> Fragmentation does _not_ work on poor internet more. At all.
We are implementing an IP stack. Fragmentation works very well thank you,
pointing at a few broken sites as an excuse to not do things right isnt
very good.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ker
On Mon, Feb 19 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > So put 0 and sure anyone can submit I/O on the size that they want.
> > Now the driver has to support padding reads, or gathering data to do
> > a complete block write. This is silly. Sr should support 512b transfers
> > just fine, but only because I added
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 12:57:14AM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > The XOR patent and the fraudulent enforcement of it is the purest
> > embodiment of everything that is wrong with the patent system and IP law.
> As a person with a some decades of experi
> I've been poring over the x86 boot code for a while now and I've been
> considering writing a FAQ on the boot process (mostly for my own use,
> but maybe others will be interested). This would include all relevant
> information on setting up the x86 hardware for a boot (timers, PIC, A20,
> prote
> The programs 'gpm', 'kudzu' and 'startx' all hang the server immediately
> after they exit (with exit status 0). I cannot pinpoint why the kernel hangs
> and would appreciate any help. The only thing I suspect it may be is that it
The three of them all touch the mouse. Does
dd if=/dev/psau
> it had been cleared up. In particular, the Configure.help in 2.4.2-pre4
> says "reiserfs can be used for anything that ext2 can be used for".
The configure.help is wrong on that and one other thing. NFS doesnt work
without extra patches and big endian boxes dont work with reiserfs currently
C
> > But it has to go somewhere, and 2.4 right now is unusable on two of my boxes
> > with M/O drives.
>
> Reads can be pretty easily padded, but writes are a bit harder. Maybe
> push it to some helper before the device queue sees it? For 2.4 the
> best sd solution is probably to just make it able
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 12:57:14AM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > > The XOR patent and the fraudulent enforcement of it is the purest
> > > embodiment of everything that is wrong with the patent system and IP law.
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > As a person with a some decade
On Sunday February 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 12:57:14AM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > > > The XOR patent and the fraudulent enforcement of it is the purest
> > > > embodiment of everything that is wrong with the patent system and IP law.
>
> > On Sun, 18 Feb 2001 [
is it stable for use?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Dear Kernel mailing list ,
what changes i have to made in kernel so that i can
run kernel from ROM, means i keep my kernel in ROM
and i execute my kernel from ROM .
Thanks ,
Happy Hacking,
Jaswinder.
--
These are my opinions not 3Di.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr
Not to be pushy or anything but since I received zero responses to this I
was wondering what else I can do. I'd be happy to patch the problem myself
but I have no idea what the correct value for DK_MAX_MAJOR should be.
Anywho, if anyone has any thoughts I'd appreciate them.
--Rainer
> -Or
Neil Brown writes:
>On Sunday February 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I migrated some exported disks over to reiserfs and had no luck when I
>> mounted the disk via NFS on another machine. I've noticed many messages
>> about reiser and NFS in the archives, but my understanding was
On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 05:47:10PM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 12:57:14AM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > > The XOR patent and the fraudulent enforcement of it is the purest
> > > embodiment of everything that is wrong with the p
On Sunday February 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> OK, I grabbed these patches and applied them against 2.4.2-pre4 and
> recompiled, rebooted. I am now able to use reiserfs with NFS,
> basic operations appear to work as expected but I haven't done large amounts
> of file IO or lots of concurren
I'm getting multiple messages like:
Feb 18 23:05:50 rhino kernel: ip_conntrack: maximum limit of 8184 entries exceeded
Feb 18 23:05:52 rhino last message repeated 2 times
while running nessus, with 100 simultaneous connections set, against a
company machine. This is the first time I've observed
Dear Sirs,
Thanks for your help,
I see . The biggest negative point of running kernel from ROM is that ROM
speed is slow :(
Any how , thanks for your help,
Best Regards,
Jaswinder.
--
These are my opinions not 3Di.
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Waltenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
Jamie wrote:
>
> Hi !
>
> I've been trying to determine the reliability of kernel timers when a box has been
>up for a while. Now as everyone is aware (for HZ=100 (default)), when the uptime of
>the kernel reaches (approx.) 1.3 years the clock tick count (jiffies) wraps-around.
>Now if a kern
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 05:47:10PM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > Actually the problem is lack of morals and bad people who are really evil
> > at the core (you wouldnt want them for your neighbor).
> Actually, it's because we've made it illegal to corpo
This message pops up in my logs countless times, often accompanied by
temporarily freezes of the system, and pops in the sound. It seems to
occur more often when under load, i.e. playing a DVD. In fact, they
degrade the performance so badly as to make DVDs unwatchable.
I would chock this up to
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Marc Esipovich wrote:
>
> I've noticed this when attempting to build APMD, mc146818rtc.h has
> a reference to a spinlock_t while asm/spinlock.h is not included.
>
> Patch follows:
User space does not need to ever see any kernel spinlocks - you will find
such a fix for this is in
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
