Re: what's up for v2.6.25 in x86.git

2008-01-22 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 22 January 2008 12:13, Nick Piggin wrote: > > On Tuesday 22 January 2008 07:14, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Nick Piggin (5): > > > mm: fix PageUptodate memory ordering bug > > > > This should actually be named differently. It should be > >

Re: what's up for v2.6.25 in x86.git

2008-01-21 Thread Nick Piggin
On Tuesday 22 January 2008 12:13, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Tuesday 22 January 2008 07:14, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Nick Piggin (5): > > mm: fix PageUptodate memory ordering bug > > This should actually be named differently. It should be > called > > x86: don't unconditionally enable expensive SM

Re: what's up for v2.6.25 in x86.git

2008-01-21 Thread Nick Piggin
On Tuesday 22 January 2008 07:14, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Nick Piggin (5): > mm: fix PageUptodate memory ordering bug This should actually be named differently. It should be called x86: don't unconditionally enable expensive SMP ppro workaround I actually had a more complete patch which prin

what's up for v2.6.25 in x86.git

2008-01-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
What's up for v2.6.25 for the x86 architecture code. There are 763 commits in x86.git so far, from more than 90 contributors, so it would be difficult to mention and credit every contribution in this mail. See the shortlog attached further below for more details. Here's an (incomplete) list of