On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:07:56PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:56:32 +0400
> Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:38:14PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:04:46PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > > > [unrel
Apologies -- I didn't notice lkml on the cc list. I'll catch up from
lkml directly.
-- Ethan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please rea
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:56:32PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
The only suspicious new patch in -rc5-mm1 to me is
fix-sysfs-reclaim-crash.patch which removes "sd->s_dentry = NULL;". Note
that whole sysfs_drop_dentry() is NOP if ->s_dentry is NULL.
Could you try to
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:56:32PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> The only suspicious new patch in -rc5-mm1 to me is
> fix-sysfs-reclaim-crash.patch which removes "sd->s_dentry = NULL;". Note
> that whole sysfs_drop_dentry() is NOP if ->s_dentry is NULL.
>
> Could you try to revert it?
>
>
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:56:32 +0400
Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:38:14PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:04:46PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > > [unrelated maintainers removed, Alexey added]
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:38:14PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:04:46PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > [unrelated maintainers removed, Alexey added]
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:45:24PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > just wanted to add that when
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:04:46PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> [unrelated maintainers removed, Alexey added]
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:45:24PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > just wanted to add that when analyzing the backtrace I found the comment
> > at drivers/char/vt.c/con_close
Hi,
[unrelated maintainers removed, Alexey added]
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:45:24PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just wanted to add that when analyzing the backtrace I found the comment
> at drivers/char/vt.c/con_close() to be VERY suspicious...
> (need to take tty_mutex to prevent conc
8 matches
Mail list logo