PROBLEM: test13-pre3, e2fs corruption

2000-12-22 Thread rkreiner
1. test13-pre3, e2fs corruption 2. running my box 4h 30min i wanted edit some files, the filenames were wrong and other files didnt have the correct data. i unmounted the drive with the data and a e2fsck said wrong group names...bad superblock... after reboot without check or

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-21 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > /usr/bin/time says that program runs for 3.40 - 3.56secs, so after dividing Well, the test looks reasonable if the system load is low. Still the performance is surprisingly low -- after changing the transfer width to 16 bits I ran the test on my dua

2.4.0-test13-pre3 drivers/char/Makefile and CONFIG_DRM_MGA=m

2000-12-20 Thread Wayne Whitney
Hello, When I use 'make menuconfig' on 2.4.0-test13-pre3 to select DRM and the Matrox DRM driver as a module, I get a .config with CONFIG_DRM=y and CONFIG_DRM_MGA=m. However, this causes drivers/char/Makefile to skip the drm subdirectory when compiling modules: its only reference to

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-20 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 20 Dec 00 at 19:52, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > it kills machine; only problem is that 0x1300 wr-rd cycles to VGA apperture > > take 3.48ms, and this does not correspond with needed 200us udelay. > > Hmm, how do you calculate the time? Assuming AGP4x runs at 133MHz and a > read or write cyc

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-20 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > I did... So it uses 'xchg %eax,APIC_ICR' instead of 'movl %eax,APIC_ICR', > yes (as verified in generated code...)? No change, still dies, as expected > (do not forget that before it dies, it can do ~0x1300 write-read cycles I've forgotten indeed...

Re: test13-pre3 woes

2000-12-19 Thread J Sloan
The saga continues into test13-pre3-ac3: (last good tdfx.o was from test12) # uname -a Linux jyro.mirai.cx 2.4.0-test13pre3-ac3 #1 Tue Dec 19 21:26:36 PST 2000 i586 unknown # lsmod Module Size Used by iptable_filter 1872 0 (autoclean) (unused) ip_nat_ftp

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-19 Thread ferret
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip of Petr's system info] > Okay. Mine, as far as I can tell, only depends on the L2 cache being set > to '64MB' instead of '512MB' in the field 'L2 Cache Cacheable Size' under > 'Chipset Features Setup' on my BIOS. This is unfortunately the lates

[ PATCH ] against 2.4.0-test13-pre3 - fixes builds for ALPHA

2000-12-19 Thread Matthew Jacob
Hmm. Gotta build setup-*.c somehow. Alpha Config defines ALPHA_FOO (Generic or specific model #) but not vanilla alpha. --- linux.orig/arch/alpha/config.in Tue Dec 19 14:54:14 2000 +++ linux/arch/alpha/config.in Tue Dec 19 14:53:05 2000 @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ # define_bool CONFIG_UID16 n +def

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-19 Thread ferret
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > On 18 Dec 00 at 21:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Pardon me for not fully groking the issues here and possibly coming to a > > wrong conclusion, but this has to do with SMP systems crashing at APIC > > init time, just before penguin display (w

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-19 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 19 Dec 00 at 19:30, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > When I replaced address with 0xC01B8000 (some cachable memory), it worked > > fine. When replaced with 0xC00C8000 (supposedly unused address, but maybe > > it is just set as cacheable in chipset), it works too. > > Hmm, a read from an uncached

success with test13-pre3

2000-12-19 Thread Dan Aloni
I'm glad to report that 2.4.0-test13-pre3 fixes the lockup (and odd Oops messages) problems I had from test12 til test13-pre2. I've been running it on both of my computers for a day and a half and everything is OK. At first, we thought it had something to do with the modules I was us

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-19 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > Uh. It took couple of hours to find it. Just place > > { int i; volatile unsigned short* p = 0xC00B8000; for (i = 0; i < 6553600; >i++) { *p; } }(**) > > instead of udelay(300) and this loop does not f

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-19 Thread Alan Cox
> > In the case where it boots does it also report mismatched MTRRs ?? > > Yes, it complains. But BIOS correctly reports x1/x2 depending on > number of CPUs I plug into motherboard, so I believe that it did > some initialization before it start loading OS. That may explain the hangs. Intel docs

