Re: ufs on linux question/problem

2001-07-03 Thread Admin Mailing Lists
> > You need support of Solaris disklabels. isn't that what CONFIG_SOLARIS_X86_PARTITION is? > And UFS patches that are in > -ac. Then you can get more or less safe r/o mounts. r/w is hopeless > at that stage. that's ok, i only need to read. -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.

Re: ufs on linux question/problem

2001-07-03 Thread Alexander Viro
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Admin Mailing Lists wrote: > > Trying to mount a solaris x86 drive under linux. > kernel 2.4.5, ufs support and x86 partition support compiled in (no > module) > On boot, linux recognizes the drive, but shows no solaris partitions on > it. > Below, linux drive is hda, solar

ufs on linux question/problem

2001-07-03 Thread Admin Mailing Lists
Trying to mount a solaris x86 drive under linux. kernel 2.4.5, ufs support and x86 partition support compiled in (no module) On boot, linux recognizes the drive, but shows no solaris partitions on it. Below, linux drive is hda, solaris is hdb. Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: PIIX4: chipset r