>The UPX team owns all copyright in all of UPX and in each part of
> UPX. Therefore, the UPX team may choose which license(s), and has
> chosen two
...
> This permits using UPX to pack a non-GPL executable.
Stupid question time: isn't this what the LGPL was designed to do? The
Library GPL, so p
> > Both source (GPLv2) and pre-compiled binary for x86 are available.
>^
> That's not true. Read
> http://wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at/mfx/upx-license.html
The UPX team owns all copyright in all of UPX and in each part of UPX.
Therefore, the UPX team may choose which license(
- Original Message -
From: "Frank v Waveren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Adrian Bunk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "John Reiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: tighter compr
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 12:15:13AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Both source (GPLv2) and pre-compiled binary for x86 are available.
>^
> That's not true. Read
> http://wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at/mfx/upx-license.html
>From that page:
UPX and the UCL library are free softw
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, John Reiser wrote:
> Beta release v1.11 of the UPX executable compressor http://upx.tsx.org
> offers new, tighter re-compression of compressed Linux kernels for x86.
> Additional space savings of about 15% have been seen using
> "upx --best vmlinuz" (example: 617431 ==> 52509
Beta release v1.11 of the UPX executable compressor http://upx.tsx.org
offers new, tighter re-compression of compressed Linux kernels for x86.
Additional space savings of about 15% have been seen using
"upx --best vmlinuz" (example: 617431 ==> 525099, saving 92332 bytes).
Both source (GPLv2) and p
6 matches
Mail list logo
