> Can you please share the Linux Distribution information along with sparc
> machine specification.
Sun Fire V210 (dual UltraSPARC IIIi), onboard NICs with tg3
driver. Debian unstable snapshot (as last seen in Debian):
deb http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20150725T121538Z/ unstable mai
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>> > Now I reproduced the bug even with 4.7-rc1 so it is older than 4.7. Will
>> > test further.
>>
>> It gets stranger and stranger - my old 4.7 image worked fine, freshly
>> compiled 4.7 exhibits the same problem.
>>
>> Toolchain has not change
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Siva Reddy Kallam
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>>> > That did not go well - bisect found the following commit but that does
>>> > not seem to be related at all. So probably the reproducibility is not
>>> > 100% but more random.
>>>
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>> > That did not go well - bisect found the following commit but that does
>> > not seem to be related at all. So probably the reproducibility is not
>> > 100% but more random.
>>
>> Now I reproduced the bug even with 4.7-rc1 so it is older than
> > That did not go well - bisect found the following commit but that does
> > not seem to be related at all. So probably the reproducibility is not
> > 100% but more random.
>
> Now I reproduced the bug even with 4.7-rc1 so it is older than 4.7. Will
> test further.
It gets stranger and stran
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
> >> That did not go well - bisect found the following commit but that does
> >> not seem to be related at all. So probably the reproducibility is not
> >> 100% but more random.
> >
> > Now I reproduced the bug even with 4.7-rc1 so it is older
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>> That did not go well - bisect found the following commit but that does
>> not seem to be related at all. So probably the reproducibility is not
>> 100% but more random.
>
> Now I reproduced the bug even with 4.7-rc1 so it is older than 4.7. Wi
> That did not go well - bisect found the following commit but that does
> not seem to be related at all. So probably the reproducibility is not
> 100% but more random.
Now I reproduced the bug even with 4.7-rc1 so it is older than 4.7. Will
test further.
>
>
> 4c5773f9f5462dcb372857813918bb
> I am testing 4.8 on my sparcs and got this on Sun V210 (sparc64). This
> is reproducible. 4.8.0-rc3-00013 did not have this problem, will bisect
> when I get some time.
That did not go well - bisect found the following commit but that does
not seem to be related at all. So probably the reprod
9 matches
Mail list logo