On 2020/11/19 9:58, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 5:05 PM Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2020/11/18 14:26, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2020/11/18 12:06, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 3:33 PM Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>
> In realtime scenario, We do n
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 5:05 PM Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/11/18 14:26, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2020/11/18 12:06, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 3:33 PM Yunfeng Ye wrote:
> >>>
> >>> In realtime scenario, We do not want to have interference on the
> >>> isolated
On 2020/11/18 14:26, Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/11/18 12:06, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 3:33 PM Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>>>
>>> In realtime scenario, We do not want to have interference on the
>>> isolated cpu cores. but when invoking alloc_workqueue() for percpu wq
>>> on
On 2020/11/18 12:06, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 3:33 PM Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>>
>> In realtime scenario, We do not want to have interference on the
>> isolated cpu cores. but when invoking alloc_workqueue() for percpu wq
>> on the housekeeping cpu, it kick a kworker on the isol
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 3:33 PM Yunfeng Ye wrote:
>
> In realtime scenario, We do not want to have interference on the
> isolated cpu cores. but when invoking alloc_workqueue() for percpu wq
> on the housekeeping cpu, it kick a kworker on the isolated cpu.
>
> alloc_workqueue
> pwq_adjust_ma
In realtime scenario, We do not want to have interference on the
isolated cpu cores. but when invoking alloc_workqueue() for percpu wq
on the housekeeping cpu, it kick a kworker on the isolated cpu.
alloc_workqueue
pwq_adjust_max_active
wake_up_worker
The comment in pwq_adjust_max_act
6 matches
Mail list logo