> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:26:50 +0200 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:44:10PM -0400, Joel Fuster wrote:
> >> Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:56:44PM -0400, Joel Fuster wrote:
> Joel Fuster wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am runni
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:44:10PM -0400, Joel Fuster wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:56:44PM -0400, Joel Fuster wrote:
Joel Fuster wrote:
> Hi,
> I am running 2.6.22.3. For reasons that escape me, over time (days) the
> sysfs_dir_cache, d
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:44:10PM -0400, Joel Fuster wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:56:44PM -0400, Joel Fuster wrote:
>>> Joel Fuster wrote:
Hi,
I am running 2.6.22.3. For reasons that escape me, over time (days) the
sysfs_dir_cache, dentry, and inode_cache
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:56:44PM -0400, Joel Fuster wrote:
Joel Fuster wrote:
Hi,
I am running 2.6.22.3. For reasons that escape me, over time (days) the
sysfs_dir_cache, dentry, and inode_cache SLUB entries grow until they
consume all the memory on my system, requiring a re
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:56:44PM -0400, Joel Fuster wrote:
> Joel Fuster wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am running 2.6.22.3. For reasons that escape me, over time (days) the
>> sysfs_dir_cache, dentry, and inode_cache SLUB entries grow until they
>> consume all the memory on my system, requiring a reboot.
Joel Fuster wrote:
Hi,
I am running 2.6.22.3. For reasons that escape me, over time (days) the
sysfs_dir_cache, dentry, and inode_cache SLUB entries grow until they
consume all the memory on my system, requiring a reboot.
Although I did not record objective evidence of this at the time, I
Hi,
I am running 2.6.22.3. For reasons that escape me, over time (days) the
sysfs_dir_cache, dentry, and inode_cache SLUB entries grow until they
consume all the memory on my system, requiring a reboot.
Although I did not record objective evidence of this at the time, I
suspect I had the sa
7 matches
Mail list logo