Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!

2001-01-27 Thread Ion Badulescu
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 18:41:37 +0100, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > >> > Copying between vfat <-> vfat partitions is so slow. It seems >> > that it's vfat/msdos kernel driver problem because I tried to copy >> >> I reported this years ago, with a 700 kB file on a floppy and >> a

Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!

2001-01-27 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Copying between vfat <-> vfat partitions is so slow. It seems > > that it's vfat/msdos kernel driver problem because I tried to copy > > I reported this years ago, with a 700 kB file on a floppy and > a 4 MB file on a Zip disk. In both cases mcopy was several times > faster than the kern

Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!

2001-01-25 Thread Gábor Lénárt
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:56:35AM -0700, Thunder from the hill wrote: > Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > > On/Dnia Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:23:03PM -0600, Brad Felmey wrote/napisa?(a) > > > > I/O support = 0 (default 16-bit) > > > > > > hdparm -c1 /dev/hda, or are you running in 16-bit mode on

Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!

2001-01-25 Thread Thunder from the hill
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > On/Dnia Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:23:03PM -0600, Brad Felmey wrote/napisa³(a) > > > I/O support = 0 (default 16-bit) > > > > hdparm -c1 /dev/hda, or are you running in 16-bit mode on purpose? > no purpose. Setting this can only speed up all operations a bit but it

Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!

2001-01-24 Thread Eric Lammerts
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Brad Felmey wrote: > > I/O support = 0 (default 16-bit) > > hdparm -c1 /dev/hda, or are you running in 16-bit mode on purpose? The -c option is only relevant for PIO modes. In this case DMA was on, so it doesn't make any difference. Eric -- Eric Lammerts <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!

2001-01-24 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
> Copying between vfat <-> vfat partitions is so slow. It seems > that it's vfat/msdos kernel driver problem because I tried to copy I reported this years ago, with a 700 kB file on a floppy and a 4 MB file on a Zip disk. In both cases mcopy was several times faster than the kernel code. - To uns

Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!

2001-01-24 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On/Dnia Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:23:03PM -0600, Brad Felmey wrote/napisał(a) > > I/O support = 0 (default 16-bit) > > hdparm -c1 /dev/hda, or are you running in 16-bit mode on purpose? no purpose. Setting this can only speed up all operations a bit but it doesn't change nothing in vfat <-> vfat

Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!

2001-01-24 Thread Brad Felmey
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:14:31 +0100, you, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote: > I/O support = 0 (default 16-bit) hdparm -c1 /dev/hda, or are you running in 16-bit mode on purpose? -- Brad Felmey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body o

vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow!

2001-01-24 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
Copying between vfat <-> vfat partitions is so slow. It seems that it's vfat/msdos kernel driver problem because I tried to copy this file between few partitions (all these on the same disc): hda: IBM-DTLA-307030, ATA DISK drive hda: 60036480 sectors (30739 MB) w/1916KiB Cache, CHS=3737/255/63, U