
> kernel from make bzImage seems to maybe refer to bzip2 compression. Is
> the kernel image using gzip or bzip2 compression for bzImage? Would
bzImage stands for "big zImage" - this is a format invented for kernels that
don't
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Boenisch Joerg wrote:
> I hope not to be off topic! (In that case could you tell me where to ask?)
You can try [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the newsgroup
de.alt.comm.isdn4linux.de, but I can't guarantee success there, either.
> Kernel of course is compiled with ISDN support and lo
Greetings Craig,
I would like to publicly thank you for coming to the table of GNU/GPL with
an open perspective. After 90 minutes on the phone, of which 45 minutes
were me pointing out issues promblems and complaints w/ 20 minutes on ways
to work on solutions in the near and distant future and
Pavel Machek wrote:
> > The problem is that there are comparisons of pointers to task_struct when
> > deciding if the task is alive. If one task dies and other one starts, it is
> > possible (is it?) that the task structure of the newly created task resides
> > at the very address where was the de
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> Sven Geggus wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > on my Elan410 based System it is very easy to change the CPU clock
> > speed by means od two outb commands.
> >
> > I was wondering, if it does some harm to the Kernel if the CPU is
> > reprogrammed using a different CPU cloc
Hi.
First, sorry if this is a glibc issue. Just chose to ask here first.
I want to know the CPU time used by a POSIX-threaded program. I have tried
to use getrusage() with RUSAGE_SELF and RUSAGE_CHILDREN. Problem:
main thread just do nothing, spawns children and waits. And I get always
0 ru_utim
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:08:39AM +0100, Paulo E. Abreu wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have this laptop and I am having trouble with pcmcia in every 2.4.x
> kernel.
> Someone suggested that this could be a BIOS bug ...
> Below there is the information, that I think is relevant to this problem. If
>
Hello,
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Boenisch Joerg wrote:
>
> If you dig it up somewhere and get it working with 2.4.5, it would be nice
> if you let me know. We can then work together to integrate it into the
> kernel tree - I can't do it myself, becau
Okay, I'll bite. What's HCI stand for?
I'm guessing it ends in "Connection Interface", but the H has me stumped.
Happy? Hostile? Hysterical? Hippopotamus?
If we're connecting a bluetooth compliant hippopotamus to Linux, I can only
hope there's an RFC somewhere explaining how to do it. Th
On Tuesday, June 12, 2001 01:17:49 PM -0700 Larry McVoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Folks, I believe I have a reproducible test case which corrupts data in
> 2.4.5.
>
> We do nightly, weekly, and monthly backups by copying our entire /home
> partition on the company file server:
>
> Filesyst
>Okay, I'll bite.
Ouch that hurts ;)
>What's HCI stand for?
>I'm guessing it ends in "Connection Interface", but the H has me stumped.
Wrong guess. HCI - Host Controller Interface.
People who use Bluetooth would know. HCI is the basic thing in Bluetooth world.
I don't think explaining that a
Anyone concerned about the current size of the kernel source code? I am, and
I propose to start cleaning house on the x86 platform. I mean it's all very
well and good to keep adding features, but stuff needs to go if kernel
development is to move forward. Before listing the gunk I want to get rid
Hi,
Andre and I did indeed have a nice conversation on the phone. Thank you
again for taking the time to talk with me and offering your assistance. As I
stated on the phone, we are making a large commitment of resources to
supporting Linux by releasing drivers and utilities for our products,
incl
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Daniel wrote:
> So without further ado here're the features I want to get rid of:
>
> i386, i486
> math-emu
> ISA bus, MCA bus, EISA bus
> ISA, MCA, EISA device drivers
> parallel/serial/game ports
++
| Please, |
|don't feed |
|
Cleanup is a nice idea , but Linux should support old hardware and should
not affect them in any way.
Jaswinder.
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Linux kernel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 5:44 PM
Subject: obsolete code must die
> Anyon
Daniel wrote:
>
> Anyone concerned about the current size of the kernel source code? I am, and
> I propose to start cleaning house on the x86 platform. I mean it's all very
> well and good to keep adding features, but stuff needs to go if kernel
> development is to move forward. Before listing th
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
