Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
>
> > However, since at least AMD Athlon actually advertises MCA, I would
> > like to verify that the code works on these processors before
> > submitting it to Linus.
>
> The Athlon MCA is basical
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rogier Wolff)
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > crash; I don't expect anyone to actually see an #MF exception in real
> > life. I'm trying to get confirmation from AMD that the code should
> > be correct
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> crash; I don't expect anyone to actually see an #MF exception in real
> life. I'm trying to get confirmation from AMD that the code should
> be correct even for Athlon.
Peter,
Would it be an idea to invite people to lower the voltage on their
CPUs a bit, to try and tri
> However, since at least AMD Athlon actually advertises MCA, I would
> like to verify that the code works on these processors before
> submitting it to Linus.
The Athlon MCA is basically the same architecture-wise as Pentium Pro/II
But there are some differences.. Until AMD make document 21656
Hi friends,
I noticed a slight bug in my CPUID 2.4.0-test11-pre5, and when I
unwound it, found some interesting things.
This relates to the Machine Check Architecture code (bluesmoke.c),
which in the previous code was conditionalized on running on an Intel
CPU. It appears that that shouldn't be
5 matches
Mail list logo
