Re: tunnels: Don't apply GRO to multiple layers of encapsulation.

2017-09-05 Thread joe . korty
Hi Sasha, The backport of fac8e0f579695a3ecbc4d3cac369139d7f819971 tunnels: Don't apply GRO to multiple layers of encapsulation into 4.1 missed a hunk. The same backport into 3.18 was done correctly. This patch introduces the missing hunk into 4.1. Excepts from some emails: Joe

Re: tunnels: Don't apply GRO to multiple layers of encapsulation.

2017-09-01 Thread Jesse Gross
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 6:58 AM, wrote: > [ resend due to mail problems at my end ] > > Hi Jesse, > > The backport of fac8e0f579695a3ecbc4d3cac369139d7f819971, > "tunnels: Don't apply GRO to multiple layers of encapsulation", > to linux-4.1.y seems to have

Re: tunnels: Don't apply GRO to multiple layers of encapsulation.

2017-08-31 Thread joe . korty
[ resend due to mail problems at my end ] Hi Jesse, The backport of fac8e0f579695a3ecbc4d3cac369139d7f819971, "tunnels: Don't apply GRO to multiple layers of encapsulation", to linux-4.1.y seems to have missed a line. The 4.1 commit is 066b300e5be43cb61697539e2a3a9aac5afb422f.

[PATCH 3.16 129/217] tunnels: Don't apply GRO to multiple layers of encapsulation.

2016-04-26 Thread Ben Hutchings
3.16.35-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Jesse Gross commit fac8e0f579695a3ecbc4d3cac369139d7f819971 upstream. When drivers express support for TSO of encapsulated packets, they only mean that they can do it for one layer of encapsul