Re: xen-netback fixes for stable 35876b5 3e55f8b

2013-02-22 Thread David Miller
They are already queued up, see: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?state=* -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read

Re: xen-netback fixes for stable 35876b5 3e55f8b

2013-02-22 Thread William Dauchy
On Feb22 17:44, Ian Campbell wrote: > He likes to soak thing in mainline for a bit before forwarding to stable > which is likely why they aren't there yet > http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=136029801624783&w=2 ack, didn't know that. -- William signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: xen-netback fixes for stable 35876b5 3e55f8b

2013-02-22 Thread Ian Campbell
Adding Dave Miller, the networking maintainer. He needs to ack such requests I think. Adding netdev too for good meassure. On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 16:47 +, William Dauchy wrote: > Hello, > > I believe the two commits 35876b5 and 3e55f8b could be included in stable > tree. > 35876b5 is related

Re: xen-netback fixes for stable 35876b5 3e55f8b

2013-02-22 Thread William Dauchy
On Feb22 09:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > What does that mean? Should they be applied for those kernels or not? Yes indeed. Sorry for my confused answer. Thanks, -- William signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: xen-netback fixes for stable 35876b5 3e55f8b

2013-02-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:17:54PM +0100, William Dauchy wrote: > On Feb22 09:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > You mean 3.4 and newer, right? > > Are you sure that 3.2 and 3.0 aren't also relevant here? > > They are, but didn't test them directly. > I just applied them without trouble. What does

Re: xen-netback fixes for stable 35876b5 3e55f8b

2013-02-22 Thread William Dauchy
On Feb22 09:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > You mean 3.4 and newer, right? > Are you sure that 3.2 and 3.0 aren't also relevant here? They are, but didn't test them directly. I just applied them without trouble. Thanks, -- William signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: xen-netback fixes for stable 35876b5 3e55f8b

2013-02-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 05:47:28PM +0100, William Dauchy wrote: > Hello, > > I believe the two commits 35876b5 and 3e55f8b could be included in stable > tree. > 35876b5 is related to 4885628 already in the stable tree and fixes a > possible oops. > 3e55f8b is fixing another possible oops (see com

xen-netback fixes for stable 35876b5 3e55f8b

2013-02-22 Thread William Dauchy
Hello, I believe the two commits 35876b5 and 3e55f8b could be included in stable tree. 35876b5 is related to 4885628 already in the stable tree and fixes a possible oops. 3e55f8b is fixing another possible oops (see commit messages). I tested them on top of a v3.4.33. Could we consider adding the