Re: two questions about the boot_delay

2007-08-15 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 03:45:08PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > >On 8/12/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 07:39:33 + Dave Young wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I have tried the "slow down printk" , and I have two questions. > > > > > > 1. why it depends the DEB

Re: two questions about the boot_delay

2007-08-15 Thread Dave Young
>On 8/12/07, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 07:39:33 + Dave Young wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have tried the "slow down printk" , and I have two questions. > > > > 1. why it depends the DEBUG_KERNEL? Sometimes we only need boot_delay > > to see the printk infomations.

Re: two questions about the boot_delay

2007-08-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 07:39:33 + Dave Young wrote: > Hi, > I have tried the "slow down printk" , and I have two questions. > > 1. why it depends the DEBUG_KERNEL? Sometimes we only need boot_delay > to see the printk infomations. How about set it as a standalone > config option? Is depending o

two questions about the boot_delay

2007-08-08 Thread Dave Young
Hi, I have tried the "slow down printk" , and I have two questions. 1. why it depends the DEBUG_KERNEL? Sometimes we only need boot_delay to see the printk infomations. How about set it as a standalone config option? 2. In My system if I boot with boot_delay=200 the early part of booting will be