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-19 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 18 Dec 00 at 21:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Pardon me for not fully groking the issues here and possibly coming to a > wrong conclusion, but this has to do with SMP systems crashing at APIC > init time, just before penguin display (with fbcon at least)? If so, I > have a board that does t

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-19 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 18 Dec 00 at 23:51, Alan Cox wrote: > > Yeah. Just do not read video memory when another CPU starts. I'll try > > disabling cache on both CPUs, maybe it will make some difference, as > > secondary CPU should start with caches disabled. But maybe that it is > > just broken AGP bus, and nothing

[patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs (3rd attempt) (fwd)

2000-12-19 Thread Tigran Aivazian
gt; To: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs (3rd attempt) Hi Linus, The "final" version of yesterday contained two bugs (thanks to Andreas Dilger for spotting both of them). This version contains 0 bugs and was very thorou

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-18 Thread ferret
Pardon me for not fully groking the issues here and possibly coming to a wrong conclusion, but this has to do with SMP systems crashing at APIC init time, just before penguin display (with fbcon at least)? If so, I have a board that does this with certain cache settings made in the BIOS. It's a 4

Re: test13-pre3

2000-12-18 Thread Dieter Nützel
> List: linux-kernel > Subject: Re: test13-pre3 woes > From: Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2000-12-18 9:19:13 > [Download message RAW] > > > [J Sloan] > > The module now compiles and gets installed - > > Unfortunate

Re: test13-pre3 woes

2000-12-18 Thread J Sloan
d version 2.3.21 ... > The most important question: Did you run "make dep" after doing the patch? Yes, after the patch, it was, as always: make clean make menuconfig make dep bzlilo modules modules_install Same problem with 2.4.0-test13-pre3-ac1 on my Linux workstation at the office, wh

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-18 Thread Alan Cox
> Yeah. Just do not read video memory when another CPU starts. I'll try > disabling cache on both CPUs, maybe it will make some difference, as > secondary CPU should start with caches disabled. But maybe that it is > just broken AGP bus, and nothing else. But until I find what's really > broken o

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-18 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 18 Dec 00 at 19:44, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > No, I'll try. It occured with either AGP (Matrox G200/G400/G450) or > > PCI (S3, CL5434) VGA adapter. I did not tried real ISA VGA... > > Oops, I've forgotten there exist non-ISA display adapters. ;-) Just try > if accessing one bus or another

2.4.0-test13-pre3 m68k Makefiles

2000-12-18 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
This patch updates the Makefiles used by Linux/m68k to the new Makefile syntax. Additionally I fixed a bug in arch/ppc/amiga/Makefile (for APUS). --- linux-2.4.0-test13-pre3/MakefileMon Dec 18 12:34:22 2000 +++ linux-m68k-test13-pre3/Makefile Mon Dec 18 12:40:50 2000 @@ -159,7 +159,7

Re: test13-pre3

2000-12-18 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Linus, On 18 Dec 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote: > The appended patch fixes the following: > > 1) We cannot unlock the page in shmem_writepage on ooswap since >page_launder will do this later. > > 2) We should set the inode number of SYSV segments to the (user) >shmid and not the inte

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-18 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > It is possible. But it is hard to track, as it works with serial console, > and it is not possible to paint characters to VGA screen, as vgacon uses > hardware panning instead of scrolling :-( And if it dies, shift-pageup > apparently does not work...

[final] Re: [patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs (2nd attempt)

2000-12-18 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Andreas Dilger wrote: > If I could add one thing here (we have had a 2.2 patch like this for testing > with ext3) - if you specify the rootfstype parameter don't use the "quiet" > option to read_super, so you know why it couldn't mount a specific filesystem > as root, and/or p

Re: [patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs (2nd attempt)

2000-12-18 Thread Andreas Dilger
Tigran, you write: > Thanks to suggestions from Andries and Peter I enhanced the rootfs patch > to do the same it did before + panic when rootfs= is given but failed to If I could add one thing here (we have had a 2.2 patch like this for testing with ext3) - if you specify the rootfstype paramete

Re: Startup IPI (was: Re: test13-pre3)

2000-12-18 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 18 Dec 00 at 18:18, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > > No. Without udelay() before first printk() it just does not boot on my > > motherboard. There were two choices: either remove all printk() from > > these loops (define Dprintk to null), or add udela

