On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 04:48:14PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Thomas, amazing job distilling some sanity out of the pandemonium.
>
> For future patch submissions, I would ask everyone to at least add
> x...@kernel.org to To: or Cc: (along with lkml). It's not only good
> etiquette to help the
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 11:55:17AM +, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> FWIW we've done a backport of the sysfs/vulnerability and retpoline
> parts to 4.9, including cherry-picking a few earlier needed commits:
> http://git.infradead.org/retpoline-stable.git/shortlog/refs/heads/linux-4.9.y
>
> Josh, I
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:44:48PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Folks!
>
> After 10 days of frenzy following the disclosure of the mess, I'm at a
> point where I think that the current set which we have in Linus tree and
> the pending patches in tip:x86/pti plus one not yet applied patch (RSB o
Folks!
After 10 days of frenzy following the disclosure of the mess, I'm at a
point where I think that the current set which we have in Linus tree and
the pending patches in tip:x86/pti plus one not yet applied patch (RSB on
context switch) have reached a state where the main targets are covered
e
4 matches
Mail list logo
