Re: timekeeping_adjust may set mult to 0

2013-02-26 Thread David Engraf
Am 15.02.2013 23:34, schrieb John Stultz: On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:48 AM, David Engraf wrote: I have encountered a problem when a linux system uses a clocksource with mult = 1 and shift = 0 (clocksource cycle = nanoseconds). It may happen that the function timekeeping_adjust reduces the value

Re: timekeeping_adjust may set mult to 0

2013-02-15 Thread John Stultz
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:48 AM, David Engraf wrote: > I have encountered a problem when a linux system uses a clocksource with > mult = 1 and shift = 0 (clocksource cycle = nanoseconds). It may happen that > the function timekeeping_adjust reduces the value of mult to 0 when error is > lower than

timekeeping_adjust may set mult to 0

2013-02-11 Thread David Engraf
Hi, I have encountered a problem when a linux system uses a clocksource with mult = 1 and shift = 0 (clocksource cycle = nanoseconds). It may happen that the function timekeeping_adjust reduces the value of mult to 0 when error is lower than the interval [1]. As soon as timekeeper.mult is 0, k