Re: test13-pre3

2000-12-18 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > No. Without udelay() before first printk() it just does not boot on my > motherboard. There were two choices: either remove all printk() from > these loops (define Dprintk to null), or add udelay(x), where x >= 200, > before first printk. I sent patch

Re: test13-pre3

2000-12-18 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 18 Dec 00 at 13:58, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > What is this change about? > > diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.4.0-test12/linux/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c >linux/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c > --- v2.4.0-test12/linux/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c Mon Dec 11 17:59:43 2000 > +++ linux/arch/i

Oops Re: [patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs (2nd attempt)

2000-12-18 Thread Tigran Aivazian
just a typo in the comment, sorry. Corrected version below. diff -urN -X dontdiff linux/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt rootfs/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt --- linux/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt Tue Sep 5 21:51:14 2000 +++ rootfs/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt Mon Dec

[patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs (2nd attempt)

2000-12-18 Thread Tigran Aivazian
). Now, everyone is (hopefully) happy. Tested under 2.4.0-test13-pre3. Regards, Tigran diff -urN -X dontdiff linux/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt rootfs/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt --- linux/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt Tue Sep 5 21:51:14 2000 +++ rootfs/Documentation/kernel

Re: [patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs boot param. support

2000-12-18 Thread Tigran Aivazian
Ok, the version below doesn't look too bad, except a couple things, see below: On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Peter Samuelson wrote: > -__setup("rootfs=", rootfs_setup); > +__setup("rootfstype=", rootfs_setup); this is wrong. If the parameter is "rootfstype" then the function is rootfstype_setup(). Too lo

Re: [patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs boot param. support

2000-12-18 Thread Tigran Aivazian
of re-sending) (the original got lost because of the mail-abuse vs btconnect's randomness) >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 18 15:20:08 2000 Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 14:44:32 + (GMT) From: Tigran Aivazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] S

Re: [patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs boot param. support

2000-12-18 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Andries Brouwer] > (i) I prefer "rootfstype". Indeed, "rootfs" is ambiguous. > It gives some property of the root filesystem, but which? > (ii) It is a bad idea to arbitrarily select "ext2". > (iii) [...] Thus, if the boot option rootfstype is given, I prefer a > boot failure over a kernel att

Re: [patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs boot param. support

2000-12-18 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Tigran Aivazian] > no, because it would cause a "spurious" call to get_fs_type("") which > we don't want to happen (by default i.e. -- if user _really_ wants it > that is ok). The default of "ext2" is fine. I still disagree -- super.c is no place to dictate the default root filesystem. And I a

Re: [PATCH] 2.4.0-test13-pre3: Makefile problem in drivers/video

2000-12-18 Thread Norbert Breun
Peter, Alan, thanks, this solved the problem - 2.4.0-test13pre3 is up 'n running ;) BTW: Is it possible to shut off these "apic error on CPU0" messages." Now I know that my board is not well designed, so what should these messages help me? They blow up my /var/log/messages only... kind regards N

Re: test13-pre3

2000-12-18 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Linus, On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > The shmfs cleanup should be unnoticeable except to users who use SAP > with huge shared memory segments, where Christoph Rohlands work not > only makes the code much more readable, it should also make it > dependable.. :-) The appended pat

Re: test13-pre3 woes

2000-12-18 Thread Olaf Titz
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > [J Sloan] > > The module now compiles and gets installed - > > Unfortunately, attempting to load it does not go well: > > > > kernel/drivers/char/drm/tdfx.o: unresolved symbol remap_page_range >... > Those symbols are rather generic and rather important.

Re: [patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs boot param. support

2000-12-18 Thread Andries . Brouwer
From: Tigran Aivazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +rootfs=[KNL] Use filesystem type specified (e.g. rootfs=ext2) for root. (i) I prefer "rootfstype". Indeed, "rootfs" is ambiguous. It gives some property of the root filesystem, but which? +static char rootfs[128] __initdat

Re: [patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs boot param. support

2000-12-18 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Tigran Aivazian] > > +/* this can be set at boot time, e.g. rootfs=ext2 > > + * if set to invalid value or if read_super() fails on the specified > > + * filesystem type then mount_root() will go through all registered filesystems. > > + */ > > +

Re: test13-pre3

2000-12-18 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
udelay(200); If we need 600usecs of delay for certain systems, then why not just make it like below? Maciej -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--+ +e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: [patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs boot param. support

2000-12-18 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Tigran Aivazian] > +/* this can be set at boot time, e.g. rootfs=ext2 > + * if set to invalid value or if read_super() fails on the specified > + * filesystem type then mount_root() will go through all registered filesystems. > + */ > +static char rootfs[128] __initdata = "ext2"; Better that w

Re: [patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs boot param. support

2000-12-18 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
"Tigran Aivazian wrote:" > In November last year I wrote support for a new boot parameter called > "rootfs" implementing functionality similar to UnixWare7, i.e. being > able to specify the filesystem type to try first in mount_root() and if > this fails then go on to the usual loop over all regi

Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre3: Makefile problem in drivers/video

2000-12-18 Thread Alan Cox
> you may be right there is no module "video.o". The problem is, there should > be a directory "media" under /lib/modules/2.4.0-test12.old/kernel/drivers/ > and this is missing in test13pre2 and test13pre3. The modules are not built. Its a small makefile error again. The directories are not lis

[patch-2.4.0-test13-pre3] rootfs boot param. support

2000-12-18 Thread Tigran Aivazian
lt, I have kernel panics because it successfully mounts the garbage as a valid ext2 filesystem simply because the real filesystem on the block device happens to use the location of the block containing superblock different than ext2. Therefore, please consider this tiny patch, tested against 2.4.0-t

2.4.0-test13-pre3: unresolved symbols in dsbr100.o, ibmcam.o and ov511.o

2000-12-18 Thread Miles Lane
depmod -ae -F System.map 2.4.0-test13-pre3 depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.0-test13-pre3/kernel/drivers/usb/dsbr100.o depmod: video_register_device depmod: video_unregister_device depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.0-test13-pre3/kernel/drivers

Re: test13-pre3 woes

2000-12-18 Thread Peter Samuelson
[J Sloan] > The module now compiles and gets installed - > Unfortunately, attempting to load it does not go well: > > kernel/drivers/char/drm/tdfx.o: unresolved symbol remap_page_range > kernel/drivers/char/drm/tdfx.o: unresolved symbol __wake_up > kernel/drivers/char/drm/tdfx.o: unresolved symb

Re: test13-pre3 woes

2000-12-18 Thread J Sloan
Niels Kristian Bech Jensen wrote: > Does this patch fix your problem? > > --- test13-pre3/drivers/char/Makefile Mon Dec 18 01:21:31 2000 > +++ linux/drivers/char/Makefile Mon Dec 18 06:58:06 2000 > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ > > O_TARGET := char.o > > +mod-subdirs := drm

[PATCH] 2.4.0-test13-pre3: Makefile problem in drivers/video

2000-12-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Norbert Breun] > The problem is, there should be a directory "media" under > /lib/modules/2.4.0-test12.old/kernel/drivers/ and this is missing in > test13pre2 and test13pre3. The modules are not built. Does this help? I think it's right. Peter diff -urk.orig 2.4.0test13pre3/drivers/media/Mak

Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre3: Makefile problem in drivers/video

2000-12-17 Thread Norbert Breun
Peter, you may be right there is no module "video.o". The problem is, there should be a directory "media" under /lib/modules/2.4.0-test12.old/kernel/drivers/ and this is missing in test13pre2 and test13pre3. The modules are not built. kind regards Norbert On Monday 18 December 2000 07:11, Pe

Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre3: Makefile problem in drivers/video

2000-12-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Mikael Djurfeldt] > When trying to build video.o as a module, video.o doesn't get copied > to /lib/modules/* during installation. There is no video.o module. If video.o is built at all, it is linked into the vmlinux image directly. The modules in that directory will be atyfb.o, tdfxfb.o and a

Re: test13-pre3 woes

2000-12-17 Thread Niels Kristian Bech Jensen
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, J Sloan wrote: > Similar problem here - with CONFIG_DRM_TDFX=m > I have not gotten a tdfx.o module complied since the > start of the test13-pre series... > > So no quake 3 arena unless I want to play at < 1 fps... > Does this patch fix your problem? --

Re: test13-pre3

2000-12-17 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Albert Cranford] > With CONFIG_DRM_R128=m > we fail to produce module linux/drivers/char/drm/r128.o He's right. Linus, please apply. Peter --- test13pre3/drivers/char/Makefile.orig Wed Dec 13 23:56:01 2000 +++ test13pre3/drivers/char/MakefileSun Dec 17 23:55:00 2000 @@ -25,6 +25,7

Re: test13-pre3 woes

2000-12-17 Thread J Sloan
Similar problem here - with CONFIG_DRM_TDFX=m I have not gotten a tdfx.o module complied since the start of the test13-pre series... So no quake 3 arena unless I want to play at < 1 fps... :( jjs Albert Cranford wrote: > With CONFIG_DRM_R128=m > we fail to produce module linux/drivers/char/dr

Re: test13-pre3

2000-12-17 Thread Albert Cranford
With CONFIG_DRM_R128=m we fail to produce module linux/drivers/char/drm/r128.o Any thoughts. Albert Linus Torvalds wrote: > > The most noticeable part of this is that the run_task_queue fix should > cure the lockup that some people have seen. > > The shmfs cleanup should be unnoticeable except

Re: test12 final, test13-pre3 freezing system

2000-12-17 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
known problem with netfilter. I think someone is working on it. Robert Lynch wrote: > > I find that running these kernels (because of a netfilter modules > compile error, didn't try test13-pre1 or 2) in X my entire system > freezes, requiring a hard reboot. With test12 final, suddenly > the scr

test12 final, test13-pre3 freezing system

2000-12-17 Thread Robert Lynch
I find that running these kernels (because of a netfilter modules compile error, didn't try test13-pre1 or 2) in X my entire system freezes, requiring a hard reboot. With test12 final, suddenly the screen streaked, then froze. No oops, just the freeze. Been a while (when I used to run Windoze)

2.4.0-test13-pre3: Makefile problem in drivers/video

2000-12-17 Thread Mikael Djurfeldt
When trying to build video.o as a module, video.o doesn't get copied to /lib/modules/* during installation. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

linux-2.4.0-test13-pre3: Makefile problem in ipv4/netfilter

2000-12-17 Thread Mikael Djurfeldt
When trying to compile linux-2.4.0-test13-pre3 with the following .config: kernel configuration I got the following error message: -- ld -m elf_i386 -T /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext arch/i386/kernel/head.o

Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre3 and ext2 as module

2000-12-17 Thread Martin Josefsson
hackers are funny people: They count the time in patchlevels. On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Martin Josefsson wrote: > On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Martin Josefsson wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > > I compiled test13-pre3 a few minutes ago and when runnin

Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre3 and ext2 as module

2000-12-17 Thread Martin Josefsson
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Martin Josefsson wrote: > On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > I compiled test13-pre3 a few minutes ago and when running > > > make modules_install I got this: > > > > > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in >/lib/mo

Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre3 and ext2 as module

2000-12-17 Thread Martin Josefsson
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > I compiled test13-pre3 a few minutes ago and when running > > make modules_install I got this: > > > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in >/lib/modules/2.4.0-test13-pre3/kernel/fs/ext2/ext2.o > > depmod: buf

Re: 2.4.0-test13-pre3 and ext2 as module

2000-12-17 Thread Alan Cox
> I compiled test13-pre3 a few minutes ago and when running > make modules_install I got this: > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in >/lib/modules/2.4.0-test13-pre3/kernel/fs/ext2/ext2.o > depmod: buffer_insert_inode_queue > depmod: fsync_inode_buffers Jeff

2.4.0-test13-pre3 and ext2 as module

2000-12-17 Thread Martin Josefsson
Hi I compiled test13-pre3 a few minutes ago and when running make modules_install I got this: depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.0-test13-pre3/kernel/fs/ext2/ext2.o depmod: buffer_insert_inode_queue depmod: fsync_inode_buffers As you may have noticed I have ext2

test13-pre3

2000-12-17 Thread Linus Torvalds
The most noticeable part of this is that the run_task_queue fix should cure the lockup that some people have seen. The shmfs cleanup should be unnoticeable except to users who use SAP with huge shared memory segments, where Christoph Rohlands work not only makes the code much more readable, it s